Soares Filipa Coutinho, Mouchet Maud, Monnet Anne-Christine, Kjelsberg Nadline, Fernández Alfredo García, Robert Alexandre, Mihoub Jean-Baptiste, Colas Bruno, Sarrazin François
Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Université de Liège, Gembloux, Belgium.
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e14451. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14451. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Conservation translocations are a well-known conservation tool used to reverse the effects of local population extinctions and restore ecosystems. Compared with mammals and birds, plants are underrepresented in translocation programs, and little is known about the potential taxonomic and phylogenetic biases of plant translocation efforts. We aimed to assess how translocated plant species may contribute to the conservation of phylogenetic diversity (PD) among European countries. Focusing on angiosperms across 4 European countries with well-documented flora and comprehensive sampling of translocated plant species, we determined whether species translocations were related to species conservation status with binomial generalized linear mixed models with threat status as a binary response variable. Then, we evaluated the taxonomic and phylogenetic biases of translocated plant species relative to national floras based on PD and evolutionary distinctiveness (ED). To evaluate PD and ED, we constructed null models to assess the deviation of observed values from those expected under a scenario in which translocated species were randomly sampled from the species pool of national floras in each country. Although most species lacked conservation status assessment, plant translocations mainly targeted species with high extinction risk at national, European, and global scales. Although plant orders with a higher representativeness of translocated species also tended to have a higher representativeness of native species, the probability of species being translocated varied significantly across plant order, suggesting a significant taxonomic bias. Based on null models and considering all countries, PD and mean ED of translocated plants were higher than expected by chance in most countries. These results suggest that although translocation programs were implemented independently across countries, the diversity of translocated plant species is relevant to conserving PD from national to continental scales and restoring evolutionarily distinct species when these species succeed. We argue that PD indicators should be incorporated into translocation planning to restore target species' evolutionary trajectories and to contribute to conservation of PD.
保护迁移是一种众所周知的保护手段,用于扭转当地种群灭绝的影响并恢复生态系统。与哺乳动物和鸟类相比,植物在迁移计划中的代表性不足,而且对于植物迁移工作中潜在的分类学和系统发育偏差知之甚少。我们旨在评估迁移的植物物种如何有助于欧洲国家间系统发育多样性(PD)的保护。聚焦于4个拥有记录完备的植物区系且对迁移植物物种进行全面采样的欧洲国家的被子植物,我们使用以威胁状态作为二元响应变量的二项式广义线性混合模型,确定物种迁移是否与物种保护状况相关。然后,我们基于PD和进化独特性(ED)评估了迁移植物物种相对于国家植物区系的分类学和系统发育偏差。为了评估PD和ED,我们构建了零模型,以评估观测值与在每个国家从国家植物区系物种库中随机采样迁移物种的情况下预期值的偏差。尽管大多数物种缺乏保护状况评估,但植物迁移主要针对在国家、欧洲和全球尺度上面临高灭绝风险的物种。尽管迁移物种代表性较高的植物目往往本土物种的代表性也较高,但物种被迁移的概率在不同植物目之间差异显著,这表明存在明显的分类学偏差。基于零模型并考虑所有国家,在大多数国家,迁移植物的PD和平均ED高于随机预期值。这些结果表明,尽管各国独立实施迁移计划,但迁移植物物种的多样性对于从国家到大陆尺度保护PD以及在这些物种成功迁移时恢复进化独特物种具有重要意义。我们认为,应将PD指标纳入迁移规划,以恢复目标物种的进化轨迹并促进PD的保护。