• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理结局分类中“输血反应”(代码0700)护理结局的内容效度证据。

Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification.

作者信息

Simoes Adriana Aparecida Timoteo, Lopes Juliana de Lima, Moorhead Sue, Swanson Elizabeth A, Santos Vinicius Batista, de Barros Alba Lucia Bottura Leite

机构信息

Hospital Sirio Libanes, Nursing Paulista School, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Nursing Paulista School, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.70004.

DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.70004
PMID:39887857
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of study was to present evidence of the content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)" nursing outcome from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC).

METHOD

A methodological study was implemented in four phases. The first phase consisted of a narrative literature review in which the main indicators related to blood transfusion were identified: 25 new indicators that were not present in NOC, in addition to 14 existing indicators, for a total of 39 to be studied. In the second phase, conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of NOC indicators were developed. The third phase consisted of analysis of evidence of content validity of conceptual and operational definitions of indicators, through assessment by experts. In the fourth phase, a pilot test was applied to 40 electronic medical records of patients who received blood components and presented with a transfusion reaction.

RESULTS

A total of 27 articles were analyzed and served as support to develop conceptual and operational definitions, and magnitude of indicators, considered for the outcome under study. It was assessed by a group of 10 experts, requiring three rounds to reach the established critical content validity ratio in which four of these indicators were excluded, leaving 35 indicators in the final version. A pilot test on 40 records revealed the presence of 13 indicators, of which six were present in the classification.

CONCLUSION

The conceptual and operational definitions and magnitude developed for the "Blood Transfusion Reaction (code 0700)" nursing outcome demonstrated adequate evidence of content validity in the 21 indicators found in the literature, along with 14 indicators already present in NOC, and 13 of these indicators were present in patients receiving blood components who presented a transfusion reaction.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses can use this nursing outcome as a clinical assessment tool for monitoring blood transfusion recipients' clinical signs.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是提供来自护理结局分类(NOC)中“输血反应(代码0700)”护理结局的概念性和操作性定义的内容效度证据。

方法

一项方法学研究分四个阶段实施。第一阶段包括叙述性文献综述,确定与输血相关的主要指标:NOC中不存在的25个新指标,加上14个现有指标,共计39个指标进行研究。第二阶段,制定概念性和操作性定义以及NOC指标的程度。第三阶段包括通过专家评估分析指标概念性和操作性定义的内容效度证据。第四阶段,对40例接受血液成分且出现输血反应的患者的电子病历进行预试验。

结果

共分析了27篇文章,为所研究结局的概念性和操作性定义以及指标程度的制定提供了支持。由10名专家组成的小组进行评估,需要三轮才能达到既定的关键内容效度比,其中4个指标被排除,最终版本中剩下35个指标。对40份记录的预试验显示存在13个指标,其中6个指标在分类中存在。

结论

为“输血反应(代码0700)”护理结局制定的概念性和操作性定义以及程度,在文献中发现的21个指标、NOC中已有的14个指标以及接受血液成分且出现输血反应的患者中存在的13个指标方面,均显示出足够的内容效度证据。

对实践的启示

护士可将此护理结局用作监测输血受者临床体征的临床评估工具。

相似文献

1
Evidence of content validity of the "Blood Transfusion Reaction" (code 0700) nursing outcome from the nursing outcomes classification.护理结局分类中“输血反应”(代码0700)护理结局的内容效度证据。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jan 29. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.70004.
2
Evidence of content validity of the nursing outcome "sexual functioning" from the nursing outcome classification.来自护理结局分类的护理结局“性功能”的内容效度证据。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2025 Jul;36(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12477. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Conceptual and operational definitions for the indicators of the nursing outcome classification: Symptom control in patients with heart failure in palliative care.护理结局分类指标的概念性和操作性定义:姑息治疗中心力衰竭患者的症状控制
Enferm Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov-Dec;30(6):386-397. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
4
Content analysis of NOC outcomes related to mechanical ventilation in people with COVID-19.分析与 COVID-19 患者机械通气相关的 NOC 结局。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 Apr 5;58:e20230343. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0343en. eCollection 2024.
5
Content validation of the nursing outcome Knowledge Heart Failure Management: Brazilian nurses' opinions.护理结局“心力衰竭管理知识”的内容效度:巴西护士的观点
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Jul;32(3):206-214. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12312. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Validation of Nursing Outcomes Related to Breastfeeding Establishment.母乳喂养建立相关的护理结局验证。
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2020 Apr;31(2):134-144. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12256. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Construction and validation of conceptual and operational definitions of the defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis "Ineffective health self-management" in people living with HIV/AIDS.艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者护理诊断“健康自我管理无效”的界定特征的概念性和操作性定义的构建与验证
Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jul;33(3):169-179. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12345. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
9
Nursing outcome "Severity of infection": conceptual definitions for indicators related to respiratory problems.护理结果“感染严重程度”:与呼吸问题相关指标的概念性定义。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2016 Apr;34(1):38-45. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v34n1a05.
10
Assessment of Neurological Status in Patients with Cerebrovascular Diseases through the Nursing Outcome Classification: A Methodological Study.通过护理结果分类评估脑血管疾病患者的神经功能状态:一项方法学研究。
Nurs Rep. 2022 Mar 2;12(1):152-163. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12010016.