Suppr超能文献

电子学习计划后切尔西重症监护物理评估工具(CPAx)的信度、效度和实用性:一项临床测量学研究。

Reliability, validity and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) following an e-learning programme: A clinimetric study.

作者信息

Eggmann Sabrina, Kindler Angela, Hilfiker Roger, Nydahl Peter

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Physiotherapy, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Apr;87:103959. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103959. Epub 2025 Jan 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate inter- and intra-rater reliability, content and concurrent validity, and practicability of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) - a measurement instrument for physical function and activity for patients with a critical illness - from multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals.

METHODS

This was a prospective, longitudinal, clinimetric study. Participants who completed a novel German CPAx e-learning were invited to participate in a voluntary, web-based, piloted, two-round survey. The two rounds were separated by 3-4 weeks to limit recollection of the two patient videos within the e-learning. Following informed consent, we collected participants' characteristics, their CPAx ratings and scoring-duration for the two video cases, content validity indexes along with questions on the practicability of the CPAx. Data was analysed descriptively, quantitatively using Bayesian methods, and qualitatively with an inductive content approach.

RESULTS

In total, 61 clinicians (53 (87 %) physiotherapists, 6 (10 %) nurses, 2 (3 %) occupational therapists) from Switzerland (37 (64 %)), Germany (13 (22 %)), and Austria (8 (14 %)) participated. Inter- (n = 61) and intra-rater (n = 35) reliability for the CPAx were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficients of > 0.8). Content validity index of the CPAx showed a high relevance (> 0.9), though novice users slightly differed from the expert rating (concurrent validity). Healthcare professionals described the CPAx as a practical tool to plan and evaluate physical rehabilitation with a total scoring duration of 5 min, whereby lack of routine, time, and application were seen as barriers in clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the German CPAx as a highly reliable (between and within raters), relevant and practical tool across professions, settings, and countries. These results support an online training, whereby future work should focus on consensus and application into clinical practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

Following an e-learning, the CPAx can be used reliably by multidisciplinary, German-speaking healthcare professionals potentially enhancing physical rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

从多学科、讲德语的医疗保健专业人员的角度,调查切尔西重症监护身体评估工具(CPAx)的评分者间信度、评分者内信度、内容效度、同时效度以及实用性。CPAx是一种用于评估危重病患者身体功能和活动能力的测量工具。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、纵向、临床测量学研究。邀请完成新型德语CPAx电子学习课程的参与者参加一项基于网络的自愿试点两轮调查。两轮调查间隔3至4周,以减少对电子学习课程中两个患者视频的记忆。在获得知情同意后,我们收集了参与者的特征、他们对两个视频病例的CPAx评分和评分时长、内容效度指标以及关于CPAx实用性的问题。数据采用描述性分析、贝叶斯方法进行定量分析,以及归纳性内容分析法进行定性分析。

结果

共有来自瑞士(37人(64%))、德国(13人(22%))和奥地利(8人(14%))的61名临床医生(53名(87%)物理治疗师、6名(10%)护士、2名(3%)职业治疗师)参与。CPAx的评分者间信度(n = 61)和评分者内信度(n = 35)都非常好(组内相关系数> 0.8)。CPAx的内容效度指标显示相关性很高(> 0.9),不过新手用户的评分与专家评分略有不同(同时效度)。医疗保健专业人员将CPAx描述为一种用于规划和评估身体康复的实用工具,总评分时长为5分钟,临床实践中缺乏常规使用、时间和应用被视为障碍。

结论

本研究表明德语CPAx是一种在不同专业、环境和国家中高度可靠(评分者间和评分者内)、相关且实用的工具。这些结果支持在线培训,未来的工作应侧重于达成共识并应用于临床实践。

对临床实践的启示

经过电子学习后,讲德语的多学科医疗保健专业人员可以可靠地使用CPAx,这可能会加强身体康复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验