Ortega Natalia, Mueller Nick J, Dehghan Abbas, de Crom Tosca O E, von Gunten Armin, Preisig Martin, Marques-Vidal Pedro, Vinceti Marco, Voortman Trudy, Rodondi Nicolas, Chocano-Bedoya Patricia O
Institute for Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Population Health Laboratory (#PopHealthLab), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Nutr J. 2025 Jan 31;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01083-y.
Meta-analyses of observational studies on the effect of dairy on cognitive function have yielded inconclusive results, potentially due to unmeasured confounding. To avoid the no-unmeasured confounding assumption, we used lactase persistence genetic variant as an instrumental variable, for which the CC genotype is associated with lower lactase production and, consequently, lower dairy consumption. We used it to assess the effect of long-term consumption of total and non-fermented dairy on cognitive function.
We included 43,836 individuals over 55 years old with genotyping, dietary data, and cognitive function measurements from three population-based studies: CoLaus|PsyCoLaus (Switzerland), the Rotterdam Study (the Netherlands) and the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA - Canada). We performed a one-sample Mendelian randomization using two-stage least-squares regression. First, we estimated total and non-fermented dairy consumption by T-allele frequency. Second, we used the estimated dairy consumption in linear regression models on general cognition, assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Mental Alternation Test, executive function, verbal fluency, verbal learning, and memory.
Per T-allele, total dairy intake and non-fermented was 24.8 and 15.3 g/day higher in PsyCoLaus, 57.9 and 49.8 g/day in the Rotterdam Study, and 0.31 and 0.29 times/day in CLSA, respectively. We found no association between the genetically predicted difference and the MMSE in PsyCoLaus and the Rotterdam Study. However, lactase persistent individuals scored 3.4 (95% CI 2.1- 4.7) and 3.5 (95% CI 2.3-4.7) points more in the Mental Alternation Test for total and fermented dairy, respectively, in CLSA. Similarly, lactase persistent participants in CLSA had higher verbal fluency, verbal learning and executive function, but no differences were found in the other cohorts. Such inconsistencies might stem from different FFQs across cohorts and consumption ranges. Nonetheless, the generally small magnitude of effect sizes may suggest that there is no real effect between total or non-fermented dairy intake and cognitive function.
The evidence for a causal effect of dairy consumption on general cognitive function is weak, consistent with previous results from classic analysis from observational studies. Interventions targeting dairy are unlikely to have a relevant effect on cognitive function.
关于乳制品对认知功能影响的观察性研究的荟萃分析结果尚无定论,这可能是由于存在未测量的混杂因素。为避免未测量混杂因素的假设,我们使用乳糖酶持久性基因变异作为工具变量,CC基因型与较低的乳糖酶产生相关,进而与较低的乳制品摄入量相关。我们用它来评估长期食用全脂和非发酵乳制品对认知功能的影响。
我们纳入了来自三项基于人群的研究(瑞士的CoLaus|PsyCoLaus、荷兰的鹿特丹研究和加拿大的加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA))的43836名55岁以上的个体,这些个体有基因分型、饮食数据和认知功能测量结果。我们使用两阶段最小二乘法回归进行单样本孟德尔随机化。首先,我们通过T等位基因频率估计全脂和非发酵乳制品的消费量。其次,我们将估计的乳制品消费量用于线性回归模型,以评估一般认知功能(通过简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和精神交替测试评估)、执行功能、语言流畅性、语言学习和记忆。
在PsyCoLaus研究中,每一个T等位基因,全脂乳制品摄入量和非发酵乳制品摄入量分别高出24.8克/天和15.3克/天;在鹿特丹研究中,分别高出57.9克/天和49.8克/天;在CLSA研究中,分别高出0.31次/天和0.29次/天。我们发现在PsyCoLaus研究和鹿特丹研究中,基因预测差异与MMSE之间没有关联。然而,在CLSA研究中,乳糖酶持久性个体在全脂和发酵乳制品的精神交替测试中分别多得3.4分(95%置信区间2.1 - 4.7)和3.5分(95%置信区间2.3 - 4.7)。同样,CLSA研究中乳糖酶持久性参与者的语言流畅性、语言学习和执行功能更高,但在其他队列中未发现差异。这种不一致可能源于不同队列中不同的食物频率问卷和消费范围。尽管如此,效应大小普遍较小可能表明全脂或非发酵乳制品摄入量与认知功能之间没有实际影响。
乳制品消费对一般认知功能有因果效应的证据薄弱,这与观察性研究的经典分析先前结果一致。针对乳制品的干预措施不太可能对认知功能产生相关影响。