• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公私合营项目中监管行为的演化博弈分析:来自前景理论和心理账户的见解

An evolutionary game analysis of supervision behavior in public-private partnership projects: Insights from prospect theory and mental accounting.

作者信息

Cheng Xiaotong, Cheng Min

机构信息

Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1023945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023945. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023945
PMID:36710850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9874104/
Abstract

Effective supervision is one of the important ways to ensure the smooth implementation of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects. To understand the characteristics of the decision-making behavior of the public and private sectors in the supervision of PPP projects and the influencing mechanisms of some factors, we combine prospect theory and mental accounting theory into the evolutionary game analysis. First, we use prospect theory to reflect the behavioral characteristics of game players when making decisions and classify the value function into a valence account and a cost account according to the mental accounting theory. Accordingly, we construct a payoff matrix based on prospect theory and mental accounting theory, and the system's equilibrium state is analyzed. Then, based on numerical simulations, the influence of different parameters on the behavior of the public and private sectors is analyzed, and management suggestions for practical reference are put forward based on the simulation results. The results show that the greater the perceived cost of active behavior for the public and private sectors, the less likely they will take active behavior. Secondly, there is insufficient incentive for the private sector to fulfill contracts when the penalties for its opportunistic behavior are minor. Thirdly, increasing the cost reference points and decreasing the valence reference points will promote the public and private sectors to adopt active behavior. Fourth, the public sector and the private sector are more inclined to take active behavior when they need to bear more significant risk losses. This study provides new ideas for the analysis of the game players' decision-making behaviors in the supervision of PPP projects and delivers a decision-making reference for reasonable supervision.

摘要

有效监管是确保公私合营(PPP)项目顺利实施的重要途径之一。为了解公私部门在PPP项目监管中的决策行为特征以及一些因素的影响机制,我们将前景理论和心理账户理论纳入演化博弈分析。首先,我们运用前景理论来反映博弈参与者在决策时的行为特征,并根据心理账户理论将价值函数分为收益账户和成本账户。据此,我们构建了基于前景理论和心理账户理论的收益矩阵,并分析了系统的均衡状态。然后,基于数值模拟,分析了不同参数对公私部门行为的影响,并根据模拟结果提出了可供实际参考的管理建议。结果表明,公私部门主动行为的感知成本越高,其采取主动行为的可能性就越小。其次,当私营部门机会主义行为的惩罚较轻时,其履行合同的激励不足。第三,提高成本参考点和降低收益参考点将促使公私部门采取主动行为。第四,当公私部门需要承担更重大的风险损失时,它们更倾向于采取主动行为。本研究为分析PPP项目监管中博弈参与者的决策行为提供了新思路,并为合理监管提供了决策参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/8a70c6953029/fpsyg-13-1023945-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/79f5873f2a47/fpsyg-13-1023945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/40138fbabe2d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/a4d89833279d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/b94a26479a7d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/beeec8919b39/fpsyg-13-1023945-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/be508f16a15a/fpsyg-13-1023945-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/8a70c6953029/fpsyg-13-1023945-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/79f5873f2a47/fpsyg-13-1023945-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/40138fbabe2d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/a4d89833279d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/b94a26479a7d/fpsyg-13-1023945-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/beeec8919b39/fpsyg-13-1023945-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/be508f16a15a/fpsyg-13-1023945-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c100/9874104/8a70c6953029/fpsyg-13-1023945-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
An evolutionary game analysis of supervision behavior in public-private partnership projects: Insights from prospect theory and mental accounting.公私合营项目中监管行为的演化博弈分析:来自前景理论和心理账户的见解
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:1023945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1023945. eCollection 2022.
2
Evolutionary game analysis of opportunistic behavior of Sponge City PPP projects: a perceived value perspective.海绵城市 PPP 项目机会主义行为的演化博弈分析:感知价值视角
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12830-0.
3
The Evolution of Opportunistic Behavior of Participating Subjects during the Operation Period of PPP Projects.公私合营(PPP)项目运营期内参与主体机会主义行为的演变
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 14;2022:8450529. doi: 10.1155/2022/8450529. eCollection 2022.
4
Government subsidy and benefit distribution mechanisms for transportation PPP projects: An evolutionary game perspective.交通 PPP 项目的政府补贴和利益分配机制:基于演化博弈的视角。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:120981. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120981. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
5
Optimal operation mode selection of sponge city PPP projects using IFSS-prospect theory and VIKOR approach: a case study in China.基于 IFSS-前景理论和 VIKOR 方法的海绵城市 PPP 项目最优运营模式选择:中国的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jun;30(26):68206-68226. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26854-0. Epub 2023 Apr 29.
6
Relationship Orientation, Justice Perception, and Opportunistic Behavior in PPP Projects: An Empirical Study From China.公私合营项目中的关系导向、公平感知与机会主义行为:来自中国的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:635447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635447. eCollection 2021.
7
Game analysis on PPP model operation of abandoned mines ecological restoration under the innovation of central government's reward and punishment system in China.中国中央政府奖惩制度创新下废弃矿山生态恢复 PPP 模式运作的博弈分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0304368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304368. eCollection 2024.
8
Developing a Dynamic Supervision Mechanism to Improve Construction Safety Investment Supervision Efficiency in China: Theoretical Simulation of Evolutionary Game Process.建立动态监管机制以提高中国建设安全投资监管效率:演化博弈过程的理论模拟。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3594. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073594.
9
Evolutionary game analysis of multi-agent cooperation strategy analysis in agricultural water conservancy PPP project under digitization background.数字化背景下农业水利PPP项目多主体合作策略的演化博弈分析
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 2;14(1):22915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74065-5.
10
Evolutionary game analysis of rural public-private partnership older adult care project in the context of population aging in China.中国人口老龄化背景下农村公私合作伙伴关系养老项目的演化博弈分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;11:1110082. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1110082. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolution of coopetition between real estate enterprises and urban investment construction companies under an agent construction system.代建制度下房地产企业与城市投资建设公司竞合关系的演变
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92853-5.
2
Steady-state analysis of social responsibility strategy of coal power enterprises from the perspective of game theory.基于博弈论视角的煤电企业社会责任战略稳态分析
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 2;10(1):e23124. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23124. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Improving the greenness of enterprise supply chains by designing government subsidy mechanisms: based on prospect theory and evolutionary games.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder governance and the CSR of banks: An analysis of an internal governance mechanism based on game theory.利益相关者治理与银行的企业社会责任:基于博弈论的内部治理机制分析
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 25;13:918290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.918290. eCollection 2022.
2
Evolutionary Game Analysis of Construction Workers' Unsafe Behaviors Based on Incentive and Punishment Mechanisms.基于激励与惩罚机制的建筑工人不安全行为进化博弈分析
Front Psychol. 2022 May 24;13:907382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907382. eCollection 2022.
3
Evolutionary game analysis of opportunistic behavior of Sponge City PPP projects: a perceived value perspective.
基于前景理论和演化博弈设计政府补贴机制以提高企业供应链绿色度
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 23;14:1283794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1283794. eCollection 2023.
海绵城市 PPP 项目机会主义行为的演化博弈分析:感知价值视角
Sci Rep. 2022 May 25;12(1):8798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12830-0.
4
Factors Influencing Procurement Officers' Preference for PPP Procurement Model: An Empirical Analysis of China.影响采购官员对公私合营采购模式偏好的因素:基于中国的实证分析
Front Psychol. 2022 May 4;13:832617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832617. eCollection 2022.
5
Relationship Orientation, Justice Perception, and Opportunistic Behavior in PPP Projects: An Empirical Study From China.公私合营项目中的关系导向、公平感知与机会主义行为:来自中国的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 1;12:635447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635447. eCollection 2021.
6
Multi-agent evolutionary game in the recycling utilization of construction waste.多主体演化博弈在建筑废弃物回收利用中的应用。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 10;738:139826. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139826. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
7
Evolution Model of Health Food Safety Risk Based on Prospect Theory.基于前景理论的食品安全风险演化模型。
J Healthc Eng. 2018 Oct 23;2018:8769563. doi: 10.1155/2018/8769563. eCollection 2018.
8
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.《不确定性下的判断:启发式与偏差》
Science. 1974 Sep 27;185(4157):1124-31. doi: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.