• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在新冠疫情期间,英国医疗保健专业人员对实施《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》的看法与经历。

Perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals of implementing the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act in England during the Covid-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Al-Haboubi Mustafa, McLaughlin Leah, Williams Lorraine, Noyes Jane, O'Neill Stephen, Boadu Paul, Bostock Jennifer, Mays Nicholas

机构信息

Policy Innovation and Evaluation Research Unit, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12224-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-12224-8
PMID:39891187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11786446/
Abstract

CONTEXT

In May 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, England implemented a 'soft' opt-out system of consent to deceased organ donation. As part of a wider evaluation, this analysis focused on the perceptions of health care professionals, specifically their experiences of implementation.

METHODS

Mixed-methods study informed by Normalisation Process Theory, based on two national surveys of health care professionals and interviews, observations and document analysis, across two case study sites. Routine NHS Blood and Transplant's audit data provided context.

FINDINGS

70 interviews with 59 staff and 244 first and 738 second surveys. COVID-19 affected every aspect of implementation. Although supportive in principle, many staff were unconvinced that legislative changes alone would increase consent rates. Many staff were redeployed or left their jobs. As a result, staff were not able to work collectively as intended for implementation. Staff received routine donor audit data suggesting the law was yet to make a difference to consent rates, reducing their enthusiasm and commitment.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation could have been more impactful if delayed. The National Health Service needs to reprioritise organ donation and relaunch the implementation plan in the post-pandemic period, though it is unlikely the changes will bring about a significant increase in consent rates.

摘要

背景

2020年5月新冠疫情期间,英国实施了死者器官捐赠的“软性”退出同意系统。作为更广泛评估的一部分,本分析聚焦于医疗保健专业人员的看法,特别是他们的实施经验。

方法

基于常态化过程理论的混合方法研究,以对医疗保健专业人员的两项全国性调查以及在两个案例研究地点进行的访谈、观察和文件分析为基础。英国国家医疗服务体系血液与移植部门的常规审计数据提供了背景信息。

研究结果

对59名工作人员进行了70次访谈,以及244份首次调查和738份二次调查。新冠疫情影响了实施的各个方面。尽管原则上表示支持,但许多工作人员并不相信仅靠立法变革就能提高同意率。许多工作人员被重新调配或离职。因此,工作人员无法按计划集体开展实施工作。工作人员收到的常规捐赠者审计数据表明,法律尚未对同意率产生影响,这降低了他们的积极性和投入度。

结论

如果推迟实施,可能会产生更大影响。英国国家医疗服务体系需要重新确定器官捐赠的优先次序,并在疫情后重新启动实施计划,不过这些变革不太可能使同意率大幅提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/fb422abb1433/12913_2025_12224_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/116215679a33/12913_2025_12224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/eba8336520ea/12913_2025_12224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/98aba906af17/12913_2025_12224_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/1fdd94f0b59e/12913_2025_12224_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/fb422abb1433/12913_2025_12224_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/116215679a33/12913_2025_12224_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/eba8336520ea/12913_2025_12224_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/98aba906af17/12913_2025_12224_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/1fdd94f0b59e/12913_2025_12224_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59c0/11786446/fb422abb1433/12913_2025_12224_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals of implementing the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act in England during the Covid-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,英国医疗保健专业人员对实施《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》的看法与经历。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 31;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12224-8.
2
Ethical, Psychological and Social Un/certainties in the Face of Deemed Consent for Organ Donation in England.面对英国推定同意器官捐赠中的伦理、心理和社会不确定性。
Health Care Anal. 2024 Dec;32(4):272-289. doi: 10.1007/s10728-024-00492-0. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Trends in organ donation in England, Scotland and Wales in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and 'opt-out' legislation.在 COVID-19 大流行和“选择退出”立法背景下,英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的器官捐赠趋势。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0306541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306541. eCollection 2024.
4
Subgroup differences in public attitudes, preferences and self-reported behaviour related to deceased organ donation before and after the introduction of the 'soft' opt-out consent system in England: mixed-methods study.在英格兰引入“软性”默认同意制度前后,与已故器官捐赠相关的公众态度、偏好和自我报告行为的亚组差异:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11821-3.
5
Family attitudes, actions, decisions and experiences following implementation of deemed consent and the Human Transplantation (Wales) Act 2013: mixed-method study protocol.2013年《推定同意与人体移植(威尔士)法案》实施后家庭的态度、行动、决策及经历:混合方法研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 12;7(10):e017287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017287.
6
Potential donor family behaviours, experiences and decisions following implementation of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 in England: A qualitative study.英国2019年《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》实施后潜在捐赠者家属的行为、经历及决策:一项定性研究
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Feb;86:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103816. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
7
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
8
The Resilience Hub approach for addressing mental health of health and social care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods evaluation.应对 COVID-19 大流行期间卫生和社会保健工作者心理健康问题的韧性中心方法:一项混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(29):1-164. doi: 10.3310/HGQR5133.
9
Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales.威尔士专科护士实施软性默认器官捐献系统的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4266-z.
10
"I am in favour of organ donation, but I feel you should opt-in"-qualitative analysis of the #options 2020 survey free-text responses from NHS staff toward opt-out organ donation legislation in England.我支持器官捐赠,但我觉得你应该选择加入”——对英格兰国民保健制度工作人员在#选项 2020 调查中对选择退出器官捐赠立法的免费文本回复的定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 20;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01048-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Potential donor family behaviours, experiences and decisions following implementation of the Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 in England: A qualitative study.英国2019年《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》实施后潜在捐赠者家属的行为、经历及决策:一项定性研究
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Feb;86:103816. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103816. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Family and emergency physicians' knowledge and attitudes toward organ donation and deemed consent: Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act in Nova Scotia.家庭医生和急诊医生对器官捐献和推定同意的知识和态度:新斯科舍省的人体器官和组织捐献法案。
Can Fam Physician. 2024 Jan;70(1):e20-e27. doi: 10.46747/cfp.7001e20.
3
Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study.
选择加入与选择退出政策对已故器官捐献率的影响差异:一项混合概念和实证研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 8;12(9):e057107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107.
4
An ethicist's view on the Archie Battersbee case: a bad situation made worse.一位伦理学家对阿奇·巴特尔斯比案的看法:糟糕的情况变得更糟。
BMJ. 2022 Aug 9;378:o1980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1980.
5
Seeking consent for organ donation: Process evaluation of implementing a new Specialist Requester nursing role.器官捐献同意书获取:实施新的专科请求护士角色的过程评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Feb;77(2):845-868. doi: 10.1111/jan.14601. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
6
The effect on consent rates for deceased organ donation in Wales after the introduction of an opt-out system.在引入默认捐献制度后,威尔士对已故器官捐献同意率的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Sep;75(9):1146-1152. doi: 10.1111/anae.15055. Epub 2020 May 5.
7
Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales.威尔士专科护士实施软性默认器官捐献系统的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4266-z.
8
Short-term impact of introducing a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales: before and after study.威尔士引入软性自愿器官捐献制度的短期影响:前后研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 3;9(4):e025159. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025159.
9
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence.收敛性和序列性综合设计:对定性和定量证据进行系统评价的实施与报告的影响
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0454-2.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.