Chang Enxue, Jia Yanni, Zhu Xiaoying, Wang Lunan, Yan Ying, Liu Kejun, Huang Weidong
School of Health Management, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
School of Elderly Care Services and Management, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2025 May;9(3):399-413. doi: 10.1007/s41669-025-00559-1. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
Little is known about the diversity of residents' preferences for COVID-19 vaccines during the time when COVID-19 management was downgraded in China. This study aims to investigate these preferences using discrete choice experiment (DCE) and profile case best-worst scaling (BWS-2), and to assess the concordance between these two methods.
Chinese residents recruited for the online survey were asked to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine profiles through both DCE and BWS-2 from April to July 2023. Attributes included effectiveness, duration of protection, risk of severe adverse events (degree), the total out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, brand, and the vaccination method. We utilized conditional regression and mixed logit regression models to estimate the preference levels for potential attributes. To assess preference concordance between the two methods, re-scaling and the Spearman correlation test were used. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the most suitable method for different population groups, categorized by vaccine hesitancy and risk level.
A total of 438 (71.22%) respondents were included. A similar pattern was found in the DCE and BWS-2 methods, with the respondents having a strong preference for 90% vaccine effectiveness. However, the methods diverged in other preferences; DCE favored domestic brands and low severe adverse event risk, while BWS-2 preferred moderate risk and three years of protection. Concordance assessment, including Spearman's correlation and linear regression, showed no significant correlation and poor concordance between the methods, underscoring these differences. Preference heterogeneity is revealed among different groups; however, effectiveness remained the most important attribute for all subgroups of the population. Oral vaccination was the preferred option for both the vaccine-hesitant and high-risk groups.
This study offers new insights into the varying preferences for COVID-19 vaccines among Chinese residents following the downgrading of pandemic management measures. The findings underscore the need for diverse strategies in vaccine policy design. Special emphasis should be placed on vaccine attributes that align with public priorities, such as high effectiveness and low risk levels, to enhance vaccine uptake.
在中国新冠疫情防控措施降级期间,居民对新冠疫苗偏好的多样性鲜为人知。本研究旨在使用离散选择实验(DCE)和简式案例最佳-最差尺度法(BWS-2)调查这些偏好,并评估这两种方法之间的一致性。
2023年4月至7月,招募参与在线调查的中国居民通过DCE和BWS-2对新冠疫苗概况进行评估。属性包括有效性、保护期、严重不良事件风险(程度)、自付总费用、品牌和接种方式。我们使用条件回归和混合逻辑回归模型来估计潜在属性的偏好水平。为评估两种方法之间的偏好一致性,使用了重新缩放和Spearman相关性检验。此外,进行了亚组分析,以确定针对不同人群组(按疫苗犹豫程度和风险水平分类)最合适的方法。
共纳入438名(71.22%)受访者。在DCE和BWS-2方法中发现了类似模式,受访者对90%的疫苗有效性有强烈偏好。然而,在其他偏好方面,两种方法存在差异;DCE倾向于国产品牌和低严重不良事件风险,而BWS-2则更喜欢中等风险和三年的保护期。包括Spearman相关性和线性回归在内的一致性评估表明,两种方法之间无显著相关性且一致性较差,凸显了这些差异。不同群体之间存在偏好异质性;然而,有效性仍然是所有亚人群组最重要的属性。口服接种是疫苗犹豫者和高风险组的首选。
本研究为疫情防控措施降级后中国居民对新冠疫苗的不同偏好提供了新见解。研究结果强调了疫苗政策设计中采用多样化策略的必要性。应特别强调与公众优先事项相符的疫苗属性,如高有效性和低风险水平,以提高疫苗接种率。