Mathews Shifali, Smith Genee, Madrigano Jaime
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2025 Feb 1;12(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s40572-025-00475-w.
Understanding hurricane vulnerability is crucial for targeting and identifying climate adaptation measures. However, vulnerability assessments often focus on proximal factors, which may obscure underlying drivers of health inequities. We sought to describe the literature characterizing hurricane vulnerability in the U.S., from 2000 to 2022. We abstracted the approaches and factors in each hurricane vulnerability assessment study, and developed a conceptual framework to guide data collection on structural determinants of climate vulnerability.
The review included a total of 121 studies. The majority pre-specified vulnerable populations, while 40% empirically derived vulnerability. Downstream factors pertaining to demographics, spatial analysis, and health status were most commonly used to assess vulnerability to hurricanes. Only five studies reported structural vulnerabilities, including racism, governance, institutions, and infrastructure deficiencies, which form the basis of our conceptual framework. Most hurricane vulnerability studies do not consider upstream factors of health inequities. We developed a conceptual framework and provided example data measures for structural determinants to incorporate into climate and health research, facilitating the development of more effective interventions to address root causes.
了解飓风脆弱性对于确定和识别气候适应措施至关重要。然而,脆弱性评估往往侧重于近端因素,这可能会掩盖健康不平等的潜在驱动因素。我们试图描述2000年至2022年期间美国有关飓风脆弱性的文献。我们提取了每项飓风脆弱性评估研究中的方法和因素,并制定了一个概念框架,以指导关于气候脆弱性结构决定因素的数据收集。
该综述共纳入121项研究。大多数研究预先指定了脆弱人群,而40%的研究通过实证得出脆弱性。与人口统计学、空间分析和健康状况相关的下游因素最常用于评估飓风脆弱性。只有五项研究报告了结构脆弱性,包括种族主义、治理、机构和基础设施缺陷,这些构成了我们概念框架的基础。大多数飓风脆弱性研究没有考虑健康不平等的上游因素。我们制定了一个概念框架,并提供了结构决定因素的示例数据指标,以便纳入气候与健康研究,促进制定更有效的干预措施来解决根本原因。