Suppr超能文献

在一项全州范围的避孕服务可及性倡议中社会剥夺指数与避孕护理的关联

The association of social deprivation index and contraception care in a statewide contraceptive access initiative.

作者信息

Bernard Caitlin, Edmonds Brownsyne Tucker, Kean Kelly, Evans Rebecca, Bhamidipalli Surya S, Tong Yan, Brown Steven A, Fernandez Maria, Wendholt Kathleen, Peipert Jeffrey F, Wilkinson Tracey A

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

Indiana University School of Nursing, Division of Community and Health Systems, Indianapolis, IN, United States.

出版信息

Contraception. 2025 May;145:110833. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2025.110833. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association of social deprivation index (SDI) and contraception care in a statewide contraceptive access initiative (PATH4YOU) in Indiana.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional analysis was performed to examine associations of participant's chosen appointment type and contraceptive method with age and SDI.

RESULTS

Of the 1201 participants, 45.2% chose a short-acting contraception, 76.9% received in-person care. Those within the highest SDI quartile (greatest social deprivation) chose in-person care (93.1% vs. 63.4%) and long-acting contraception (62.8% vs. 35.6%) when compared to participants within the lowest quartile (p < 0.01). This was confirmed by multivariable analysis, which showed that as SDI quartiles increased, OR for in-person care and long-acting contraception increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant chosen type of appointment and contraceptive method were associated with levels of social deprivation.

IMPLICATIONS

Analysis of appointment type and contraceptive method within a statewide contraceptive initiative in Indiana (PATH4YOU) was done and showed differences based on social deprivation quartiles. Those living in geographic areas of greatest social deprivation chose in-person care (vs. telehealth) and long-acting contraception.

摘要

目的

在印第安纳州一项全州范围的避孕服务获取倡议(PATH4YOU)中,研究社会剥夺指数(SDI)与避孕护理之间的关联。

研究设计

进行横断面分析,以研究参与者选择的预约类型和避孕方法与年龄及SDI之间的关联。

结果

在1201名参与者中,45.2%选择了短效避孕方法,76.9%接受了面对面护理。与最低四分位数组的参与者相比,最高SDI四分位数组(社会剥夺程度最高)的参与者选择面对面护理的比例更高(93.1%对63.4%),选择长效避孕方法的比例也更高(62.8%对35.6%)(p<0.01)。多变量分析证实了这一点,结果显示随着SDI四分位数的增加,选择面对面护理和长效避孕方法的比值比也增加。

结论

参与者选择的预约类型和避孕方法与社会剥夺水平相关。

意义

对印第安纳州一项全州范围的避孕倡议(PATH4YOU)中的预约类型和避孕方法进行了分析,结果显示不同社会剥夺四分位数组之间存在差异。生活在社会剥夺程度最高地理区域的人选择面对面护理(而非远程医疗)和长效避孕方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验