Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy application in radical esophagectomy surgery: Safety and feasibility: A descriptive study in Vietnam.

Esophageal cancer (EC) ranks as the 7th most prevalent form of cancer and the 6th leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Neoadjuvant therapy, encompassing neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, has shown promise in reducing the staging of EC and mitigating the risk of early systemic spread. This study seeks to assess the safety and viability of implementing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in conjunction with radical esophagectomy surgery for Vietnamese patients diagnosed with locally advanced EC. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events, while feasibility was assessed through indicators such as pathological complete response, major pathological response, and R0 resection rates. The study analyzed data from 30 patients, following specific inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics analysis revealed a participant cohort entirely composed of males, wherein 83.3% were identified as smokers, with tumors predominantly located in the middle (46.7%) and lower (53.3%) regions of the thoracic esophagus. The predominance of clinical stages II and III was observed. The nCRT protocol resulted in a substantial reduction in dysphagia score, with a statistically significant P < .001. The median duration from the conclusion of radiation treatment to surgery was 62 days, with a median operative time of 302 minutes and a median estimated blood loss of 189 mL. Surgical complications primarily included anastomotic leakage and pneumonia, occurring in 23.3% and 16.7% of cases, respectively. R0 resection was achieved in 29 (96.7%) patients, with 43.4% attaining pathological complete response and 56.7% demonstrating tumor complete response. The study's outcomes emphasize the safety and feasibility of employing esophagectomy subsequent to nCRT in Vietnamese patients, as evidenced by the absence of mortality, low complication rates, and favorable surgical results. It also suggests the potential advantages of utilizing a lower daily Gy dose for enhanced safety and considering squamous cell carcinoma as a specific criterion for nCRT.