Nickerson Kimberly A, Carranza Christina, Telfer Scott, Ledoux William R, Muir Brittney C
VA RR&D Center for Limb Loss and MoBility (CLiMB), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Mar;18(1):e70034. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70034.
The patient-specific shape of custom accommodative insoles for individuals with diabetes provides full foot-to-insole contact, offloading areas with high plantar pressures and reducing ulceration risk. To design the insole surface, plantar surface shape is captured, traditionally with a foam crush box impression or more recently with 3D scans of the foot. Beyond discrete measurements of the foot, the overall plantar surface shapes obtained from these different methods have yet to be compared, however, differences in the shapes captured by these methods may affect the insole's surface geometry design and subsequent performance.
Plantar surface shapes of 12 individuals with diabetes were captured using a foam crush box, flatbed 3D foot scanner, and handheld 3D scanner. Foot length, width, arch height, and arch volume were measured from each shape-capture method and compared. Mesh-to-mesh distances between the foam crush box mesh and the direct scanning method meshes for each subject were calculated.
Foot length and width measured from the foam crush box scan were greater than the foot length measured from the flatbed scan and handheld scan. The flatbed scan also measured a length and width greater than the handheld scan. Arch heights and volumes from the flatbed scan were less than the heights calculated from the foam crush box and handheld scan. Mesh-to-mesh distances for the flatbed scan and areas of the foot not in contact with the scanner were inferior to the corresponding areas in the foam crush box impression. For the handheld scan, the lateral hindfoot and midfoot were superior, and the medial forefoot was inferior to the foam crush box impression.
Different clinical methods used to capture foot shapes for the design of accommodative insoles may result in different plantar surface shape outputs and therefore impact custom accommodative insole design.
为糖尿病患者定制的适应性鞋垫的特定形状可实现全足底与鞋垫的贴合,减轻足底压力较高区域的负荷并降低溃疡风险。为设计鞋垫表面,传统上采用泡沫压箱印模来获取足底表面形状,最近则采用足部的3D扫描。然而,除了对足部的离散测量外,尚未对通过这些不同方法获得的整体足底表面形状进行比较,这些方法所捕获形状的差异可能会影响鞋垫的表面几何设计及后续性能。
使用泡沫压箱、平板式3D足部扫描仪和手持式3D扫描仪获取12名糖尿病患者的足底表面形状。从每种形状捕获方法测量并比较足长、足宽、足弓高度和足弓容积。计算每个受试者的泡沫压箱网格与直接扫描方法网格之间的网格到网格距离。
通过泡沫压箱扫描测量的足长和足宽大于通过平板扫描和手持式扫描测量的足长。平板扫描测量的长度和宽度也大于手持式扫描。平板扫描的足弓高度和容积小于通过泡沫压箱和手持式扫描计算得出的高度。平板扫描的网格到网格距离以及足部未与扫描仪接触的区域不如泡沫压箱印模中的相应区域。对于手持式扫描,后足外侧和中足优于泡沫压箱印模,而前足内侧则不如泡沫压箱印模。
用于为适应性鞋垫设计捕获足部形状的不同临床方法可能会导致不同的足底表面形状输出,从而影响定制适应性鞋垫的设计。