Suppr超能文献

分离的大鼠肝脏溶酶体中短寿命和长寿命蛋白质的降解。pH、温度和蛋白水解抑制剂的影响。

Degradation of short and long lived proteins in isolated rat liver lysosomes. Effects of pH, temperature, and proteolytic inhibitors.

作者信息

Ahlberg J, Berkenstam A, Henell F, Glaumann H

出版信息

J Biol Chem. 1985 May 10;260(9):5847-54.

PMID:3988775
Abstract

Most previous studies on inhibitors of lysosomal protein breakdown have been performed on isolated or cultured cells or on perfused organs. We have tested various inhibitors of proteolysis on lysosomes isolated from livers of rats injected with [14C]leucine 15 min (short labeling time) and 16 h (long labeling time) before killing. Intact lysosomes were incubated with different inhibitors (leupeptin, propylamine, E-64, pepstatin, and chloroquine) in increasing concentrations. None of these caused more than a 40-75% inhibition of proteolysis irrespective of labeling protocol. Chloroquine was the most effective inhibitor, followed by leupeptin, propylamine, E-64, and pepstatin. When lysosomes were incubated with various combinations of inhibitors, including a weak base and an enzyme inhibitor, a somewhat higher inhibition (86%) was obtained. To assess if lysosomes are active in the degradation of both short and long lived proteins, lysosomes were isolated from livers of rats labeled with [14C]leucine for various time intervals. The highest fractional proteolytic rates were seen for short lived proteins. If the recovery of the isolated lysosomes is taken into consideration, about 80% (short labeling time) and 90% (long labeling time) of the total proteolysis in the homogenate could be accounted for by lysosomes. Isolated Golgi, mitochondrial, and microsomal fractions displayed negligible proteolytic activities. The cytosol contributed one-fifth of the total protein breakdown of short lived proteins, whereas insignificant proteolysis was recovered in the cytosolic fraction following long time labeling. Accordingly, we propose that 1) lysosomal inhibitors do not completely suppress proteolysis in isolated lysosomes and that 2) both short and long lived proteins are degraded in lysosomes.

摘要

以往大多数关于溶酶体蛋白降解抑制剂的研究都是在分离或培养的细胞或灌注器官上进行的。我们对从注射了[14C]亮氨酸15分钟(短标记时间)和16小时(长标记时间)后处死的大鼠肝脏中分离出的溶酶体,测试了各种蛋白水解抑制剂。完整的溶酶体与浓度逐渐增加的不同抑制剂(亮抑酶肽、丙胺、E-64、胃蛋白酶抑制剂和氯喹)一起孵育。无论标记方案如何,这些抑制剂均未导致超过40%-75%的蛋白水解抑制。氯喹是最有效的抑制剂,其次是亮抑酶肽、丙胺、E-64和胃蛋白酶抑制剂。当溶酶体与包括弱碱和酶抑制剂在内的各种抑制剂组合孵育时,获得了稍高的抑制率(86%)。为了评估溶酶体在降解短寿命和长寿命蛋白质方面是否具有活性,从用[14C]亮氨酸标记不同时间间隔的大鼠肝脏中分离出溶酶体。短寿命蛋白质的蛋白水解率最高。如果考虑到分离出的溶酶体的回收率,匀浆中总蛋白水解的约80%(短标记时间)和90%(长标记时间)可由溶酶体解释。分离出的高尔基体、线粒体和微粒体部分显示出可忽略不计的蛋白水解活性。胞质溶胶对短寿命蛋白质总蛋白分解的贡献为五分之一,而长时间标记后在胞质溶胶部分回收的蛋白水解可忽略不计。因此,我们提出:1)溶酶体抑制剂不能完全抑制分离出的溶酶体中的蛋白水解;2)短寿命和长寿命蛋白质都在溶酶体中降解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验