• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜与开放腰椎手术术后患者恢复情况:使用可穿戴传感器对术后活动能力和步态模式进行客观分析

Patient Recovery Following Uniportal Endoscopic Vs Open Lumbar Spine Surgery: Objective Analysis of Postoperative Mobility and Gait Patterns Using Wearable Sensors.

作者信息

Ma Alison, Mobbs Ralph J, Maharaj Monish M

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney NSW, Australia

NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Randwick NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):39-48. doi: 10.14444/8718.

DOI:10.14444/8718
PMID:39890425
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12053096/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a gradual shift from open spine surgery to minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic spine surgery to reduce approach-related trauma, collateral damage, and complications. While recovery following surgery has been measured using subjective measures including patient-reported outcome measures, the introduction of smart wearable devices now provides both an objective and continuous method of patient assessment. This prospective study compares patient recovery after uniportal endoscopic and open lumbar spine surgery by analyzing mobility and gait metrics captured by a wearable sensor.

METHODS

Participants included 24 patients who underwent a single-level uniportal endoscopic lumbar decompression or open posterior lumbar fusion. During the first 48 hours after surgery, patients wore a sensor that continuously monitored position, step count, and gait metrics.

RESULTS

In the immediate postoperative period, endoscopic spine surgery patients experienced a quicker return to mobility, with less time lying down, higher step count, faster gait velocity, lower double support percentage, and reduced variability, compared with open spine surgery patients.

CONCLUSION

There are key differences in patient mobility and gait following uniportal endoscopic and open spine surgery. Endoscopic spine surgery patients had faster recovery, which can guide resource allocation toward the development of training programs and support the advancement of spine endoscopy to address a broader range of pathologies. This pilot study highlights the potential for wearable devices to be used in further studies to form spine surgery recovery trajectories, allowing targeted rehabilitation and prompt intervention for deviations in patient recovery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates the benefits of endoscopic spine surgery for improved postoperative recovery in terms of mobility and gait metrics. Additionally, it highlights the potential for wearable sensor technology to provide an objective and continuous method for assessing postoperative outcomes and for the development of individualized rehabilitation protocols. These findings support the broader adoption of endoscopic techniques and emphasize the value of incorporating wearable devices into postoperative monitoring to optimize patient care.

摘要

背景

脊柱手术已逐渐从开放手术转向微创技术,如内镜脊柱手术,以减少手术相关创伤、附带损伤和并发症。虽然术后恢复情况一直通过主观指标进行衡量,包括患者报告的结局指标,但智能可穿戴设备的出现现在提供了一种客观且连续的患者评估方法。这项前瞻性研究通过分析可穿戴传感器捕获的移动性和步态指标,比较了单孔内镜和开放腰椎手术后患者的恢复情况。

方法

参与者包括24例接受单节段单孔内镜腰椎减压或开放后路腰椎融合术的患者。在手术后的头48小时内,患者佩戴一个传感器,该传感器持续监测位置、步数和步态指标。

结果

与开放脊柱手术患者相比,内镜脊柱手术患者在术后即刻恢复移动性更快,躺卧时间更少,步数更多,步态速度更快,双支撑百分比更低,变异性更小。

结论

单孔内镜和开放脊柱手术后患者的移动性和步态存在关键差异。内镜脊柱手术患者恢复更快,这可以指导资源分配用于培训项目的开发,并支持脊柱内镜技术的进步以应对更广泛的病理情况。这项初步研究强调了可穿戴设备在进一步研究中用于形成脊柱手术恢复轨迹的潜力,从而允许针对患者恢复偏差进行有针对性的康复和及时干预。

临床意义

本研究证明了内镜脊柱手术在改善术后移动性和步态指标恢复方面的益处。此外,它强调了可穿戴传感器技术提供客观且连续的术后结局评估方法以及开发个性化康复方案的潜力。这些发现支持更广泛地采用内镜技术,并强调将可穿戴设备纳入术后监测以优化患者护理的价值。

相似文献

1
Patient Recovery Following Uniportal Endoscopic Vs Open Lumbar Spine Surgery: Objective Analysis of Postoperative Mobility and Gait Patterns Using Wearable Sensors.单孔腹腔镜与开放腰椎手术术后患者恢复情况:使用可穿戴传感器对术后活动能力和步态模式进行客观分析
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Mar 6;19(1):39-48. doi: 10.14444/8718.
2
Ambulatory uniportal versus biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis-cohort study using a prospective registry.门诊单通道与双通道内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症——一项使用前瞻性登记系统的队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug;32(8):2726-2735. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07620-9. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
3
Continuous data capture of gait and mobility metrics using wearable devices for postoperative monitoring in common elective orthopaedic procedures of the hip, knee, and spine: a scoping review.使用可穿戴设备连续捕获步态和移动性指标,用于髋关节、膝关节和脊柱常见择期骨科手术的术后监测:范围综述。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Oct 31;18(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04303-5.
4
The Evolution and Advancement of Endoscopic Foraminal Surgery: One Surgeon's Experience Incorporating Adjunctive Techologies.内镜下椎间孔手术的发展与进步:一位外科医生应用辅助技术的经验
SAS J. 2007 Aug 1;1(3):108-17. doi: 10.1016/SASJ-2006-0014-RR. eCollection 2007.
5
Comparative analysis of three types of minimally invasive decompressive surgery for lumbar central stenosis: biportal endoscopy, uniportal endoscopy, and microsurgery.三种微创减压手术治疗腰椎中央型狭窄的对比分析:双通道内镜、单通道内镜和显微镜手术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E9. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS197.
6
Proposed objective scoring algorithm for assessment and intervention recovery following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis based on relevant gait metrics from wearable devices: the Gait Posture index (GPi).基于可穿戴设备相关步态指标的腰椎管狭窄症手术后评估及干预恢复的客观评分算法建议:步态姿势指数(GPi)
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(3):300-309. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.06.
7
Remodeling Pattern of Spinal Canal after Full Endoscopic Uniportal Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression: One Year Repetitive MRI and Clinical Follow-Up Evaluation.全内镜下单侧椎板切开双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症术后椎管重塑模式:一年期重复MRI及临床随访评估
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;12(4):793. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040793.
8
Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Comprehensive Review.单孔内镜下腰椎管狭窄症椎间孔减压术:综述
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(suppl 3):S54-S64. doi: 10.14444/8164.
9
Spine patient care with wearable medical technology: state-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges: a systematic review.可穿戴医疗技术在脊柱患者护理中的应用:现状、机遇和挑战:系统评价。
Spine J. 2023 Jul;23(7):929-944. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.02.020. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
10
Postoperative Transient Neurogenic Claudication After Lumbar Endoscopic Decompression: The Role of Floseal in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.腰椎内镜减压术后的术后短暂性神经源性跛行:弗洛西尔在微创脊柱手术中的作用
Cureus. 2024 Nov 5;16(11):e73083. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73083. eCollection 2024 Nov.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional endoscopy in lumbar spine surgery as a novel approach for degenerative pathologies: a case report.腰椎手术中的三维内镜检查作为一种治疗退行性病变的新方法:病例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Aug 28;2024(8):rjae540. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae540. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Comparative Review of the Socioeconomic Burden of Lower Back Pain in the United States and Globally.美国与全球下背痛社会经济负担的比较性综述
Neurospine. 2024 Jun;21(2):487-501. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448372.186. Epub 2024 Jun 30.
3
Australian Spine Surgeon's Perspectives on Endoscopic Spine Surgery: An In-depth Analysis.澳大利亚脊柱外科医生对脊柱内镜手术的观点:深入分析
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1321-1327. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346912.456. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
4
Decompression unilateral biportal endoscopy for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: A comparative study with decompression open discectomy.单侧双门孔内镜减压治疗重度退行性腰椎管狭窄症:与开放式椎间盘切除术减压的比较研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 22;14:1132698. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1132698. eCollection 2023.
5
Accuracy of Pain Tolerance Self-assessment Versus Objective Pressure Sensitivity.疼痛耐受力自我评估与客观压力敏感性的准确性比较。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 May 1;31(9):e465-e472. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00500. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
6
Early Clinical Efficacy of Endo-TLIF in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation.椎间孔镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的早期临床疗效
Z Orthop Unfall. 2022 Dec;160(6):670-678. doi: 10.1055/a-1795-4038. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
7
Walking orientation randomness metric (WORM) score: pilot study of a novel gait parameter to assess walking stability and discriminate fallers from non-fallers using wearable sensors.步行方向随机性指标(WORM)评分:一项初步研究,该研究采用一种新的步态参数,利用可穿戴传感器评估步行稳定性并区分跌倒者和非跌倒者。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 29;23(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05211-1.
8
Full endoscopic versus open discectomy for sciatica: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.全内镜与开放椎间盘切除术治疗坐骨神经痛:随机对照非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 21;376:e065846. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065846.
9
Postoperative physical activity in orthogeriatric patients - new insights with continuous monitoring.老年骨科患者术后的体力活动 - 连续监测的新见解。
Injury. 2020 Mar;51(3):628-632. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.01.041. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness and outcome of microendoscopic and open discectomy in patients suffering from lumbar disc herniation.腰椎间盘突出症患者接受显微内镜下与开放性椎间盘切除术的疗效及结果比较。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e16627. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016627.