Behl Ritika, Nemane Vivek, Gurpur Shashikala
Alliance University, Bangalore, India
Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India.
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 2;15(1):e093027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093027.
To provide insights into the perspectives of clinical specialists (CSs) regarding the efficacy of existing legal interventions (health laws, policies, guidelines, etc) in addressing and managing perinatal depression (PND) in women in India, in the background of the existing policy gap.
After adopting the consultative participatory approach, a qualitative study involving online, semi-structured, in-depth interviews was conducted. Purposive, and snowball sampling techniques were used to identify and invite the participants. Thematic content analysis was performed. The findings were reported in alignment with the Standards of Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.
India.
12 out of 38 invited CSs participated in the study. All invited participants either had a background in perinatal psychiatry or were experienced in working with the perinatal population and had undertaken evidence-based research regarding perinatal mental health (PMH), in the Indian setting.
Five themes emerged from the collected data including (1) the epidemiology of PND in the Indian context, (2) the management of PND in India and the efficacy of the existing legal frameworks, (3) the need for legal interventions for addressing and managing PND in India, (4) role of legislative instruments, globally, in managing maternal PND and (5) advocacy for PMH by lawyers, and advocates in India.
The existing policy gap is associated with the violation of women's rights. The Mental Health Care Act (MHCA), 2017 should be amended to recognise perinatal women as a vulnerable group and to prioritise their PMH needs. A nationwide policy should be introduced to ensure integrated PMH services.
在现有政策空白的背景下,深入了解临床专家(CSs)对印度现行法律干预措施(卫生法律、政策、指南等)在解决和管理围产期抑郁症(PND)方面的疗效的看法。
采用协商参与式方法,开展了一项涉及在线半结构化深度访谈的定性研究。采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样技术来识别和邀请参与者。进行了主题内容分析。研究结果按照定性研究报告标准清单进行报告。
印度。
38名受邀临床专家中有12名参与了研究。所有受邀参与者要么具有围产期精神病学背景,要么在围产期人群工作方面经验丰富,并在印度环境下开展了关于围产期心理健康(PMH)的循证研究。
从收集的数据中出现了五个主题,包括(1)印度背景下围产期抑郁症的流行病学,(2)印度围产期抑郁症的管理以及现有法律框架的疗效,(3)印度解决和管理围产期抑郁症所需的法律干预措施,(4)全球范围内立法工具在管理孕产妇围产期抑郁症中的作用,以及(5)印度律师和倡导者对围产期心理健康的倡导。
现有的政策空白与侵犯妇女权利有关。应修订2017年《精神卫生保健法》(MHCA),将围产期妇女视为弱势群体,并优先满足她们的围产期心理健康需求。应出台一项全国性政策,以确保提供综合围产期心理健康服务。