Palermi Andrea, Molinari Lorenzo Vilhelm, Ricci Fabrizio, Gallina Sabina, Renda Giulia
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy.
Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy; Heart Department, SS. Annunziata Hospital, University Cardiology Division, Chieti, Italy; Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, G. D'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti 66100, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms gata 35, Malmö 214 28, Sweden.
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2025 Apr;50(4):102995. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.102995. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia, portends higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and is associated with quantifiable impairment in quality of life. While physical activity is widely recognized for its cardiovascular benefits, recent evidence challenges its role in the development of AF.
Emerging data suggest a U-shaped relationship between physical activity and AF risk. Mild to moderate exercise appears protective, whereas prolonged, high-intensity activity is associated with an increased risk, possibly driven by cardiac remodeling, autonomic alterations, and atrial substrate changes typical of the so-called athlete's heart. This relationship is further modulated by other factors, including genetic predisposition, acquired cardiac conditions, and stimulant use. With the growing participation of aging populations in sports, the clinical management of AF in athletes presents unique challenges. Pharmacological strategies for rhythm and rate control may conflict with performance goals, and the use of anticoagulants must be carefully balanced against the risk of traumatic bleeding in contact sports. Recent evidence supports strategies such as short-term anticoagulant withdrawal to mitigate hemorrhagic risk while maintaining thromboembolic protection. A personalized approach, incorporating shared decision-making, is essential, particularly for elite athletes.
While regular physical activity generally confers cardiovascular benefits, prolonged intense exercise bouts may paradoxically increase the risk of AF. The evaluation and management of AF in athletes require a tailored, multidisciplinary approach that accounts for the distinct needs of this population.
心房颤动(AF)是最常见的持续性心律失常,预示着心血管疾病发病率和死亡率更高,并且与生活质量的可量化损害相关。虽然体育活动因其对心血管的益处而被广泛认可,但最近的证据对其在房颤发生中的作用提出了挑战。
新出现的数据表明体育活动与房颤风险之间呈U形关系。轻度至中度运动似乎具有保护作用,而长时间的高强度活动则与风险增加相关,这可能是由心脏重塑、自主神经改变以及所谓运动员心脏典型的心房基质变化所驱动的。这种关系还受到其他因素的进一步调节,包括遗传易感性、后天性心脏病和兴奋剂使用。随着老年人群越来越多地参与体育运动,运动员房颤的临床管理带来了独特的挑战。节律和心率控制的药物策略可能与运动表现目标相冲突,并且抗凝剂的使用必须在接触性运动中创伤性出血风险之间仔细权衡。最近的证据支持短期停用抗凝剂等策略,以降低出血风险同时维持血栓栓塞保护。采用个性化方法,纳入共同决策,至关重要,尤其是对于精英运动员。
虽然定期体育活动通常会带来心血管益处,但长时间的剧烈运动可能反常地增加房颤风险。运动员房颤的评估和管理需要一种量身定制的多学科方法,该方法要考虑到这一人群的独特需求。