• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Trait Social Anxiety Moderates the Relationship Between Emotion-Regulation Strategy Switching and State Anxiety in Daily Life.特质社交焦虑调节日常生活中情绪调节策略转换与状态焦虑之间的关系。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;13(1):160-177. doi: 10.1177/21677026241249192. Epub 2024 May 10.
2
Real-world flexibility in adolescent girls' emotion regulation strategy selection: An investigation of strategy switching.青少年女性情绪调节策略选择中的现实世界灵活性:策略转换的研究。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Feb;36(1):181-195. doi: 10.1017/S0954579422001079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
3
Building an emotion regulation recommender algorithm for socially anxious individuals using contextual bandits.使用上下文强盗算法为社交焦虑个体构建情绪调节推荐算法。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jan;61 Suppl 1:51-72. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12282. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
4
State and Trait Emotion Regulation Diversity in Social Anxiety.社交焦虑中状态和特质情绪调节的差异
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;11(5):894-909. doi: 10.1177/21677026231151956. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
5
Help me Feel Better! Ecological Momentary Assessment of Anxious Youths' Emotion Regulation with Parents and Peers.帮助我感觉好起来!焦虑青少年与父母和同伴进行情绪调节的生态瞬间评估。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;47(2):313-324. doi: 10.1007/s10802-018-0454-2.
6
Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Emotion Experience and Regulation in the Daily Lives of People with High Trait Social Anxiety.特质社交焦虑水平高的人群日常生活中的情绪可塑性信念、情绪体验与调节
Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Dec;44(6):1186-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10139-8. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
The relations between real-time use of emotion regulation strategies and anxiety and depression symptoms.情绪调节策略的实时使用与焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关系。
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Apr;79(4):1082-1098. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23458. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
8
Social anxiety and emotion regulation flexibility: a daily diary approach.社交焦虑与情绪调节灵活性:一项基于日常日记的研究方法。
Cogn Emot. 2024 Mar;38(2):199-216. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2279176. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Examining a developmental pathway from early behavioral inhibition to emotion regulation and social anxiety: The moderating role of parenting.考察从早期行为抑制到情绪调节和社交焦虑的发展途径:教养方式的调节作用。
Dev Psychol. 2021 Aug;57(8):1261-1273. doi: 10.1037/dev0001225.
10
Differential Associations of Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Emotion Regulation with Generalized Anxiety and Social Withdrawal Among Children.儿童内在和人际情绪调节与广泛性焦虑和社交退缩的差异关联
J Genet Psychol. 2025 Jan 29:1-17. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2025.2458493.

引用本文的文献

1
Creative Cognitive Reappraisal Promotes Estimation Strategy Execution in Individuals with Trait Anxiety.创造性认知重评促进特质焦虑个体的估计策略执行。
Brain Sci. 2025 Apr 4;15(4):378. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15040378.

本文引用的文献

1
A theory-informed emotion regulation variability index: Bray-Curtis dissimilarity.一个基于理论的情绪调节变异性指数:布雷-柯蒂斯差异度
Emotion. 2024 Aug;24(5):1273-1285. doi: 10.1037/emo0001344. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
2
State and Trait Emotion Regulation Diversity in Social Anxiety.社交焦虑中状态和特质情绪调节的差异
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;11(5):894-909. doi: 10.1177/21677026231151956. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
3
Products of Variables in Structural Equation Models.结构方程模型中变量的乘积
Struct Equ Modeling. 2023;30(5):708-718. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2141749. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
4
Investigating psychiatric symptoms as predictors of the reasons people do not regulate their emotions in daily life.调查精神症状,以预测人们在日常生活中不调节情绪的原因。
Emotion. 2024 Feb;24(1):241-254. doi: 10.1037/emo0001260. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Assessing Emotion Polyregulation in Daily Life: Who Uses It, When Is It Used, and How Effective Is It?评估日常生活中的情绪多元调节:谁在使用它、何时使用以及效果如何?
Affect Sci. 2022 Dec 8;4(2):248-259. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00166-x. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Real-world flexibility in adolescent girls' emotion regulation strategy selection: An investigation of strategy switching.青少年女性情绪调节策略选择中的现实世界灵活性:策略转换的研究。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 Feb;36(1):181-195. doi: 10.1017/S0954579422001079. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Stability and spread: A novel method for quantifying transitions within multivariate binary time series data.稳定性和传播:一种量化多元二值时间序列数据内部转变的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Sep;55(6):2960-2978. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01942-0. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
8
Always in flux: the role of attentional focus in emotion regulation dynamics.始终处于变化之中:注意焦点在情绪调节动态中的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Mar;36(2):345-351. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.1993146. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
The most important life goals of people with and without social anxiety disorder: Focusing on emotional interference and uncovering meaning in life.患有和未患有社交焦虑障碍的人群最重要的生活目标:关注情绪干扰并探寻生活意义。
J Posit Psychol. 2021;16(2):272-281. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2019.1689423. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
10
Emotion Malleability Beliefs and Emotion Experience and Regulation in the Daily Lives of People with High Trait Social Anxiety.特质社交焦虑水平高的人群日常生活中的情绪可塑性信念、情绪体验与调节
Cognit Ther Res. 2020 Dec;44(6):1186-1198. doi: 10.1007/s10608-020-10139-8. Epub 2020 Jul 31.

特质社交焦虑调节日常生活中情绪调节策略转换与状态焦虑之间的关系。

Trait Social Anxiety Moderates the Relationship Between Emotion-Regulation Strategy Switching and State Anxiety in Daily Life.

作者信息

Daniel Katharine E, Moulder Robert G, Boker Steven M, Teachman Bethany A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.

Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;13(1):160-177. doi: 10.1177/21677026241249192. Epub 2024 May 10.

DOI:10.1177/21677026241249192
PMID:39885898
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11781789/
Abstract

Difficulty knowing when to switch emotion regulation (ER) strategies is theorized to be a key pathway to emotion dysregulation, but relatively few studies have empirically examined this. We applied a new order-based metric to quantify how =109 socially anxious people switched between 19 different ER strategies (or chose not to regulate at all) throughout a 5-week ecological momentary assessment study yielding 12,616 observations. We tested whether state and trait anxiety reports, and their interaction, predicted differences in ER strategy switching. Results indicated that people with relatively higher social anxiety symptoms switch more often between ER strategies during periods of high average state anxiety but less often during periods of high variability in state anxiety than less socially anxious people. Interventions focused on helping socially anxious people learn how ER strategies are connected to variations in state anxiety might hold promise to increase adaptive ER switching decisions. More broadly, expanding ER switching interventions to consider the role of changing situations is an important next step.

摘要

难以知晓何时切换情绪调节(ER)策略被理论化为情绪失调的关键途径,但相对较少的研究对此进行过实证检验。在一项为期5周的生态瞬时评估研究中,我们应用了一种新的基于顺序的指标,以量化109名社交焦虑者在19种不同的ER策略之间如何切换(或根本不进行调节),该研究产生了12616条观察结果。我们测试了状态焦虑和特质焦虑报告及其交互作用是否能预测ER策略切换的差异。结果表明,与社交焦虑程度较低的人相比,社交焦虑症状相对较重的人在平均状态焦虑较高的时期更频繁地在ER策略之间切换,但在状态焦虑变化较大的时期切换频率较低。专注于帮助社交焦虑者了解ER策略如何与状态焦虑变化相关联的干预措施可能有望增加适应性ER切换决策。更广泛地说,扩展ER切换干预措施以考虑变化情境的作用是重要的下一步。