Srinivas Shruthi, Nahum Kelly, Gilliam Christopher, Brigode William, Doris Stephanie, Egodage Tanya, Kincaid Michelle, Liveris Anna, McBride Katherine, Mukherjee Kaushik, Edmundson Philip, Penaloza-Villalobos Liz, Roden-Foreman Jacob W, Song Joy, Stecher Johanna, Tigano Anthony, Tracy Brett
Division of Trauma, Critical Care, and Burn Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Trauma and Burn, Cook County Health, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2025 Jun;26(5):279-285. doi: 10.1089/sur.2024.208. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is linked to poor outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), yet its effect on cognitive disability is unknown. We hypothesized that there would be an association between severe cognitive disability and VAP in this patient population. We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multi-center, observational study of adults with a severe, blunt TBI from 2020 to 2023. Patients were grouped by whether they developed VAP. Our primary outcome was severe cognitive disability, defined as a disability rating scale (DRS) score >13 at discharge (or 28 days post-injury if not discharged). There were 309 patients in the cohort; 31.7% ( = 98) developed VAP. The VAP group had greater incidences of diffuse axonal injury (37.3% vs. 22.3%, p = 0.004), neurosurgical interventions (63.3 vs. 38.4%, p < 0.001), and tracheostomies (72.5% vs. 28.9%, p < 0.001). Patients with VAP had a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (13 d vs. 3 d, p < 0.001). Among patients with VAP, median time to diagnosis was 7 days (4-12), time to tracheostomy was 10 days (7-16), and time between the two events was 4 days (2-11). Greater proportions of cognitive disability (64.3% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001) and worse median DRS scores (8 vs. 2, p < 0.001) occurred in the VAP group. On multi-variable regression analysis, VAP was an independent risk factor for severe cognitive disability (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.2-7.8). Ventilator-associated pneumonia is common among patients with a severe TBI and is a risk factor for severe cognitive disability. Adherence to VAP prevention techniques may help mitigate cognitive impairment in this population.
呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)与重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的不良预后相关,但其对认知障碍的影响尚不清楚。我们假设在该患者群体中,重度认知障碍与VAP之间存在关联。我们对一项2020年至2023年针对成年重度钝性TBI患者的前瞻性、多中心观察性研究进行了事后分析。患者按是否发生VAP进行分组。我们的主要结局是重度认知障碍,定义为出院时(或受伤后28天,若未出院)残疾评定量表(DRS)得分>13。该队列中有309名患者;31.7%(n = 98)发生了VAP。VAP组弥漫性轴索损伤的发生率更高(37.3%对22.3%,p = 0.004)、神经外科干预更多(63.3对38.4%,p < 0.001)以及气管切开术更多(72.5%对28.9%,p < 0.001)。发生VAP的患者机械通气时间更长(13天对3天,p < 0.001)。在发生VAP的患者中,诊断的中位时间为7天(4 - 12天),气管切开术的时间为10天(7 - 16天),这两个事件之间的时间为4天(2 - 11天)。VAP组认知障碍的比例更高(64.3%对19.9%,p < 0.001),且DRS中位得分更差(8对2,p < 0.001)。在多变量回归分析中,VAP是重度认知障碍的独立危险因素(调整后的优势比[aOR]:4.2,95%置信区间:2.2 - 7.8)。呼吸机相关性肺炎在重度TBI患者中很常见,并且是重度认知障碍的一个危险因素。坚持VAP预防技术可能有助于减轻该人群的认知损害。