Leer Jane, Smith Imari Z, Hill Zoelene, Gennetian Lisa A
Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0316680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316680. eCollection 2025.
In the U.S., the federal government and dozens of cities have invested in home visiting programs intended to be universally available at scale to support caregivers of young children. Evaluations find that participation in these programs reduces maternal mortality, improves maternal mental health, and supports children's healthy development. Yet, many parents of young children who are invited to participate in home visiting programs do not enroll. This study fills gaps in the literature by examining how the broader social context affects Black families' engagement in home visiting programs. Via focus groups, survey data from a socioeconomically diverse sample of Black parents across the U.S., and a pre-registered field experiment, we capture views of and experiences with early childhood home visiting programs. We assess the responsiveness of these views to the broader social context and examine implications for interest and participation in home visiting programs. Focus group participants described benefits of home visiting while also expressing concerns about being unfairly judged about their parenting practices and the risk of a home visit resulting in child welfare system involvement. One out of four Black parents surveyed associated the term "home visit" with surveillance (i.e., government scrutiny of parenting), and associating "home visit" with surveillance was empirically correlated with lower participation in home visiting programs. Further, our pre-registered survey experiment showed a causal link between surveillance fears and home visit engagement. Reading a news article about a family's experience with the child welfare system decreased interest in home visiting among Black parents, while labeling a program as "new baby wellness" rather than "home visit" increased interest. Collectively, the findings point to ways in which the broader social context of parenting/parental surveillance negatively affects Black parents' participation in early childhood home visiting programs despite their interest.
在美国,联邦政府和数十个城市都投资开展了家访项目,旨在大规模普及,以支持幼儿照料者。评估发现,参与这些项目可降低孕产妇死亡率、改善孕产妇心理健康状况,并支持儿童的健康发展。然而,许多被邀请参与家访项目的幼儿家长并未登记参加。本研究通过考察更广泛的社会背景如何影响黑人家庭参与家访项目,填补了文献中的空白。通过焦点小组、来自美国社会经济背景各异的黑人家长样本的调查数据,以及一项预先注册的实地实验,我们了解了对幼儿家访项目的看法和经历。我们评估这些看法对更广泛社会背景的反应,并研究其对家访项目兴趣和参与度的影响。焦点小组参与者描述了家访的好处,同时也表达了对育儿方式被不公平评判的担忧,以及家访可能导致儿童福利系统介入的风险。在接受调查的黑人家长中,四分之一的人将“家访”一词与监督(即政府对育儿的审查)联系起来,而将“家访”与监督联系起来在实证上与较低的家访项目参与度相关。此外,我们预先注册的调查实验表明,对监督的恐惧与家访参与之间存在因果关系。阅读一篇关于一个家庭与儿童福利系统经历的新闻文章降低了黑人家长对家访的兴趣,而将一个项目标记为“新生儿健康”而非“家访”则增加了兴趣。总体而言,研究结果指出了育儿/父母监督的更广泛社会背景如何对黑人家长参与幼儿家访项目产生负面影响,尽管他们对此有兴趣。