Fong Michael W K, Pu Kelly, Beekman Rachel, Kim Noah, Nguyen Christine, Gilmore Emily J, Hirsch Lawrence J, Zaveri Hitten P
Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Epilepsy Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Westmead Comprehensive Epilepsy Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02208-7.
The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of identical bursts (IBs) in cardiac arrest survivors with burst suppression on continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Burst suppression with IBs is associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of cardiac arrest survivors admitted to a US academic medical center between 2013 and 2021 who had an EEG background of burst suppression. EEG and clinical features were extracted from our institutional review board-approved repositories. EEG features were qualitatively and quantitatively rated at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h following initiation of monitoring. Qualitative visual assessment occurred, blinded to all clinical features, including outcomes, and in accordance with the current American Clinical Neurophysiology Society definition. Quantitative assessment involved manual marking of 50 consecutive pairs of bursts and interburst intervals (IBIs) for analysis. Similarity of bursts/IBIs were assessed with correlation coefficients. The primary clinical outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Comparisons were performed between groups, and a multivariate model was generated for significant variables.
Of 593 cardiac arrest patients, 203 (34.2%) had burst suppression. Thirty-one (15.3%) patients with burst suppression survived. IBs were detected in 80 patients (39.4% of burst suppression). No patient with qualitatively identified IBs had a good neurological outcome (76 deceased, 4 in a state of unresponsive wakefulness). Whereas 11 of 123 (8.9%) with burst suppression without IB had Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2. Quantitative analysis of 268 instances of burst suppression demonstrated that mortality was associated with longer bursts, longer IBIs, and higher burst correlation coefficients (i.e., bursts that were more similar to each other) only when allowing analysis of the first 2 s of bursts. Binary logistic regression showed that the only independent EEG predictor of mortality was the burst correlation coefficient measured over 2 s (adjusted odds ratio 4.82 [95% confidence interval 1.21-8.42], p = 0.009).
Using a single-center US cohort, IBs within 72 h post cardiac arrest were strongly associated with poor outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed that including the first 2 s of the bursts was superior to limiting the analysis to 0.5-1 s.
本研究的目的是评估心脏骤停幸存者在持续脑电图(cEEG)监测中出现爆发抑制时,相同爆发(IBs)的预后意义。伴有IBs的爆发抑制与不良的神经学预后和死亡率相关。
我们对2013年至2021年期间入住美国一家学术医疗中心的心脏骤停幸存者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者脑电图背景为爆发抑制。脑电图和临床特征从我们机构审查委员会批准的资料库中提取。在监测开始后的0、12、24、48和72小时对脑电图特征进行定性和定量评分。定性视觉评估在对所有临床特征(包括预后)不知情的情况下进行,并符合美国临床神经生理学会目前的定义。定量评估包括手动标记50对连续的爆发和爆发间隔(IBIs)进行分析。用相关系数评估爆发/IBIs的相似性。主要临床结局是存活至出院。对组间进行比较,并为显著变量生成多变量模型。
在593例心脏骤停患者中,203例(34.2%)出现爆发抑制。31例(15.3%)爆发抑制患者存活。80例患者(占爆发抑制患者的39.4%)检测到IBs。定性识别出有IBs的患者无一有良好的神经学预后(76例死亡,4例处于无反应觉醒状态)。而123例爆发抑制但无IBs的患者中有11例(8.9%)脑功能分类评分为1 - 2。对268例爆发抑制实例的定量分析表明,仅在允许分析爆发的前2秒时,死亡率与更长的爆发、更长的IBIs以及更高的爆发相关系数(即彼此更相似的爆发)有关。二元逻辑回归显示,死亡率的唯一独立脑电图预测因素是在2秒内测量的爆发相关系数(调整后的优势比4.82 [95%置信区间1.21 - 8.42],p = 0.009)。
在美国单中心队列研究中,心脏骤停后72小时内的IBs与不良预后密切相关。定量分析显示,纳入爆发的前2秒优于将分析限制在0.5 - 1秒。