Luan Anna, Friedrich Jeffrey, Giladi Aviram, Mithani Suhail K, Rhee Peter, Safa Bauback, Strohl Adam, Eberlin Kyle R
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
J Hand Surg Am. 2025 Apr;50(4):407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.014. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
The assessment, prognostication, and decision-making for mangled digital injuries can be challenging, even for experienced surgeons. This study aimed to develop a Mangled Digit Severity Score (MDSS) to predict whether a mangled digit should be salvaged.
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 67 hand surgeons at seven hand trauma centers as an initial survey panel. Participants were provided a list of factors influencing outcomes following a mangled digit injury and were asked to assign weights from 0-10 for each factor reflecting its relative importance in determining likelihood of functional salvage versus failure or secondary amputation. Using a modified Delphi method, iterative questionnaire rounds then were performed with seven expert panelists and consensus established. The final ratings were used to develop a weighted scoring system to assess mangled digits. A retrospective single-center review was conducted to validate the scoring system. The sensitivity and specificity for amputation at different MDSS prognostic thresholds were evaluated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were calculated.
From initial surgeon responses (36/67 response rate) and two subsequent rating rounds, consensus was achieved on 14 factors, including crush/avulsion mechanism, intraarticular fracture, and zone II flexor tendon injury. Final weights for all factors ranged between 3-9. Among 54 mangled digits reviewed, digits that were salvaged had a significantly lower MDSS than those that underwent amputation. The MDSS demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.87. At a threshold of 35, the MDSS achieved a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% in predicting amputation.
The MDSS was developed through a consensus of experts and is a useful tool for identifying mangled digits that may not be salvageable.
The MDSS provides a structured framework for the assessment of severely injured digits with a prognostic guideline for amputation or salvage.
对于毁损性手指损伤的评估、预后判断及决策制定颇具挑战性,即便对于经验丰富的外科医生亦是如此。本研究旨在开发一种毁损性手指严重程度评分(MDSS),以预测毁损性手指是否应予以保肢。
向7家手外伤中心的67位手外科医生发送了一份匿名调查问卷作为初始调查小组。向参与者提供了一份影响毁损性手指损伤后预后的因素清单,并要求他们为每个因素从0至10分配权重,以反映其在确定功能保肢与失败或二期截肢可能性方面的相对重要性。采用改良德尔菲法,随后与7位专家小组成员进行了多轮问卷调查并达成共识。最终评分用于开发一个加权评分系统以评估毁损性手指。进行了一项回顾性单中心研究以验证该评分系统。评估了不同MDSS预后阈值下截肢的敏感性和特异性,并计算了受试者工作特征曲线及曲线下面积。
根据最初外科医生的回复(回复率为36/67)以及随后的两轮评分,就14个因素达成了共识,包括挤压/撕脱机制、关节内骨折和Ⅱ区屈肌腱损伤。所有因素的最终权重在3至9之间。在回顾的54例毁损性手指中,保肢的手指MDSS显著低于接受截肢的手指。MDSS的曲线下面积为0.87。在阈值为35时,MDSS在预测截肢方面的敏感性为60%,特异性为88%。
MDSS是通过专家共识开发的,是识别可能无法保肢的毁损性手指的有用工具。
MDSS为评估严重受伤手指提供了一个结构化框架,并为截肢或保肢提供了预后指导。