Suppr超能文献

成人全身麻醉和手术后恢复质量评分的开发与心理测量测试

Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

作者信息

Myles P S, Hunt J O, Nightingale C E, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford J L

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 1999 Jan;88(1):83-90. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

A variety of methods have been used to quantify aspects of recovery after anesthesia. Most are narrowly focused, are not patient-rated, and have not been validated. We therefore set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score. We constructed a 61-item questionnaire that asked individuals (patients and relatives, medical and nursing staff; total n = 136) to rate various postoperative items describing features a patient may experience postoperatively. The most highly ranked items were included in a final nine-point index score, which we called the "QoR Score." We then studied two cohorts of surgical patients (n = 449). There was good convergent validity between the QoR Score and the visual analog scale score (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Discriminant construct validity was supported by comparing resultant QoR Scores in patients undergoing day-stay, minor, and major surgery (P = 0.008), as well as a negative correlation with duration of hospital stay (rho = -0.20, P < 0.0001), and, using multivariate regression, demonstrating a significant negative relationship between QoR Score and female gender (P = 0.048) and older age (P = 0.041). There was also good interrater agreement (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001), test-retest reliability (median rho = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and internal consistency (alpha = 0.57 and 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the groups of patients recovering from major and minor surgery (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the QoR Score has good validity, reliability, and clinical acceptability in patients undergoing many types of surgery.

IMPLICATIONS

We set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score (QoR) that could be used both as a measure of outcome in perioperative trials and for clinical audit. We first surveyed patients and staff to identify important aspects of recovery, then developed a nine-point QoR Score. This was then compared with other measures of postoperative outcome. We found that the QoR Score is a useful measure of recovery after anesthesia and surgery.

摘要

未标注

已经使用了多种方法来量化麻醉后的恢复情况。大多数方法关注面狭窄,不是患者自评的,且未经验证。因此,我们着手开发一种患者自评的恢复质量评分。我们构建了一份包含61个条目的问卷,要求个人(患者及其亲属、医护人员;共136人)对描述患者术后可能经历的各种术后项目进行评分。排名最高的项目被纳入最终的九点指数评分,我们称之为“QoR评分”。然后我们研究了两组手术患者(共449人)。QoR评分与视觉模拟量表评分之间具有良好的收敛效度(rho = 0.55,P < 0.0001)。通过比较日间手术、小型手术和大型手术患者的QoR评分结果(P = 0.008),以及与住院时间的负相关(rho = -0.20,P < 0.0001),并使用多变量回归分析,证明QoR评分与女性性别(P = 0.048)和年龄较大(P = 0.041)之间存在显著的负相关关系,从而支持了判别性结构效度。同时还具有良好的评分者间一致性(rho = 0.55,P < 0.0001)、重测信度(中位数rho = 0.61,P < 0.0001)和内部一致性(alpha = 0.57和0.90,P < 0.0001)。大型手术和小型手术恢复的患者组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。这项研究表明,QoR评分在接受多种类型手术的患者中具有良好的效度、信度和临床可接受性。

启示

我们着手开发一种患者自评的恢复质量评分(QoR),该评分既可以用作围手术期试验的结果衡量指标,也可用于临床审计。我们首先对患者和工作人员进行调查,以确定恢复的重要方面,然后开发了九点QoR评分。然后将其与其他术后结果衡量指标进行比较。我们发现QoR评分是麻醉和手术后恢复情况的有用衡量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验