Srinivasan Varadharajan, San Sebastián Miguel, Rana Samson, Bhatt Pooja, Armstrong Greg, Deshpande Smita, Mathias Kaaren
Project Burans, Herbertpur Christian Hospital (Emmanuel Hospital Association), New Delhi, India.
The George Institute for Global Health, Jasola Vihar, New Delhi, India.
Glob Health Action. 2025 Dec;18(1):2455236. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2455236. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
Mental health problems are the leading cause of disease burden among young people in India. While evidence shows that youth mental health and resilience can be improved with group interventions in school settings, such an intervention has not been robustly evaluated in informal urban settings.
This study aimed to evaluate whether the Nae Disha 3 group intervention could improve youth resilience, mental health and gender equal attitudes among disadvantaged young people from low-income urban communities in India.
This cluster randomised controlled trial used an analytic sample of 476 adolescents and young adults aged 11-25 years from randomised clusters in urban Dehradun, India. The 251 intervention group participants were 112 boys and 139 girls, and the 225 young people in the wait-control group were 101 boys and 124 girls. Five validated tools measuring resilience gender equity and mental health were filled by participants at three different points in time.
Difference in difference (DiD) analysis at T2 showed that scores improved among girls in intervention group, for adjusted model, resilience (DiD = 4.12; 95% CI: 2.14, 6.09) and among boys, for resilience (DiD = 5.82; 95% CI: 1.57, 9.74).
The Nae Disha 3 intervention among disadvantaged urban youth moderately improved resilience for both young men and women, though it did not significantly impact mental health, self-efficacy, or gender-equal attitudes. We establish potential merit for this approach to youth mental health but recommend further research to examine active ingredients and the ideal duration of such group interventions.
心理健康问题是印度年轻人疾病负担的主要原因。虽然有证据表明,在学校环境中通过团体干预可以改善青少年心理健康和恢复力,但在城市非正式环境中尚未对这种干预进行充分评估。
本研究旨在评估“新方向3”团体干预是否能提高印度低收入城市社区弱势青年的恢复力、心理健康和性别平等态度。
这项整群随机对照试验采用了来自印度德拉敦市随机整群的476名11至25岁青少年和青年作为分析样本。干预组的251名参与者中有112名男孩和139名女孩,等待对照组的225名年轻人中有101名男孩和124名女孩。参与者在三个不同时间点填写了五份经过验证的测量恢复力、性别平等和心理健康的工具。
在T2时的差异分析表明,干预组女孩的得分有所提高,对于调整后的模型,恢复力方面(差异=4.12;95%置信区间:2.14,6.09),男孩在恢复力方面(差异=5.82;95%置信区间:1.57,9.74)。
针对弱势城市青年的“新方向3”干预适度提高了青年男性和女性的恢复力,尽管它对心理健康、自我效能或性别平等态度没有显著影响。我们确立了这种青少年心理健康方法的潜在价值,但建议进一步研究以检验此类团体干预的有效成分和理想持续时间。