• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年人群中世界卫生组织-5幸福指数的跨国验证:来自43个国家的研究结果

Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries.

作者信息

Sischka Philipp E, Martin Gina, Residori Caroline, Hammami Nour, Page Nicholas, Schnohr Christina, Cosma Alina

机构信息

University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.

Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Assessment. 2025 Jan 30:10731911241309452. doi: 10.1177/10731911241309452.

DOI:10.1177/10731911241309452
PMID:39884717
Abstract

The five-item World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is among the most frequently used brief standard measures to assess hedonic well-being. Numerous studies have investigated different facets of its psychometric properties in adult populations. However, whether these results apply to adolescents is uncertain, and only few psychometric studies employed adolescent populations. Thus, the current study aimed to conduct an in-depth psychometric item response theory analysis of the WHO-5 among adolescents from 43 countries using the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) 2022 data set and investigated its (a) dimensionality and measurement structure, (b) test information values and marginal reliability, (c) cross-country measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning, and (d) convergent validity with other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries. The WHO-5 showed a unidimensional measurement structure and overall high test information values and marginal reliability. Furthermore, although a large proportion of parameters were flagged as non-invariant, differential test functioning of the WHO-5 was only modest. Moreover, the WHO-5 mainly showed a concurring nomological network with the other measures related to mental health and well-being across countries, although with some differences in effect sizes. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index is a psychometrically sound measure that has shown promise for cross-cultural research among adolescents in the included European, Central Asia, and North American countries. The translated versions of the WHO-5 are available at https://osf.io/pbexq.

摘要

世界卫生组织幸福指数简表(WHO-5)的五项内容是评估享乐幸福感时最常用的简短标准测量工具之一。众多研究调查了其在成年人群体中的心理测量特性的不同方面。然而,这些结果是否适用于青少年尚不确定,而且只有少数心理测量研究采用了青少年群体。因此,本研究旨在利用2022年学龄儿童健康行为(HBSC)数据集,对来自43个国家的青少年中的WHO-5进行深入的心理测量项目反应理论分析,并研究其(a)维度和测量结构,(b)测试信息值和边际信度,(c)跨国测量不变性和项目/测试功能差异,以及(d)与各国心理健康和幸福感相关的其他测量方法的收敛效度。WHO-5显示出单维测量结构以及总体较高的测试信息值和边际信度。此外,尽管很大一部分参数被标记为非不变性,但WHO-5的测试功能差异仅为中等程度。此外,WHO-5主要显示出与各国心理健康和幸福感相关的其他测量方法一致的法理网络,尽管效应大小存在一些差异。WHO-5幸福指数是一种心理测量上合理的测量工具,已显示出在纳入研究的欧洲、中亚和北美国家的青少年跨文化研究中有应用前景。WHO-5的翻译版本可在https://osf.io/pbexq获取。

相似文献

1
Cross-National Validation of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index Within Adolescent Populations: Findings From 43 Countries.青少年人群中世界卫生组织-5幸福指数的跨国验证:来自43个国家的研究结果
Assessment. 2025 Jan 30:10731911241309452. doi: 10.1177/10731911241309452.
2
Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries.10项社会支持量表(SPS - 10)的验证:评估38个国家的因子结构、信度、测量不变性和理论网络
Assessment. 2025 Oct;32(7):1027-1048. doi: 10.1177/10731911241283609. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
3
Item response theory and differential test functioning analysis of the HBSC-Symptom-Checklist across 46 countries.跨 46 个国家的 HBSC-症状清单的项目反应理论和差异测试功能分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Sep 29;22(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01698-3.
4
Measurement Invariance of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index: Evidence from 15 European Countries.世界卫生组织-5 幸福指数的测量不变性:来自 15 个欧洲国家的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;19(16):9798. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169798.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Cross-national validation of the social media disorder scale: findings from adolescents from 44 countries.社交媒体障碍量表的跨国验证:来自 44 个国家青少年的研究结果。
Addiction. 2022 Mar;117(3):784-795. doi: 10.1111/add.15709. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
7
Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation and refinement of the twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale.改善自闭症成年人的述情障碍测量:多伦多述情障碍量表 20 项的心理计量学研究与改进。
Mol Autism. 2021 Mar 2;12(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00427-9.
8
Cross-country comparisons of trends in adolescent psychosomatic symptoms - a Rasch analysis of HBSC data from four Nordic countries.四国青少年心身症状趋势的跨国比较——基于 HBSC 数据的 Rasch 分析
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1097-x.
9
Cross-cultural measurement invariance of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale across 11 world-wide societies.跨 11 个世界社会的修订儿童焦虑和抑郁量表的跨文化测量不变性。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Aug;26(4):430-440. doi: 10.1017/S204579601600038X. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
Improving the measurement of alexithymia in autistic adults: a psychometric investigation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale and generation of a general alexithymia factor score using item response theory.改善自闭症成年人的述情障碍测量:多伦多述情障碍量表 20 项版本的心理计量学研究及使用项目反应理论生成一般述情障碍因子分数。
Mol Autism. 2021 Aug 10;12(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00463-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-country validation of the Arabic version of the WHO-5 Well-Being Index in non-clinical young adults from six Arab countries.世界卫生组织-5福祉指数阿拉伯语版本在六个阿拉伯国家非临床年轻成年人中的跨国验证。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Aug 19;12:e95. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10051. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effects of the Red River Jig on the Wholistic Health of Adults in Saskatchewan.红河夹具对萨斯喀彻温省成年人整体健康的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Aug 6;22(8):1225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22081225.
3
Psychometric evaluation and updated community norms of the WHO-5 well-being index, based on a representative German sample.
基于具有代表性的德国样本对世界卫生组织-5福祉指数进行心理测量评估及更新社区常模。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 29;16:1592614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1592614. eCollection 2025.
4
Impact of multiple educational technologies on well-being: the mediating role of digital cognitive load.多种教育技术对幸福感的影响:数字认知负荷的中介作用。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 5;24(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03655-z.
5
Urban riverbank green spaces as therapeutic environments: Examining the psychosocial benefits of square dance in aging populations in China.城市河岸绿地作为治疗性环境:探究广场舞对中国老年人群的心理社会效益。
SSM Popul Health. 2025 Jul 24;31:101848. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2025.101848. eCollection 2025 Sep.
6
Psychometric validation of an Arabic version of the WHO-5 wellbeing index among Lebanese adolescents.世界卫生组织-5福祉指数阿拉伯语版在黎巴嫩青少年中的心理测量学验证。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 17;20(7):e0317644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317644. eCollection 2025.