• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业知识增加人类游戏玩法的规划深度。

Expertise increases planning depth in human gameplay.

机构信息

Center for Neural Science and Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7967):1000-1005. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06124-2. Epub 2023 May 31.

DOI:10.1038/s41586-023-06124-2
PMID:37258667
Abstract

A hallmark of human intelligence is the ability to plan multiple steps into the future. Despite decades of research, it is still debated whether skilled decision-makers plan more steps ahead than novices. Traditionally, the study of expertise in planning has used board games such as chess, but the complexity of these games poses a barrier to quantitative estimates of planning depth. Conversely, common planning tasks in cognitive science often have a lower complexity and impose a ceiling for the depth to which any player can plan. Here we investigate expertise in a complex board game that offers ample opportunity for skilled players to plan deeply. We use model fitting methods to show that human behaviour can be captured using a computational cognitive model based on heuristic search. To validate this model, we predict human choices, response times and eye movements. We also perform a Turing test and a reconstruction experiment. Using the model, we find robust evidence for increased planning depth with expertise in both laboratory and large-scale mobile data. Experts memorize and reconstruct board features more accurately. Using complex tasks combined with precise behavioural modelling might expand our understanding of human planning and help to bridge the gap with progress in artificial intelligence.

摘要

人类智力的一个标志是能够规划未来的多个步骤。尽管已经进行了几十年的研究,但熟练决策者是否比新手规划更多步骤仍存在争议。传统上,规划领域的专业知识研究使用国际象棋等棋盘游戏,但这些游戏的复杂性为规划深度的定量估计设置了障碍。相反,认知科学中的常见规划任务通常具有较低的复杂性,并对任何玩家可以规划的深度施加上限。在这里,我们研究了一种复杂棋盘游戏中的专业知识,为熟练玩家提供了充分的深度规划机会。我们使用模型拟合方法来表明,可以使用基于启发式搜索的计算认知模型来捕获人类行为。为了验证这个模型,我们预测了人类的选择、反应时间和眼球运动。我们还进行了图灵测试和重建实验。使用该模型,我们在实验室和大规模移动数据中都发现了与专业知识相关的深度规划增加的有力证据。专家更准确地记忆和重建棋盘特征。使用复杂的任务结合精确的行为建模可能会扩展我们对人类规划的理解,并有助于弥合与人工智能进展之间的差距。

相似文献

1
Expertise increases planning depth in human gameplay.专业知识增加人类游戏玩法的规划深度。
Nature. 2023 Jun;618(7967):1000-1005. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06124-2. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
Chess players' eye movements reveal rapid recognition of complex visual patterns: Evidence from a chess-related visual search task.国际象棋棋手的眼动揭示了对复杂视觉模式的快速识别:来自一项与国际象棋相关的视觉搜索任务的证据。
J Vis. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):4. doi: 10.1167/17.3.4.
3
Planning abilities and chess: a comparison of chess and non-chess players on the Tower of London task.规划能力与国际象棋:伦敦塔任务中棋手与非棋手的比较
Br J Psychol. 2006 Aug;97(Pt 3):299-311. doi: 10.1348/000712605X71407.
4
Video games and board games: Effects of playing practice on cognition.电子游戏和棋盘游戏:游戏练习对认知的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 27;18(3):e0283654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283654. eCollection 2023.
5
Searching for answers: expert pattern recognition and planning.寻找答案:专家模式识别与规划。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Sep;27(9):788-790. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.07.006. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
6
The determinants of response time in a repeated constant-sum game: A robust Bayesian hierarchical dual-process model.重复常数和博弈中反应时间的决定因素:稳健的贝叶斯层级双过程模型。
Cognition. 2018 Mar;172:107-123. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
Six Suggestions for Research on Games in Cognitive Science.认知科学中游戏研究的六点建议。
Top Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;9(2):497-509. doi: 10.1111/tops.12267.
8
People construct simplified mental representations to plan.人们构建简化的心理表征来进行规划。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7912):129-136. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04743-9. Epub 2022 May 19.
9
Visual search in ecological and non-ecological displays: evidence for a non-monotonic effect of complexity on performance.生态和非生态显示中的视觉搜索:复杂度对表现的非单调影响的证据。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053420. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
10
Complexity, attention, and choice in games under time constraints: A process analysis.时间限制下游戏中的复杂性、注意力与选择:一项过程分析
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Oct;44(10):1609-1640. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000535. Epub 2018 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Accurate Predictions Facilitate Robust Memory Encoding Independently From Stimulus Probability.准确的预测有助于独立于刺激概率进行稳健的记忆编码。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jul 26;9:940-958. doi: 10.1162/opmi.a.14. eCollection 2025.
2
Humans learn generalizable representations through efficient coding.人类通过高效编码学习可泛化的表征。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 29;16(1):3989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58848-6.
3
Adaptive planning depth in human problem-solving.人类问题解决中的适应性规划深度。

本文引用的文献

1
Schema-based predictive eye movements support sequential memory encoding.基于图式的预测性眼球运动支持序列记忆编码。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82599. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82599.
2
Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.人类规划中的认知资源的合理利用。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1112-1125. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01332-8. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
3
Planning in the brain.大脑中的计划。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):241161. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241161. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Backward reasoning through AND/OR trees to solve problems.通过与/或树进行逆向推理来解决问题。
Cogsci. 2024;46:4402-4409.
5
Disentangling the Component Processes in Complex Planning Impairments Following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.解析腹内侧前额叶损伤后复杂规划障碍中的组成过程
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19;45(12):e1814242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1814-24.2025.
6
Cost-benefit tradeoff mediates the transition from rule-based to memory-based processing during practice.在练习过程中,成本效益权衡介导了从基于规则的处理到基于记忆的处理的转变。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Jan 23;23(1):e3002987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002987. eCollection 2025 Jan.
7
Expert navigators deploy rational complexity-based decision precaching for large-scale real-world planning.专业导航器为大规模实际规划部署基于合理复杂性的决策预缓存。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jan 28;122(4):e2407814122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407814122. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
8
Approximate planning in spatial search.空间搜索中的近似规划。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Nov 12;20(11):e1012582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012582. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Building machines that learn and think with people.与人类一起学习和思考的机器。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1851-1863. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01991-9. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
10
The role of training variability for model-based and model-free learning of an arbitrary visuomotor mapping.基于模型和无模型学习任意视动映射的训练变异性的作用。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 27;20(9):e1012471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012471. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Neuron. 2022 Mar 16;110(6):914-934. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.018. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
4
Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling.基于逆二项抽样的无偏和高效对数似然估计。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Dec 23;16(12):e1008483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008483. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Superhuman AI for multiplayer poker.用于多人扑克的超级人工智能。
Science. 2019 Aug 30;365(6456):885-890. doi: 10.1126/science.aay2400. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
6
A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play.一种通过自我对弈掌握国际象棋、将棋和围棋的通用强化学习算法。
Science. 2018 Dec 7;362(6419):1140-1144. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6404.
7
Prospection, Perseverance, and Insight in Sequential Behavior.序贯行为中的展望、坚持和洞察。
Neuron. 2018 Sep 5;99(5):1069-1082.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.018.
8
Dorsal hippocampus contributes to model-based planning.背侧海马体有助于基于模型的规划。
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Sep;20(9):1269-1276. doi: 10.1038/nn.4613. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
9
Chronic Exposure to Methamphetamine Disrupts Reinforcement-Based Decision Making in Rats.慢性暴露于甲基苯丙胺会破坏大鼠基于强化的决策制定。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Mar;43(4):770-780. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.159. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Chess players' eye movements reveal rapid recognition of complex visual patterns: Evidence from a chess-related visual search task.国际象棋棋手的眼动揭示了对复杂视觉模式的快速识别:来自一项与国际象棋相关的视觉搜索任务的证据。
J Vis. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):4. doi: 10.1167/17.3.4.