Khoury Christine F, Ferrone Michael, Runyan Caroline A
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;45(11):e1385242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1385-24.2025.
The structure of local circuits is highly conserved across the cortex, yet the spatial and temporal properties of population activity differ fundamentally in sensory-level and association-level areas. In the sensory cortex, population activity has a shorter timescale and decays sharply over distance, supporting a population code for the fine-scale features of sensory stimuli. In the association cortex, population activity has a longer timescale and spreads over wider distances, a code that is suited to holding information in memory and driving behavior. We tested whether these differences in activity dynamics could be explained by differences in network structure. We targeted photostimulations to single excitatory neurons of layer 2/3, while monitoring surrounding population activity using two-photon calcium imaging. Experiments were performed in the auditory (AC) and posterior parietal cortex (PPC) within the same mice of both sexes, which also expressed a red fluorophore in somatostatin-expressing interneurons (SOM). In both cortical regions, photostimulations resulted in a spatially restricted zone of positive influence on neurons closely neighboring the targeted neuron and a more spatially diffuse zone of negative influence affecting more distant neurons (akin to a network-level "suppressive surround"). However, the relative spatial extents of positive and negative influence were different in AC and PPC. In PPC, the central zone of positive influence was wider, but the negative suppressive surround was more narrow than in AC, which could account for the larger-scale network dynamics in PPC. The more narrow central positive influence zone and wider suppressive surround in AC could serve to sharpen sensory representations.
局部回路的结构在整个皮层中高度保守,然而,群体活动的时空特性在感觉水平和联合水平区域存在根本差异。在感觉皮层中,群体活动的时间尺度较短,且随距离急剧衰减,这支持了一种用于编码感觉刺激精细特征的群体编码。在联合皮层中,群体活动的时间尺度较长,且传播距离更广,这种编码适合于在记忆中保存信息并驱动行为。我们测试了这些活动动态的差异是否可以用网络结构的差异来解释。我们将光刺激靶向第2/3层的单个兴奋性神经元,同时使用双光子钙成像监测周围的群体活动。实验在雌雄同体的同一小鼠的听觉皮层(AC)和顶叶后皮层(PPC)中进行,这些小鼠在表达生长抑素的中间神经元(SOM)中也表达红色荧光团。在两个皮层区域中,光刺激对与靶向神经元紧邻的神经元产生了一个空间受限的正向影响区域,以及一个对更远距离神经元产生影响的空间扩散更广的负向影响区域(类似于网络水平的“抑制性周边”)。然而,AC和PPC中正向和负向影响的相对空间范围是不同的。在PPC中,正向影响的中心区域更宽,但负向抑制性周边比AC中更窄,这可以解释PPC中更大尺度的网络动态。AC中更窄的中心正向影响区域和更宽的抑制性周边可能有助于锐化感觉表征。