Suppr超能文献

“孤独是一种可悲的病症”:来自意大利北部一项混合方法研究中最年长老年人对孤独和社会隔离的实证定义。

"Loneliness is a sad disease": oldest old adults' empirical definition of loneliness and social isolation from a mixed-method study in Northern Italy.

作者信息

Santini Sara, Colombo Mauro, Guaita Antonio, Fabbietti Paolo, Casanova Georgia

机构信息

IRCCS - INRCA National Institute of Health & Science on Aging, Centre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, Ancona, Italy.

Golgi Cenci Foundation, Abbiategrasso, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05678-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Loneliness and social isolation can occur at any stage of life, but some predictors may be more common among older adults. Due to growing population ageing, loneliness and social isolation are relevant social issues. Many studies apply the main definitions of loneliness and social isolation offered by the literature without considering how individual representations, socio-cultural context and the culture of care may influence their perception. This study wishes to fill in these literature gaps by analysing empirical definitions of loneliness and social isolation arising from a mixed-gender randomized sample of Italian oldest old people.

METHODS

Between January and March 2019, 132 older people, most aged 80+, living in a northern Italian town, were asked to answer a questionnaire and a semi-structured interview. According to a mixed-method analysis the definitions of loneliness and social isolation were analysed by respondents' gender, living arrangement (e.g., living alone or with partners or other people), and years of education to find possible associations to the meanings attributed to the two concepts.

RESULTS

The sample was gender-balanced and mid-low educated; more than one fourth of respondents lived alone. The results underline how the empirical definitions of loneliness and social isolation are closer to each other than the academic ones. The two concepts are often perceived by participants as distinct, but they are strongly interconnected so that they can be used interchangeably by older Italian people. The two main themes identified by the analysis are loneliness as "death" and social isolation as "guilt". In the respondents' opinion, the main loneliness driver is the loss of loved, close persons, while social isolation is driven by disability. Age, educational level, and living arrangements did not influence the meanings attributed to social isolation. On the contrary, living arrangement (P = 0.002) and educational level (p = 0.023) seem to influence the empirical definitions of loneliness.

CONCLUSION

The knowledge of the meanings that oldest old give to the two concepts may inspire advanced intervention aimed at buffering the psychological and social consequences of loneliness and social isolation in the older population.

摘要

背景

孤独和社会隔离可能在生命的任何阶段出现,但某些预测因素在老年人中可能更为常见。由于人口老龄化加剧,孤独和社会隔离成为相关的社会问题。许多研究采用了文献中对孤独和社会隔离的主要定义,却未考虑个体认知、社会文化背景以及照护文化如何影响他们对这些概念的理解。本研究希望通过分析来自意大利高龄老人混合性别随机样本中孤独和社会隔离的实证定义来填补这些文献空白。

方法

2019年1月至3月期间,132名居住在意大利北部城镇、大多年龄在80岁以上的老年人被要求回答一份问卷并接受半结构化访谈。根据混合方法分析,通过受访者的性别、居住安排(例如,独居或与伴侣或其他人一起居住)以及受教育年限来分析孤独和社会隔离的定义,以找出与这两个概念所赋予含义的可能关联。

结果

样本性别均衡,受教育程度为中低水平;超过四分之一的受访者独居。结果强调了孤独和社会隔离的实证定义比学术定义彼此更为接近。参与者常常将这两个概念视为不同的,但它们紧密相连,以至于意大利老年人可以互换使用。分析确定的两个主要主题是作为“死亡”的孤独和作为“内疚”的社会隔离。在受访者看来,孤独的主要驱动因素是失去心爱的、亲密的人,而社会隔离的驱动因素是残疾。年龄、教育水平和居住安排并未影响赋予社会隔离的含义。相反,居住安排(P = 0.002)和教育水平(p = 0.023)似乎影响孤独的实证定义。

结论

了解高龄老人赋予这两个概念的含义可能会激发先进的干预措施,以缓解老年人群体中孤独和社会隔离的心理和社会后果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df0d/11783811/af9664d0f35d/12877_2025_5678_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验