• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息不对称条件下老年医疗公私合作中私营部门行为的演化博弈模型

Evolutionary game model for the behavior of private sectors in elderly healthcare public-private partnership under the condition of information asymmetry.

作者信息

Yue Xianghua, Durrani Shahzad Khan, Li Runfa, Liu Wenling, Manzoor Shahid, Anser Muhammad Khalid

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, 423000, PR China.

School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12321-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12321-8
PMID:39891183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11783943/
Abstract

Chinese elderly healthcare services face problems of poor service quality, difficulty in eliminating hidden quality risks, and inadequate government supervision, primarily due to information asymmetry and insufficient supervision among providers, users, and regulatory bodies. The study addresses two key questions: How does information asymmetry influence private sector strategies in elderly healthcare public-private partnership (PPP), and what regulatory models can overcome the potential shortcomings? The study examines the influence of information asymmetry, particularly on "experience" and "credence," crucial for governance and service quality in elderly healthcare PPPs in China. By developing the novel methodology of evolutionary game theory and employing MATLAB simulations, this study analyzes private sector behavior under two distinct regulatory models. The research findings reveal a significant disparity, under the traditional "single" model; private sectors often prioritize low-quality services driven by self-interest or inadequate penalties, while the collaborative model incentivizes them to deliver higher-quality services influenced by factors such as public participation, reputational incentives, and penalties. Therefore, the paper proposed a multifaceted regulatory model based on strengthening third-party evaluation mechanisms, encouraging public participation, and refining reward and penalty systems. This proposed model will not only significantly contribute to regulatory effectiveness and quality services within elderly healthcare PPP projects, but will also serve as a reference point for government decision-makers responsible for quality services within PPP projects.

摘要

中国老年医疗服务面临服务质量差、难以消除潜在质量风险以及政府监管不足等问题,主要原因是提供者、使用者和监管机构之间存在信息不对称以及监管不力。该研究探讨了两个关键问题:信息不对称如何影响老年医疗公私合营(PPP)中私营部门的策略,以及哪些监管模式可以克服潜在的缺点?该研究考察了信息不对称的影响,特别是对“经验”和“信任”的影响,这对中国老年医疗PPP中的治理和服务质量至关重要。通过开发进化博弈论的新方法并采用MATLAB模拟,本研究分析了两种不同监管模式下的私营部门行为。研究结果显示出显著差异,在传统的“单一”模式下,私营部门往往出于自身利益或处罚不足而优先选择低质量服务,而合作模式则促使它们在公众参与、声誉激励和处罚等因素的影响下提供更高质量的服务。因此,本文提出了一种基于加强第三方评估机制、鼓励公众参与和完善奖惩制度的多方面监管模式。这一提出的模式不仅将显著提高老年医疗PPP项目中的监管有效性和服务质量,还将为负责PPP项目优质服务的政府决策者提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/86f4e922ac08/12913_2025_12321_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/bab8dcd5847f/12913_2025_12321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/7384919ba84a/12913_2025_12321_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/8f903e998a39/12913_2025_12321_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/8b0197a43a8e/12913_2025_12321_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/537652ca1eb3/12913_2025_12321_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/6be1588e9be1/12913_2025_12321_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/6e7862aeb360/12913_2025_12321_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/5361d81641d7/12913_2025_12321_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/ead3183ef306/12913_2025_12321_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/f76e4120508b/12913_2025_12321_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/9e563a918538/12913_2025_12321_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/554787aecebb/12913_2025_12321_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/86f4e922ac08/12913_2025_12321_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/bab8dcd5847f/12913_2025_12321_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/7384919ba84a/12913_2025_12321_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/8f903e998a39/12913_2025_12321_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/8b0197a43a8e/12913_2025_12321_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/537652ca1eb3/12913_2025_12321_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/6be1588e9be1/12913_2025_12321_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/6e7862aeb360/12913_2025_12321_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/5361d81641d7/12913_2025_12321_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/ead3183ef306/12913_2025_12321_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/f76e4120508b/12913_2025_12321_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/9e563a918538/12913_2025_12321_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/554787aecebb/12913_2025_12321_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca91/11783943/86f4e922ac08/12913_2025_12321_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolutionary game model for the behavior of private sectors in elderly healthcare public-private partnership under the condition of information asymmetry.信息不对称条件下老年医疗公私合作中私营部门行为的演化博弈模型
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12321-8.
2
The Evolution of Opportunistic Behavior of Participating Subjects during the Operation Period of PPP Projects.公私合营(PPP)项目运营期内参与主体机会主义行为的演变
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 14;2022:8450529. doi: 10.1155/2022/8450529. eCollection 2022.
3
Evolutionary game analysis of rural public-private partnership older adult care project in the context of population aging in China.中国人口老龄化背景下农村公私合作伙伴关系养老项目的演化博弈分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;11:1110082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110082. eCollection 2023.
4
An evolutionary game analysis of supervision behavior in public-private partnership projects: Insights from prospect theory and mental accounting.公私合营项目中监管行为的演化博弈分析:来自前景理论和心理账户的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1023945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023945. eCollection 2022.
5
An evolutionary game for the behavior of third-party evaluators in pension public-private partnership incorporating public participation.纳入公众参与的养老金公私合营中第三方评估者行为的演化博弈
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47369-1.
6
Evolutionary game analysis of opportunistic behavior of Sponge City PPP projects: a perceived value perspective.海绵城市 PPP 项目机会主义行为的演化博弈分析:感知价值视角
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12830-0.
7
Optimal Subsidy Support for the Provision of Elderly Care Services in China Based on the Evolutionary Game Analysis.基于演化博弈分析的中国养老服务提供最优补贴支持
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;19(5):2800. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052800.
8
Government subsidy and benefit distribution mechanisms for transportation PPP projects: An evolutionary game perspective.交通 PPP 项目的政府补贴和利益分配机制:基于演化博弈的视角。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:120981. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120981. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
9
Impact of the collaboration mechanism of PPP projects based on consumer participation: A system dynamics model of tripartite evolutionary game.基于消费者参与的 PPP 项目合作机制的影响:三方进化博弈的系统动力学模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0256304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256304. eCollection 2021.
10
Study on the evolutionary game of the three parties in the combined medical and health-care PPP project.三方参与的医养结合 PPP 项目演化博弈研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 26;11:1072354. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1072354. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on collaborative governance of excessive medical care based on three-way evolutionary game and simulation.基于三方演化博弈与仿真的过度医疗协同治理研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 17;13:1593398. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1593398. eCollection 2025.
2
China's coordinated tripartite medical reform: strategic balancing of interests among pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and health insurance.中国的三方协同医疗改革:药品、医疗服务和医疗保险之间利益的战略平衡。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 11;13:1591358. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1591358. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathways to Improve Provision of Home and Community-Based Services-A Configurational Approach Based on a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis From China.改善家庭和社区服务提供途径——基于中国模糊集定性比较分析的组态方法。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Jan;43(1):89-100. doi: 10.1177/07334648231197029. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
2
An evolutionary game for the behavior of third-party evaluators in pension public-private partnership incorporating public participation.纳入公众参与的养老金公私合营中第三方评估者行为的演化博弈
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 23;13(1):20543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47369-1.
3
Research on the game of manufacturing capacity sharing based on prospect theory.
基于前景理论的制造能力共享博弈研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 23;13(1):18093. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45189-x.
4
Unveiling the Evolution of Eldercare Facilities in Rural China: Tracing the Trajectory from Eldercare Support Pattern and Service to Facilities for the Aging Population.揭示中国农村养老设施的演变:追溯从养老支持模式、服务到老年人口设施的发展轨迹。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;11(18):2474. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182474.
5
Evolutionary game analysis of rural public-private partnership older adult care project in the context of population aging in China.中国人口老龄化背景下农村公私合作伙伴关系养老项目的演化博弈分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;11:1110082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110082. eCollection 2023.
6
Evaluation of the suitability of elderly care in prefecture-level cities in China based on GIS.基于地理信息系统(GIS)对中国地级市老年护理适宜性的评估
Heliyon. 2023 May 26;9(6):e16539. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16539. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Trust and Distrust in Pension Providers in Times of Decline and Reform: Analysis of Survey Data 2004-2021.衰退与改革时期养老金提供者中的信任与不信任:2004 - 2021年调查数据分析
Economist (Leiden). 2022;170(4):401-433. doi: 10.1007/s10645-022-09411-x. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
The Evolution of Opportunistic Behavior of Participating Subjects during the Operation Period of PPP Projects.公私合营(PPP)项目运营期内参与主体机会主义行为的演变
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 14;2022:8450529. doi: 10.1155/2022/8450529. eCollection 2022.
9
Quality of life of older people in nursing homes in China-evaluation and application of the Chinese version of the life satisfaction questionnaire.中国养老院老年人的生活质量-生活满意度问卷中文版的评估与应用。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 15;22(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03040-4.
10
Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects.中国老年人长期护理体系:政策现状、挑战与未来展望。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 24;396(10259):1362-1372. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32136-X.