Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede.
Departments of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede.
Ann Neurol. 2019 Aug;86(2):203-214. doi: 10.1002/ana.25518. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
To provide evidence that early electroencephalography (EEG) allows for reliable prediction of poor or good outcome after cardiac arrest.
In a 5-center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive, comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Continuous EEG recordings were started as soon as possible and continued up to 5 days. Five-minute EEG epochs were assessed by 2 reviewers, independently, at 8 predefined time points from 6 hours to 5 days after cardiac arrest, blinded for patients' actual condition, treatment, and outcome. EEG patterns were categorized as generalized suppression (<10 μV), synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression, continuous, or other. Outcome at 6 months was categorized as good (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] = 1-2) or poor (CPC = 3-5).
We included 850 patients, of whom 46% had a good outcome. Generalized suppression and synchronous patterns with ≥50% suppression predicted poor outcome without false positives at ≥6 hours after cardiac arrest. Their summed sensitivity was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42-0.51) at 12 hours and 0.30 (95% CI = 0.26-0.33) at 24 hours after cardiac arrest, with specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.99-1.00) at both time points. At 36 hours or later, sensitivity for poor outcome was ≤0.22. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours predicted good outcome, with sensitivity of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.46-0.55) and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI = 0.88-0.93); at 24 hours or later, specificity for the prediction of good outcome was <0.90.
EEG allows for reliable prediction of poor outcome after cardiac arrest, with maximum sensitivity in the first 24 hours. Continuous EEG patterns at 12 hours after cardiac arrest are associated with good recovery. ANN NEUROL 2019;86:203-214.
提供证据表明早期脑电图(EEG)可可靠预测心脏骤停后预后不良或良好。
在一项 5 中心前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了连续昏迷的心脏骤停幸存者。一旦可能,即开始进行连续 EEG 记录,并持续至 5 天。由 2 名审阅者独立评估 8 个预设时间点(从心脏骤停后 6 小时到 5 天)的 5 分钟 EEG 片段,对患者的实际情况、治疗和结果保持盲法。EEG 模式分为广泛抑制(<10μV)、≥50%抑制的同步模式、连续模式或其他模式。6 个月时的预后分为良好(Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] = 1-2)或不良(CPC = 3-5)。
我们纳入了 850 例患者,其中 46%预后良好。广泛抑制和≥50%抑制的同步模式在心脏骤停后≥6 小时预测不良预后,且无假阳性。在心脏骤停后 12 小时和 24 小时,其联合灵敏度分别为 0.47(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.42-0.51)和 0.30(95% CI = 0.26-0.33),特异性均为 1.00(95% CI = 0.99-1.00)。在 36 小时或更晚时,不良预后的敏感性≤0.22。心脏骤停后 12 小时的连续 EEG 模式预测良好预后,灵敏度为 0.50(95% CI = 0.46-0.55),特异性为 0.91(95% CI = 0.88-0.93);在 24 小时或更晚时,良好预后预测的特异性<0.90。
EEG 可可靠预测心脏骤停后的不良预后,在最初 24 小时内具有最高的敏感性。心脏骤停后 12 小时的连续 EEG 模式与良好的恢复相关。