• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

切尔西重症监护身体评估工具(CPAx):一种创新的新工具,用于测量普通成年重症监护人群身体发病率的验证;一项观察性概念验证初步研究。

The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study.

机构信息

Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London SW10 9NH, UK.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003
PMID:23219649
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a scoring system to measure physical morbidity in critical care - the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx).

METHOD

The development process was iterative involving content validity indices (CVI), a focus group and an observational study of 33 patients to test construct validity against the Medical Research Council score for muscle strength, peak cough flow, Australian Therapy Outcome Measures score, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Bloomsbury sedation score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) score, days of mechanical ventilation and inter-rater reliability.

PARTICIPANTS

Trauma and general critical care patients from two London teaching hospitals.

RESULTS

Users of the CPAx felt that it possessed content validity, giving a final CVI of 1.00 (P<0.05). Construct validation data showed moderate to strong significant correlations between the CPAx score and all secondary measures, apart from the mental component of the SF-36 which demonstrated weak correlation with the CPAx score (r=0.024, P=0.720). Reliability testing showed internal consistency of α=0.798 and inter-rater reliability of κ=0.988 (95% confidence interval 0.791 to 1.000) between five raters.

CONCLUSION

This pilot work supports proof of concept of the CPAx as a measure of physical morbidity in the critical care population, and is a cogent argument for further investigation of the scoring system.

摘要

目的

开发一种评分系统来衡量重症监护中的身体发病率 - 切尔西重症监护身体评估工具(CPAx)。

方法

开发过程是迭代的,涉及内容有效性指数(CVI)、焦点小组和对 33 名患者的观察性研究,以针对肌肉力量的医疗研究委员会评分、峰值咳嗽流量、澳大利亚治疗结果衡量标准、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、布卢姆斯伯里镇静评分、序贯器官衰竭评估评分、短格式 36 项(SF-36)评分、机械通气天数和评分者间可靠性来测试构建有效性。

参与者

来自伦敦两家教学医院的创伤和普通重症监护患者。

结果

CPAx 的使用者认为它具有内容有效性,最终 CVI 为 1.00(P<0.05)。构建有效性数据显示,CPAx 评分与所有次要指标之间存在中度至强显著相关性,除了 SF-36 的心理成分与 CPAx 评分呈弱相关(r=0.024,P=0.720)。可靠性测试显示 5 位评分者之间的内部一致性为α=0.798,评分者间可靠性为κ=0.988(95%置信区间 0.791 至 1.000)。

结论

这项初步工作支持了 CPAx 作为重症监护人群身体发病率衡量标准的概念验证,并且有力地证明了对评分系统进行进一步研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
The Chelsea critical care physical assessment tool (CPAx): validation of an innovative new tool to measure physical morbidity in the general adult critical care population; an observational proof-of-concept pilot study.切尔西重症监护身体评估工具(CPAx):一种创新的新工具,用于测量普通成年重症监护人群身体发病率的验证;一项观察性概念验证初步研究。
Physiotherapy. 2013 Mar;99(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
2
eLearning to facilitate the education and implementation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment: a novel measure of function in critical illness.电子学习促进切尔西重症监护身体评估的教育与实施:一种评估危重病患者功能的新方法。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010614. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010614.
3
Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.《切尔西身体评估工具评估 COVID-19 后康复期患者身体功能的有效性、评分者间信度和可行性:一项横断面研究》。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2023;36(3):527-539. doi: 10.3233/BMR-220191.
4
Chinesisation, adaptation and validation of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional observational study.《切尔西重症监护身体评估工具在危重症患者中的汉化、改编及验证:一项横断面观察性研究》
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e045550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045550.
5
The responsiveness of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool in measuring functional recovery in the burns critical care population: an observational study.切尔西重症监护物理评估工具在烧伤重症监护人群中测量功能恢复的反应性:一项观察性研究。
Burns. 2015 Mar;41(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
6
Predictive validity of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool (CPAx) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults: a prospective clinimetric study.切尔西危重病生理评估工具(CPAx)在危重症、机械通气成人中的预测效度:一项前瞻性临床测量研究。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Jan;45(1):111-116. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2022785. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
7
Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability.《切尔西重症监护身体评估工具挪威语版本(CPAx-NOR):翻译、表面效度、跨文化调适及评分者间信度》
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 31;12(15):5033. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155033.
8
Impact of the Chelsea critical care physical assessment (CPAx) tool on clinical outcomes of surgical and trauma patients in an intensive care unit: An experimental study.切尔西重症监护物理评估(CPAx)工具对重症监护病房手术和创伤患者临床结局的影响:一项实验研究。
S Afr J Physiother. 2018 Aug 23;74(1):450. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v74i1.450. eCollection 2018.
9
German version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-GE): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability.《切尔西重症监护身体评估工具德语版(CPAx-GE):翻译、跨文化调适、效度与信度》
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Aug;44(16):4509-4518. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1909152. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
[Diagnostic tools of intensive care unit acquired weakness: a systematic review].[重症监护病房获得性肌无力的诊断工具:一项系统综述]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Dec;30(12):1154-1160. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.012.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of pressure biofeedback training combined with Liuzijue Qigong training on respiratory function improvement in post-stroke patients with tracheotomy and decannulation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.压力生物反馈训练联合六字诀气功训练对气管切开及拔管后脑卒中患者呼吸功能改善的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 5;15(9):e102517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102517.
2
Effect of early bed cycling on muscle strength and cellular immune factors in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weaknesses - a protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.早期床上运动对重症监护病房获得性肌无力患者肌肉力量和细胞免疫因子的影响——一项随机对照临床试验方案
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2025 Apr 25;14(2):104-110. doi: 10.62347/VBUR5104. eCollection 2025.
3
Brazilian version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment: translation, cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of its clinimetric properties.《切尔西重症监护身体评估》巴西版本:翻译、跨文化调适及其临床测量属性评估
Crit Care Sci. 2025 Apr 25;37:e20250033. doi: 10.62675/2965-2774.20250033. eCollection 2025.
4
Return to work of major trauma survivors from a private level 1 trauma centre in South Africa.南非一家一级私立创伤中心的重大创伤幸存者重返工作岗位情况。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Jan 15;51(1):17. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02712-7.
5
A Comprehensive Physiotherapy Approach to Regain Functional Independence in Intermediate Syndrome Secondary to Organophosphate Poisoning: A Case Report.一种用于恢复有机磷中毒继发中间综合征功能独立性的综合物理治疗方法:病例报告
Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63929. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation of Critically-Ill Patients.危重症患者的早期活动与康复
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2024 Apr;87(2):115-122. doi: 10.4046/trd.2023.0144. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
7
Functional outcomes of patients in ICU using the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment tool: An integrative review.使用切尔西重症监护物理评估工具的重症监护病房患者的功能结局:一项综合综述。
S Afr J Physiother. 2023 Nov 16;79(1):1924. doi: 10.4102/sajp.v79i1.1924. eCollection 2023.
8
Development and implementation of the lung volume reduction pulmonary rehabilitation tool to identify eligibility for lung volume reduction in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease during pulmonary rehabilitation.开发和实施肺容积减少肺康复工具,以确定慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者在肺康复期间进行肺容积减少的资格。
Chron Respir Dis. 2023 Jan-Dec;20:14799731231198863. doi: 10.1177/14799731231198863.
9
Norwegian Version of the Chelsea Critical Care Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx-NOR): Translation, Face Validity, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Inter-Rater Reliability.《切尔西重症监护身体评估工具挪威语版本(CPAx-NOR):翻译、表面效度、跨文化调适及评分者间信度》
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 31;12(15):5033. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155033.
10
Assessment of redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential discrepancies of results of systematic reviews of early mobilisation of critically ill adults: a meta-research protocol.评估危重症成人早期活动系统评价的冗余性、方法学和报告质量,以及结果的潜在差异:一项元研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e074615. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074615.