Yoo Linda, Shapiro Mara, Kahveci Ihsan, Hernandez Isabela, Whittemore Rachael, Kale Tanvi, Winders Samantha, Kamp Kendra
University of Washington School of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Crohns Colitis 360. 2025 Jan 16;7(1):otaf004. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otaf004. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Patient advisory groups are key to guiding research studies through meaningful engagement with the population of interest. Although patient advisory groups are greatly valuable to research studies, they are underutilized in inflammatory bowel disease research. Thus, this study aims to describe the development and implementation of a patient advisory group and evaluate the perspectives of researchers and members.
The Comprehensive Self-Management for inflammatory bowel disease study patient advisory group was created in 2022. The patient advisory group members and researchers completed the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool via an online survey. Thematic analysis of responses was used to identify common themes, and descriptive statistics were reported.
The patient advisory group comprised of patients with inflammatory bowel disease met quarterly. Eight members and three researchers evaluated the patient advisory group. The five emerging themes were (1) lived experience of patient advisory group members; (2) diversity and representation; (3) purposeful engagement; (4) positives of patient advisory group; and (5) improvements to patient advisory group. All members agreed or strongly agreed that the meetings were a good use of their time, and all researchers strongly agreed that the group added value to the research study.
Patient advisory groups can create unique and positive experiences for both members and researchers when feedback is meaningfully sought, intentional, and incorporated into the study. There is a need to continue creating and using patient advisory groups with the intention of identifying problems and finding solutions alongside the inflammatory bowel disease community.
患者咨询小组对于通过与目标人群进行有意义的互动来指导研究至关重要。尽管患者咨询小组对研究非常有价值,但在炎症性肠病研究中却未得到充分利用。因此,本研究旨在描述一个患者咨询小组的组建和实施情况,并评估研究人员和小组成员的看法。
炎症性肠病综合自我管理研究患者咨询小组于2022年成立。患者咨询小组成员和研究人员通过在线调查完成了公众和患者参与度评估工具。对回复进行主题分析以确定共同主题,并报告描述性统计数据。
由炎症性肠病患者组成的患者咨询小组每季度开会一次。八名成员和三名研究人员对患者咨询小组进行了评估。出现的五个主题是:(1)患者咨询小组成员的生活经历;(2)多样性和代表性;(3)有目的的参与;(4)患者咨询小组的积极方面;(5)患者咨询小组的改进。所有成员都同意或强烈同意会议充分利用了他们的时间,所有研究人员都强烈同意该小组为研究增加了价值。
当有意义地征求、有意地寻求反馈并将其纳入研究时,患者咨询小组可以为成员和研究人员创造独特而积极的体验。有必要继续创建和使用患者咨询小组,以便与炎症性肠病群体一起发现问题并找到解决方案。