Wicki Matthias, Marmet Simon, Studer Joseph, Bloomfield Kim, Gmel Gerhard
Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute for Research, Development and Evaluation, Bern University of Teacher Education, Bern, Switzerland.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 20;15:1416062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416062. eCollection 2024.
Individuals with a minority sexual orientation have consistently been found to face a greater risk of mental health problems and problematic substance use than heterosexual individuals. The present study examined whether differences in alcohol use or alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms across the spectrum of sexual orientations could be explained by drinking motives (i.e., enhancement, social, coping and conformity motives).
A non-self-selective sample of non-abstinent, young Swiss men (N = 5,139; mean age = 25.4, SD = 1.25) completed a self-reporting questionnaire on sexual orientation (on a five-point attraction scale: heterosexual, mostly-heterosexual, bisexual, mostly-homosexual, homosexual), drinking motives, alcohol use indicators (e.g., heavy episodic drinking, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption [AUDIT-C]), and AUD symptoms. Structural equation modeling was used to test whether drinking motives mediated the associations between dummy-coded sexual orientation (with heterosexual men as the reference) and alcohol use indicators or AUD symptoms.
Mostly-heterosexual men exhibited higher scores on alcohol use indicators than heterosexual men, with almost full mediation through their drinking motives, specifically higher enhancement motives. They also reported more AUD symptoms, partially mediated through drinking motives, with comparable contributions from enhancement and coping motives. Homosexual men, however, displayed similar or lower scores for alcohol use indicators and AUD symptoms than heterosexual men, but these differences were not mediated by drinking motives. Indeed, homosexual men exhibited greater coping motives than heterosexual men. No significant results or discernible patterns emerged for bisexual or mostly-homosexual men.
These findings highlight the importance of considering the full spectrum of sexual orientations in healthcare and of broadening the focus on drinking motives beyond coping. Understanding the varied motives for alcohol use across the spectrum of sexual orientations facilitates tailored prevention strategies.
一直以来,性取向为少数群体的个体被发现比异性恋个体面临更大的心理健康问题风险和物质使用问题风险。本研究探讨了性取向范围内饮酒或酒精使用障碍(AUD)症状的差异是否可以通过饮酒动机(即强化、社交、应对和从众动机)来解释。
一个由非戒酒的瑞士年轻男性组成的非自我选择样本(N = 5139;平均年龄 = 25.4,标准差 = 1.25)完成了一份关于性取向(五分吸引力量表:异性恋、多数为异性恋、双性恋、多数为同性恋、同性恋)、饮酒动机、酒精使用指标(如大量饮酒、酒精使用障碍识别测试 - 消费版[AUDIT - C])和AUD症状的自我报告问卷。结构方程模型用于检验饮酒动机是否介导了虚拟编码的性取向(以异性恋男性为参照)与酒精使用指标或AUD症状之间的关联。
多数为异性恋的男性在酒精使用指标上的得分高于异性恋男性,几乎完全通过他们的饮酒动机来介导,特别是更高的强化动机。他们还报告了更多的AUD症状,部分通过饮酒动机介导,强化和应对动机的贡献相当。然而,同性恋男性在酒精使用指标和AUD症状上的得分与异性恋男性相似或更低,但这些差异未通过饮酒动机介导。事实上,同性恋男性比异性恋男性表现出更强的应对动机。双性恋或多数为同性恋的男性未出现显著结果或可辨别的模式。
这些发现凸显了在医疗保健中考虑性取向全谱以及将饮酒动机的关注范围扩大到应对之外的重要性。了解性取向范围内不同的饮酒动机有助于制定针对性的预防策略。