Daniel Katharine E, Moulder Robert G, Boker Steven M, Teachman Bethany A
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, USA.
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jan;13(1):160-177. doi: 10.1177/21677026241249192. Epub 2024 May 10.
Difficulty knowing when to switch emotion regulation (ER) strategies is theorized to be a key pathway to emotion dysregulation, but relatively few studies have empirically examined this. We applied a new order-based metric to quantify how =109 socially anxious people switched between 19 different ER strategies (or chose not to regulate at all) throughout a 5-week ecological momentary assessment study yielding 12,616 observations. We tested whether state and trait anxiety reports, and their interaction, predicted differences in ER strategy switching. Results indicated that people with relatively higher social anxiety symptoms switch more often between ER strategies during periods of high average state anxiety but less often during periods of high variability in state anxiety than less socially anxious people. Interventions focused on helping socially anxious people learn how ER strategies are connected to variations in state anxiety might hold promise to increase adaptive ER switching decisions. More broadly, expanding ER switching interventions to consider the role of changing situations is an important next step.
难以知晓何时切换情绪调节(ER)策略被理论化为情绪失调的关键途径,但相对较少的研究对此进行过实证检验。在一项为期5周的生态瞬时评估研究中,我们应用了一种新的基于顺序的指标,以量化109名社交焦虑者在19种不同的ER策略之间如何切换(或根本不进行调节),该研究产生了12616条观察结果。我们测试了状态焦虑和特质焦虑报告及其交互作用是否能预测ER策略切换的差异。结果表明,与社交焦虑程度较低的人相比,社交焦虑症状相对较重的人在平均状态焦虑较高的时期更频繁地在ER策略之间切换,但在状态焦虑变化较大的时期切换频率较低。专注于帮助社交焦虑者了解ER策略如何与状态焦虑变化相关联的干预措施可能有望增加适应性ER切换决策。更广泛地说,扩展ER切换干预措施以考虑变化情境的作用是重要的下一步。