Holton Eleanor, van Opheusden Bas, Grohn Jan, Ward Harry, Grogan John, Lockwood Patricia L, Ma Ili, Ma Wei Ji, Manohar Sanjay G
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom
Imbue, Inc., San Francisco, California 94114.
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19;45(12):e1814242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1814-24.2025.
Damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) in humans disrupts planning abilities in naturalistic settings. However, it is unknown which components of planning are affected in these patients, including selecting the relevant information, simulating future states, or evaluating between these states. To address this question, we leveraged computational paradigms to investigate the role of vmPFC in planning, using the board game task "Four-in-a-Row" (18 lesion patients, 9 female; 30 healthy control participants, 16 female) and the simpler "Two-Step" task measuring model-based reasoning (49 lesion patients, 27 female; 20 healthy control participants, 13 female). Damage to vmPFC disrupted performance in Four-in-a-Row compared with both control lesion patients and healthy age-matched controls. We leveraged a computational framework to assess different component processes of planning in Four-in-a-Row and found that impairments following vmPFC damage included shallower planning depth and a tendency to overlook game-relevant features. In the "Two-Step" task, which involves binary choices across a short future horizon, we found little evidence of planning in all groups and no behavioral differences between groups. Complex yet computationally tractable tasks such as "Four-in-a-Row" offer novel opportunities for characterizing neuropsychological planning impairments, which in vmPFC patients we find are associated with oversights and reduced planning depth.
人类腹内侧前额叶皮层(vmPFC)受损会破坏自然环境中的规划能力。然而,尚不清楚这些患者规划的哪些组成部分受到影响,包括选择相关信息、模拟未来状态或在这些状态之间进行评估。为了解决这个问题,我们利用计算范式来研究vmPFC在规划中的作用,使用棋盘游戏任务“四子连珠”(18名病变患者,9名女性;30名健康对照参与者,16名女性)和更简单的基于模型推理的“两步”任务(49名病变患者,27名女性;20名健康对照参与者,13名女性)。与对照病变患者和年龄匹配的健康对照相比,vmPFC损伤会破坏“四子连珠”任务的表现。我们利用一个计算框架来评估“四子连珠”任务中规划的不同组成过程,发现vmPFC损伤后的缺陷包括规划深度较浅和忽视与游戏相关特征的倾向。在“两步”任务中,该任务涉及在较短的未来范围内进行二元选择,我们发现所有组中几乎没有规划的证据,且组间没有行为差异。像“四子连珠”这样复杂但计算上易于处理的任务为表征神经心理学规划损伤提供了新的机会,我们发现vmPFC患者的这些损伤与疏忽和规划深度降低有关。