Suppr超能文献

用于放射治疗的3D打印 bolus 的验证:一项概念验证研究。

Validation of a 3D printed bolus for radiotherapy: a proof-of-concept study.

作者信息

Ciobanu A C, Petcu L C, Járai-Szabó F, Bálint Z

机构信息

Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Ovidius Clinical Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Constanţa, Romania.

出版信息

Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025 Feb 12;11(2). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/adb15d.

Abstract

3D-printed boluses in radiation therapy are of increasing interest for enhancing treatment precision and patient comfort. A comprehensive clinical validation of these boluses remains to be established. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of a 3D-printed bolus through a proof-of-concept comparative validation, by implementing in a clinical setting a bolus made of PLA and designed to ensure uniform dose coverage for a case in the eye region. In this study the 3D-printed bolus was compared to two commercially available boluses (one thermoplastic and one skin type) by using a refecence where no bolus was present (with the optimal dose distribution scenario). All boluses were placed on an anthropomorphic head phantom and BeOSL detectors were used to measure dose values to determine the level of their effectiveness on delivery. During the scanning process, a thermoplastic mask was used to prevent bolus movement and to accurately reproduce clinical scenarios. Differences in dose values at Dand Drevealed the performance of each bolus. The treatment planning system (TPS) and BeOSL readings for the 3D printed bolus were within 2% (the clinical tolerance), with 0.66% dose difference for the customized 3D-printed bolus. Although the thermoplastic bolus had the closest value to the detector reading, with a score of 0.30%, this result was influenced by improper shaping of the bolus on the phantom and the presence of a wide air gap, which caused lack of eye covering. Whereas, the skin bolus, due to higher volume of air between phantom surface and bolus, showed a 1.29% dose difference between the TPS values and the OSL detector readings. We provide a comparative validation for the use of 3D printed boluses and highlight that proper bolus fitting is essential in clinical settings to avoid air gaps and to maintain dose distribution over multiple treatment sessions.

摘要

放射治疗中用于提高治疗精度和患者舒适度的3D打印填充物越来越受到关注。这些填充物的全面临床验证仍有待确立。本研究旨在通过概念验证性比较验证来确认3D打印填充物的有效性,即在临床环境中使用由聚乳酸制成的、旨在确保眼部区域病例剂量均匀覆盖的填充物。在本研究中,将3D打印填充物与两种市售填充物(一种热塑性和一种皮肤型)进行比较,以不存在填充物的情况(最佳剂量分布方案)作为参考。所有填充物均放置在拟人化头部模型上,并使用BeOSL探测器测量剂量值,以确定它们在给药时的有效性水平。在扫描过程中,使用热塑性面罩防止填充物移动并准确再现临床场景。D和D处剂量值的差异揭示了每种填充物的性能。3D打印填充物的治疗计划系统(TPS)和BeOSL读数在2%以内(临床容差),定制的3D打印填充物的剂量差异为0.66%。尽管热塑性填充物与探测器读数最接近,得分为0.30%,但这一结果受到模型上填充物形状不当以及存在宽气隙的影响,导致眼部覆盖不足。而皮肤填充物由于模型表面与填充物之间的空气体积较大,TPS值与OSL探测器读数之间的剂量差异为1.29%。我们对3D打印填充物的使用进行了比较验证,并强调在临床环境中合适的填充物贴合至关重要,以避免气隙并在多个治疗疗程中维持剂量分布。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验