• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类规划中的认知资源的合理利用。

Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1112-1125. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01332-8. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-022-01332-8
PMID:35484209
Abstract

Making good decisions requires thinking ahead, but the huge number of actions and outcomes one could consider makes exhaustive planning infeasible for computationally constrained agents, such as humans. How people are nevertheless able to solve novel problems when their actions have long-reaching consequences is thus a long-standing question in cognitive science. To address this question, we propose a model of resource-constrained planning that allows us to derive optimal planning strategies. We find that previously proposed heuristics such as best-first search are near optimal under some circumstances but not others. In a mouse-tracking paradigm, we show that people adapt their planning strategies accordingly, planning in a manner that is broadly consistent with the optimal model but not with any single heuristic model. We also find systematic deviations from the optimal model that might result from additional cognitive constraints that are yet to be uncovered.

摘要

做出明智的决策需要提前思考,但对于计算能力受限的主体(例如人类)而言,需要考虑的行动和结果数量巨大,因此详尽的规划是不可行的。那么,当人们的行为具有深远影响时,他们如何能够解决新问题,这是认知科学中长期存在的一个问题。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种资源受限规划模型,该模型允许我们推导出最佳规划策略。我们发现,以前提出的启发式算法(例如最佳优先搜索)在某些情况下接近最优,但在其他情况下则不然。在鼠标跟踪范式中,我们表明人们会相应地调整其规划策略,以与最佳模型大致一致但与任何单个启发式模型都不一致的方式进行规划。我们还发现与最优模型存在系统偏差,这可能是由于尚未发现的其他认知限制所致。

相似文献

1
Rational use of cognitive resources in human planning.人类规划中的认知资源的合理利用。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Aug;6(8):1112-1125. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01332-8. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
2
Identifying resource-rational heuristics for risky choice.识别风险选择的资源理性启发式。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Jul;131(4):905-951. doi: 10.1037/rev0000456. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Dynamic integration of forward planning and heuristic preferences during multiple goal pursuit.在多目标追求过程中,前瞻性规划和启发式偏好的动态整合。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Feb 18;16(2):e1007685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007685. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Fast or frugal, but not both: Decision heuristics under time pressure.快速或节俭,但不能兼顾:时间压力下的决策启发式
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):24-33. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000419. Epub 2017 May 29.
5
The complementary role of affect-based and cognitive heuristics to make decisions under conditions of ambivalence and complexity.在矛盾和复杂的情况下,基于情感和认知启发式的互补作用来做出决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0206724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206724. eCollection 2018.
6
People construct simplified mental representations to plan.人们构建简化的心理表征来进行规划。
Nature. 2022 Jun;606(7912):129-136. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04743-9. Epub 2022 May 19.
7
The anchoring bias reflects rational use of cognitive resources.锚定偏差反映了认知资源的理性使用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):322-349. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1286-8.
8
Heuristic decision making.启发式决策。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:451-82. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346.
9
Resource-rational analysis: Understanding human cognition as the optimal use of limited computational resources.资源理性分析:将人类认知理解为对有限计算资源的最佳利用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Feb 4;43:e1. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1900061X.
10
Vervet monkeys use paths consistent with context-specific spatial movement heuristics.绿猴使用与特定情境空间移动启发法一致的路径。
Ecol Evol. 2015 Oct 5;5(20):4706-16. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1755. eCollection 2015 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational basis of hierarchical and counterfactual information processing.分层与反事实信息处理的计算基础。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02232-3.
2
Heuristic pruning of decision trees at low probabilities and probability discounting in sequential planning in young and older adults.年轻人和老年人在顺序规划中基于低概率的决策树启发式剪枝及概率折扣
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16260. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00905-7.
3
Early versus late noise differentially enhances or degrades context-dependent choice.早期噪声与晚期噪声对情境依赖选择的增强或削弱作用存在差异。

本文引用的文献

1
Formalizing planning and information search in naturalistic decision-making.自然决策中的规划与信息搜索形式化。
Nat Neurosci. 2021 Aug;24(8):1051-1064. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00866-w. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
2
More why, less how: What we need from models of cognition.更多的“为什么”,更少的“怎么做”:我们需要认知模型提供什么。
Cognition. 2021 Aug;213:104688. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104688. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
3
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.简单选择中的注视模式反映了最优信息采样。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 23;16(1):3828. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59140-3.
4
Adaptive planning depth in human problem-solving.人类问题解决中的适应性规划深度。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Apr 9;12(4):241161. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241161. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Information-Seeking Decision Strategies Mitigate Risk in Dynamic, Uncertain Environments.信息寻求决策策略可降低动态、不确定环境中的风险。
ArXiv. 2025 Mar 24:arXiv:2503.19107v1.
6
Backward reasoning through AND/OR trees to solve problems.通过与/或树进行逆向推理来解决问题。
Cogsci. 2024;46:4402-4409.
7
Disentangling the Component Processes in Complex Planning Impairments Following Ventromedial Prefrontal Lesions.解析腹内侧前额叶损伤后复杂规划障碍中的组成过程
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 19;45(12):e1814242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1814-24.2025.
8
Approximate planning in spatial search.空间搜索中的近似规划。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Nov 12;20(11):e1012582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012582. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Building machines that learn and think with people.与人类一起学习和思考的机器。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Oct;8(10):1851-1863. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01991-9. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
10
Replay shapes abstract cognitive maps for efficient social navigation.重放塑造用于高效社交导航的抽象认知图。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2156-2167. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01990-w. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 26;17(3):e1008863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.最优注意调节决策策略解释了人类的凝视行为。
Elife. 2021 Mar 26;10:e63436. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63436.
5
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python.SciPy 1.0:Python 中的科学计算基础算法。
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
6
Optimal policy for multi-alternative decisions.多选择决策的最优策略。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Sep;22(9):1503-1511. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0453-9. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
7
Mental labour.脑力劳动。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0401-9. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
8
Optimizing the depth and the direction of prospective planning using information values.利用信息值优化前瞻性规划的深度和方向。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Mar 12;15(3):e1006827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006827. eCollection 2019 Mar.
9
Prioritized memory access explains planning and hippocampal replay.优先化的记忆访问解释了规划和海马体重放。
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Nov;21(11):1609-1617. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0232-z. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Suboptimality in perceptual decision making.感知决策中的次优性。
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Feb 27;41:e223. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000936.