Hughto Jaclyn M W, Varma Hiren, Yee Kim, Babbs Gray, Hughes Landon D, Pletta David R, Meyers David J, Shireman Theresa I
Departments of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.
Center for Health Promotion and Health Equity, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
AIDS Care. 2025 Mar;37(3):423-434. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2025.2453831. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Although HIV is more prevalent among transgender and gender-diverse individuals than cisgender people, a dearth of research has compared the HIV-related care engagement of these populations. Using 2008-2017 Medicare data, we identified TGD (trans feminine and non-binary [TFN], trans masculine and non-binary [TMN], unclassified gender) and cisgender (male, female) beneficiaries with HIV and explored within and between gender group differences in the predicted probability of engagement in the HIV Care Continuum. Transgender and gender-diverse individuals had a higher predicted probability of every HIV-related care outcome vs. cisgender individuals, with TFN individuals showing the highest probability of HIV care visit engagement, sexually transmitted infection screening, and antiretroviral treatment receipt and persistence. Notably, except for sexually transmitted infection screening, cisgender females and TMN people had a slightly lower probability of engaging in HIV-related care than TFN people and cisgender males. Although transgender and gender-diverse beneficiaries living with HIV had better engagement in the HIV Care Continuum than cisgender individuals, findings highlight disparities in engagement for TMN individuals and cisgender females, though engagement was still low for Medicare beneficiaries of all genders. Interventions are needed to reduce HIV care engagement barriers for all Medicare beneficiaries.
尽管与顺性别者相比,艾滋病毒在跨性别者和性别多样化个体中更为普遍,但缺乏研究比较这些人群与艾滋病毒相关的护理参与情况。利用2008 - 2017年医疗保险数据,我们确定了感染艾滋病毒的跨性别和性别多样化者(跨女性和非二元性别者[TFN]、跨男性和非二元性别者[TMN]、未分类性别)和顺性别者(男性、女性)受益人,并探讨了性别组内和性别组间在参与艾滋病毒护理连续统一体预测概率方面的差异。与顺性别个体相比,跨性别和性别多样化个体在每项与艾滋病毒相关的护理结果上的预测概率更高,其中TFN个体在艾滋病毒护理就诊参与、性传播感染筛查以及抗逆转录病毒治疗接受和持续方面的概率最高。值得注意的是,除了性传播感染筛查外,顺性别女性和TMN人群参与与艾滋病毒相关护理的概率略低于TFN人群和顺性别男性。尽管感染艾滋病毒的跨性别和性别多样化受益人在艾滋病毒护理连续统一体中的参与情况比顺性别个体更好,但研究结果凸显了TMN个体和顺性别女性在参与方面的差异,不过所有性别的医疗保险受益人的参与率仍然较低。需要采取干预措施来减少所有医疗保险受益人的艾滋病毒护理参与障碍。