• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦围产期心理健康的认知与态度:定性数据的系统综述

Perceptions and attitudes around perinatal mental health in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: a systematic review of qualitative data.

作者信息

Insan Nafisa, Weke Anthony, Rankin Judith, Forrest Simon

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Department of Sociology, Durham University, Durham, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04642-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-022-04642-x
PMID:35387619
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8988352/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perinatal mental health (PMH) is a worldwide public health issue crossing cultural boundaries. However, the prevalence of PMH conditions vary considerably. These disparities stem in part from poor understanding and stigma surrounding PMH which hinder pregnant women from seeking mental health care and may exacerbate their conditions. Bangladesh, India and Pakistan are South Asian countries with a higher burden of PMH conditions than in the Global North-West and very different social and cultural norms around gender and mental health. The aim of this systematic review (PROSPERO Ref: CRD42020167903) was to identify, synthesise and appraise the available literature on perceptions and attitudes of perinatal (pregnant and postpartum) women, their families and healthcare providers surrounding PMH in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan.

METHODS

Five electronic databases, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of science, and grey literature were searched using predefined search terms. Qualitative or quantitative articles with a qualitative component reporting perceptions and attitudes surrounding PMH in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan were eligible for inclusion, if published in English between January 2000 and January 2021. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Research Checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for cross-sectional studies were used to assess study quality. Findings were synthesised using thematic synthesis, as described by Thomas and Harden 2008.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included. Five overarching themes comprising 17 sub-categories were identified. These descriptive themes were: perceived causes of PMH, perceived symptoms of PMH, perceptions of motherhood, accessing PMH care and emotional sharing and coping strategies. Sociocultural expectations underpin many of the themes identified in this review including the importance of familial and societal causes of PMH, emphasis on physical symptoms, sacredness of motherhood, lack of awareness, stigma, shame, limited resources allocated for mental health and lack of emotional sharing.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a complex range of perceptions and attitudes around PMH which influence women's experiences and access to PMH care. These findings will inform policy and practice through targeted interventions to tackle stigmatising attitudes and increasing education and training for healthcare providers.

摘要

背景

围产期心理健康(PMH)是一个跨越文化界限的全球性公共卫生问题。然而,PMH状况的患病率差异很大。这些差异部分源于对PMH的理解不足和污名化,这阻碍了孕妇寻求心理健康护理,并可能加剧她们的病情。孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦是南亚国家,与全球西北部相比,PMH状况的负担更重,并且在性别和心理健康方面有着截然不同的社会和文化规范。本系统评价(PROSPERO编号:CRD42020167903)的目的是识别、综合和评估关于孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦围产期(怀孕和产后)妇女、其家人及医疗保健提供者对PMH的看法和态度的现有文献。

方法

使用预定义的检索词在五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of science)以及灰色文献中进行检索。如果在2000年1月至2021年1月期间以英文发表,报告孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦围产期妇女、其家人及医疗保健提供者对PMH的看法和态度的定性或定量文章(包含定性部分)符合纳入标准。使用批判性评估技能计划定性研究清单和横断面研究的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表来评估研究质量。按照Thomas和Harden 2008年所述,采用主题综合法对研究结果进行综合分析。

结果

纳入了八项研究。确定了五个总体主题,包含17个子类别。这些描述性主题为:PMH的感知原因、PMH的感知症状、对母亲身份的看法、获得PMH护理以及情感分享和应对策略。社会文化期望是本评价中确定的许多主题的基础,包括PMH的家庭和社会原因的重要性、对身体症状的强调、母亲身份的神圣性、意识缺乏、污名化、羞耻感、分配给心理健康的资源有限以及情感分享的缺乏。

结论

围绕PMH存在一系列复杂的看法和态度,这些影响着妇女的经历以及获得PMH护理的机会。这些研究结果将通过针对性干预措施来消除污名化态度,并增加对医疗保健提供者的教育和培训,从而为政策和实践提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/8988352/614d461ca16c/12884_2022_4642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/8988352/614d461ca16c/12884_2022_4642_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de0c/8988352/614d461ca16c/12884_2022_4642_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions and attitudes around perinatal mental health in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan: a systematic review of qualitative data.孟加拉国、印度和巴基斯坦围产期心理健康的认知与态度:定性数据的系统综述
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04642-x.
2
Perceptions of barriers to accessing perinatal mental health care in midwifery: A scoping review.助产领域中获得围产期心理健康护理的障碍认知:一项范围综述。
Midwifery. 2019 Mar;70:106-118. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.11.011. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Midwives' perceptions and experiences of caring for women who experience perinatal mental health problems: An integrative review.助产士对照顾有围产期心理健康问题女性的认知与经历:一项综合综述。
Midwifery. 2017 Feb;45:56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
5
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
6
Barriers to accessing mental health services for women with perinatal mental illness: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in the UK.英国围产期精神疾病女性获得心理健康服务的障碍:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024803.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Conceptual framework on barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care and treatment for women: the MATRIx evidence synthesis.关于为女性实施围产期心理健康护理和治疗的障碍与促进因素的概念框架:MATRIx证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(2):1-187. doi: 10.3310/KQFE0107.
9
Meta-review of the barriers and facilitators to women accessing perinatal mental healthcare.对女性获得围产期心理健康保健的障碍和促进因素的元审查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 20;13(7):e066703. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066703.
10
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal mental health in India in the states of Haryana and Telangana: A district-level situational analysis.印度哈里亚纳邦和特伦甘纳邦的围产期心理健康:区级情况分析。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2025 Jun 30;12:e93. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2025.10021. eCollection 2025.
2
Prevalence and incidence of moderate and severe mental illness in the second postpartum year in England (1995-2020): a national retrospective cohort study using primary care data.英格兰产后第二年中重度精神疾病的患病率和发病率(1995 - 2020年):一项使用初级保健数据的全国性回顾性队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 9;53:101312. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101312. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Social determinants of antenatal depression and anxiety among women in South Asia: A systematic review & meta-analysis.南亚女性产前抑郁和焦虑的社会决定因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 9;17(2):e0263760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263760. eCollection 2022.
2
Knowledge and attitudes of family members towards postpartum depression.家庭成员对产后抑郁症的认知和态度。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2020 Dec;34(6):492-496. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
Psychiatric Morbidity, Cultural Factors, and Health-Seeking Behaviour in Perinatal Women: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Centre of North India.
Antenatal group-based psychoeducation to improve postpartum depression literacy in primary health care institutions in Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
基于小组的产前心理教育以提高埃塞俄比亚初级卫生保健机构中产后抑郁症知识水平:一项整群随机对照试验。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 17;16:1548356. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1548356. eCollection 2025.
4
Exploring the acceptability, feasibility and utility of a digital tool for self-reporting perinatal anxiety and depression in urban obstetric and paediatric clinics in India.探索一种数字工具在印度城市产科和儿科诊所用于自我报告围产期焦虑和抑郁的可接受性、可行性和实用性。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 28;11:20552076251314101. doi: 10.1177/20552076251314101. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
5
Effect of technology-supported mindfulness-based interventions for maternal depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis with implementation perspectives for resource-limited settings.技术支持的正念减压干预对产后抑郁的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析以及针对资源有限环境的实施视角
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07286-9.
6
Trends in the prevalence of antenatal and postnatal depression in Bangladesh: A systematic review and meta-analysis.孟加拉国产前和产后抑郁症患病率的趋势:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 14;11(2):e41955. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41955. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
7
Legal interventions for perinatal depression in India: a qualitative study with clinical specialists having expertise in perinatal mental health.印度围产期抑郁症的法律干预措施:一项针对围产期心理健康领域临床专家的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 2;15(1):e093027. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093027.
8
A qualitative study of how maternal morbidities impact women's quality of life during pregnancy and postpartum in five countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia.一项关于撒哈拉以南非洲和南亚五个国家孕产妇疾病如何影响妇女孕期和产后生活质量的定性研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 15:2025.01.14.25320557. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.14.25320557.
9
Conceptualizing maternal mental health in rural Ghana: a realist qualitative analysis.加纳农村地区孕产妇心理健康的概念化:一项实在论质性分析
Health Policy Plan. 2025 Feb 6;40(2):244-258. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czae116.
10
Mental disorders during pregnancy and postpartum in Bangladesh: A narrative review.孟加拉国孕期和产后的精神障碍:一项叙述性综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 28;7(9):e70027. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70027. eCollection 2024 Sep.
围产期妇女的精神疾病发病率、文化因素与求医行为:来自印度北部一家三级护理中心的横断面研究
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Jan 6;42(1):52-60. doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_96_19. eCollection 2020 Jan-Feb.
4
'Good health means being mentally, socially, emotionally and physically fit': women's understanding of health and ill health during and after pregnancy in India and Pakistan: a qualitative study.“良好的健康意味着在精神、社会、情感和身体方面都健康”:印度和巴基斯坦女性在怀孕中和怀孕后对健康和疾病的理解:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):e028760. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028760.
5
Perinatal depression-knowledge gap among service providers and service utilizers in India.围产期抑郁症——印度服务提供者和服务使用者之间的知识差距。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jan;47:101822. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
"I just wish it becomes part of routine care": healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of screening for maternal mental health during and after pregnancy: a qualitative study.“我只希望它成为常规护理的一部分”:医护人员在孕期和产后筛查孕产妇心理健康方面的知识、态度和看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2261-x.
7
A systematic review of ethnic minority women's experiences of perinatal mental health conditions and services in Europe.一项关于欧洲少数民族妇女围产期心理健康状况和服务体验的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 29;14(1):e0210587. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210587. eCollection 2019.
8
Barriers to accessing mental health services for women with perinatal mental illness: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies in the UK.英国围产期精神疾病女性获得心理健康服务的障碍:系统评价和定性研究的元综合。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024803. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024803.
9
Association Of Antenatal Depression And Household Food Insecurity Among Pregnant Women: A Crosssectional Study From Slums Of Lahore.孕妇产前抑郁与家庭粮食不安全状况的关联:一项来自拉合尔贫民窟的横断面研究
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018 Jul-Sep;30(3):366-371.
10
Perception and Attitude toward Mental Illness in Antenatal Mothers in Rural Population of Southern India: A Cross-Sectional Study.印度南部农村地区产前母亲对精神疾病的认知与态度:一项横断面研究。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018 Oct-Dec;9(4):473-477. doi: 10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_535_17.