Sanghvi Anup Palak, Klumb Ivette, Kanani Charmi, Karmarkar Amol, Kazior Michael
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA.
Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA.
JPRAS Open. 2024 Dec 19;43:393-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.12.006. eCollection 2025 Mar.
The pectoral nerve (PECs) block I and II nerve blocks with liposomal bupivacaine (LB, Exparel) are used for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery, but evidence on efficacy for breast reduction is limited. We examined the effect of the PECS I and II blocks with LB on perioperative opioid use and pain scores compared to no block and blocks with plain local anesthetic (LA). We hypothesized that patients receiving a block with LB would require lower opioid amounts.
This retrospective cohort analysis included 120 patients undergoing breast reduction from 2011-2023. Patients received: no block, PECs block with plain LA, or PECs block with LB. Primary outcomes were intraoperative, Post-Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU), and outpatient opioid requirements. The secondary outcomes were PACU pain scores.
Forty patients had no block, twenty-six received plain LA block, and fifty-four received LB block. For intraoperative opioids, LB block significantly lowered use compared to no block. PACU opioid use showed no differences between groups. For outpatient opioids, both LB and plain LA blocks significantly lowered use compared to no block. No significant pain score differences were found between groups.
Patients receiving the PECS block had decreased outpatient narcotic requirements compared to those patients who did not get the block. Patients receiving PECS block with LB had the further benefit of having decreased intraoperative narcotic requirements compared to the other groups. This highlights the potential benefit of performing the PECS block for patients undergoing breast reduction surgery.
采用脂质体布比卡因(LB,商品名Exparel)进行胸肌神经(PECs)Ⅰ和Ⅱ神经阻滞用于乳腺手术的术后镇痛,但关于其在巨乳缩小术中疗效的证据有限。我们比较了与不进行阻滞以及使用普通局部麻醉剂(LA)进行阻滞相比,采用LB进行PECsⅠ和Ⅱ神经阻滞对围手术期阿片类药物使用和疼痛评分的影响。我们假设接受LB阻滞的患者所需阿片类药物量更低。
这项回顾性队列分析纳入了2011年至2023年期间接受巨乳缩小术的120例患者。患者接受:不进行阻滞、采用普通LA进行PECs阻滞或采用LB进行PECs阻滞。主要结局为术中、麻醉后恢复室(PACU)和门诊阿片类药物需求量。次要结局为PACU疼痛评分。
40例患者未进行阻滞,26例接受普通LA阻滞,54例接受LB阻滞。对于术中阿片类药物,与不进行阻滞相比,LB阻滞显著降低了用量。PACU阿片类药物使用在各组之间无差异。对于门诊阿片类药物,与不进行阻滞相比,LB和普通LA阻滞均显著降低了用量。各组之间未发现显著的疼痛评分差异。
与未接受阻滞的患者相比,接受PECs阻滞的患者门诊麻醉药品需求量减少。与其他组相比,接受LB进行PECs阻滞的患者还有术中麻醉药品需求量减少的额外益处。这凸显了对接受巨乳缩小手术的患者进行PECs阻滞的潜在益处。