• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证一种新型通用患者报告结局指标——成人术后恢复量表(PRSA):一项前瞻性观察研究。

Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Liu Yijun, Yu Rou, Fu Yifan, Zuo Yunxia, Qiu Yanhua, Liu Jin

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

The Research Units of West China (2018RU012)-Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jan 30;19:243-253. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S485263. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S485263
PMID:39901902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11789672/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quality of postoperative recovery is an important perioperative patient-reported outcome. However, there are limitations in the development process and content of existing scales.

PURPOSE

To develop and validate a universal patient-reported outcome measure, the postoperative recovery scale for adult (PRSA), to assess early and long-term postoperative recovery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The PRSA was developed through a new conceptual framework, systematic literature review, patient interview, and Delphi consultation. Then, the PRSA and the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) were employed to evaluate the measurement properties of PRSA in 180 adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

A 10-item PRSA scale was developed through a systematic review of 1602 literature, interviews with 138 patients, and two rounds of Delphi consultation. The correlation coefficient between the PRSA and QoR-15 ranged from 0.780 to 0.904 ( < 0.001), and the PRSA indicated great validity in distinguishing patients with complications. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the PRSA were satisfactory. Besides, the time to complete the PRSA was 27.5s (95% CI: 24.5-30.0 s) shorter than QoR-15, and more patients thought that completing the PRSA was easy compared to QoR-15 (65.7% vs 57.2%, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The PRSA scale is a universal patient-reported outcome measure that can be utilized for evaluating postoperative recovery. It shows great measurement properties in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

术后恢复质量是围手术期患者报告的一项重要结局。然而,现有量表的开发过程和内容存在局限性。

目的

开发并验证一种通用的患者报告结局测量工具——成人术后恢复量表(PRSA),以评估术后早期和长期恢复情况。

患者与方法

PRSA通过新的概念框架、系统的文献综述、患者访谈和德尔菲咨询开发而成。然后,使用PRSA和15项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)评估180例接受腹部手术的成年患者中PRSA的测量特性。

结果

通过对1602篇文献的系统综述、对138例患者的访谈以及两轮德尔菲咨询,开发出了一个包含10个条目的PRSA量表。PRSA与QoR-15之间的相关系数在0.780至0.904之间(<0.001),PRSA在区分有并发症的患者方面显示出良好的效度。PRSA的内部一致性和重测信度令人满意。此外,完成PRSA的时间比QoR-15短27.5秒(95%CI:24.5 - 30.0秒),与QoR-15相比,更多患者认为完成PRSA更容易(65.7%对57.2%,<0.001)。

结论

PRSA量表是一种通用的患者报告结局测量工具,可用于评估术后恢复情况。它在接受腹部手术的患者中显示出良好的测量特性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fce3/11789672/20cafa910abd/PPA-19-243-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fce3/11789672/20cafa910abd/PPA-19-243-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fce3/11789672/20cafa910abd/PPA-19-243-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing and Validating a Novel Generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure - Postoperative Recovery Scale for Adult (PRSA): A Prospective Observational Study.开发并验证一种新型通用患者报告结局指标——成人术后恢复量表(PRSA):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025 Jan 30;19:243-253. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S485263. eCollection 2025.
2
Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用 15 项术后恢复质量量表测量术后恢复质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Jun;128(6):1029-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Validation and clinical utility of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 with enhanced recovery after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.验证和临床实用的韩文版的质量恢复- 15 与手术后恢复增强:前瞻性观察队列研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):614-621. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.040. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Validation of the Thai version of the quality of recovery scale (QoR-14-Thai) after elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.全身麻醉下择期腹部手术后泰国版恢复质量量表(QoR - 14 - Thai)的验证
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 23;25(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03044-8.
5
Validation of the Dutch translation of the quality of recovery-15 scale.验证质量恢复-15 量表的荷兰语翻译。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01784-5.
6
Validation of the translated Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire in a French-speaking population.验证 Quality of Recovery-15 问卷在讲法语人群中的翻译版本。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):761-767. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
7
Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.验证质量恢复评分 QoR-40 的日文版。
J Anesth. 2011 Aug;25(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1151-2. Epub 2011 May 31.
8
Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.成人全身麻醉和手术后恢复质量评分的开发与心理测量测试
Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.
9
Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.术后恢复质量评分 QoR-15 挪威语版的翻译和验证。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Jan;68(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/aas.14322. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
10
Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40.术后恢复质量评分(QoR-40)的有效性和可靠性
Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of postoperative recovery: past, present and future.术后恢复评估:过去、现在和未来。
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Jul 21;99(1174):808-814. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2022-141652.
2
An Updated Minimal Clinically Important Difference for the QoR-15 Scale.QoR-15量表的最新最小临床重要差异
Anesthesiology. 2021 Nov 1;135(5):934-935. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003977.
3
Anaesthesia, analgesia, and the surgical stress response.麻醉、镇痛与手术应激反应。
BJA Educ. 2020 Sep;20(9):321-328. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Patient-reported outcomes for ambulatory surgery.门诊手术的患者报告结局。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;33(6):768-773. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000921.
5
Is the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in acute pain a good measure of analgesic efficacy in regional anesthesia?在区域麻醉中,急性疼痛的最小临床重要差异(MCID)是否是衡量镇痛效果的良好指标?
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Dec;45(12):1000-1005. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101670. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
Guidelines for day-case surgery 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the British Association of Day Surgery.2019 日间手术指南:麻醉师协会和英国日间手术协会指南。
Anaesthesia. 2019 Jun;74(6):778-792. doi: 10.1111/anae.14639. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
7
Global burden of postoperative death.术后死亡的全球负担。
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):401. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33139-8.
8
Severity classification of the quality of recovery-15 score-An observational study.恢复质量-15 评分的严重程度分类——一项观察性研究。
J Surg Res. 2018 May;225:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.040. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort.系统评价和共识定义标准化围手术期医学(StEP)倡议的标准终点:患者舒适度。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):705-711. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review.术后加速康复:综述。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952.