Borhany Hojjat
Faculty of Environmental Science, Department of Environmental Science, Informatic, and Statistics, University of Ca' Foscari Venice, Mestre (VE), Italy.
JMIRx Med. 2025 Feb 4;6:e50458. doi: 10.2196/50458.
Italy can augment its profit from biorefinery products by altering the operation of digesters or different designs to obtain more precious bioproducts like volatile fatty acids (VFAs) than biogas from organic municipal solid waste. In this context, recognizing the process stability and outputs through operational interventions and its technical and economic feasibility is a critical issue. Hence, this study involves an anaerobic digester in Treviso in northern Italy.
This research compares a novel line, consisting of pretreatment, acidogenic fermentation, and anaerobic digestion, with single-step anaerobic digestion regarding financial profit and surplus energy. Therefore, a mass flow model was created and refined based on the outputs from the experimental and numerical studies. These studies examine the influence of hydraulic retention time (HRT), pretreatment, biochar addition, and fine-tuned feedstock/inoculum (FS/IN) ratio on bioproducts and operational parameters.
VFA concentration, VFA weight ratio distribution, and biogas yield were quantified by gas chromatography. A t test was then conducted to analyze the significance of dissimilar HRTs in changing the VFA content. Further, a feasible biochar dosage was identified for an assumed FS/IN ratio with an adequately long HRT using the first-order rate model. Accordingly, the parameters for a mass flow model were adopted for 70,000 population equivalents to determine the payback period and surplus energy for two scenarios. We also explored the effectiveness of amendments in improving the process kinetics.
Both HRTs were identical concerning the ratio of VFA/soluble chemical oxygen demand (0.88 kg/kg) and VFA weight ratio distribution: mainly, acetic acid (40%), butyric acid (24%), and caproic acid (17%). However, a significantly higher mean VFA content was confirmed for an HRT of 4.5 days than the quantity for an HRT of 3 days (30.77, SD 2.82 vs 27.66, SD 2.45 g-soluble chemical oxygen demand/L), using a t test (t8=-2.68; P=.03; CI=95%). In this research, 83% of the fermented volatile solids were converted into biogas to obtain a specific methane (CH4) production of 0.133 CH4-Nm3/kg-volatile solids. While biochar addition improved only the maximum methane content by 20% (86% volumetric basis [v/v]), the FS/IN ratio of 0.3 volatile solid basis with thermal plus fermentative pretreatment improved the hydrolysis rate substantially (0.57 vs 0.07, 1/d). Furthermore, the biochar dosage of 0.12 g-biochar/g-volatile solids with an HRT of 20 days was identified as a feasible solution. Principally, the payback period for our novel line would be almost 2 years with surplus energy of 2251 megajoules [MJ] per day compared to 45 years and 21,567 MJ per day for single-step anaerobic digestion.
This research elaborates on the advantage of the refined novel line over the single-step anaerobic digestion and confirms its financial and technical feasibility. Further, changing the HRT and other amendments significantly raised the VFA concentration and the process kinetics and stability.
意大利可以通过改变消化器的运行方式或采用不同设计,从生物精炼产品中获取更多利润,从而获得比从城市有机固体废物中制取沼气更珍贵的生物产品,如挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)。在这种情况下,通过操作干预来识别工艺稳定性和产出及其技术和经济可行性是一个关键问题。因此,本研究涉及意大利北部特雷维索的一个厌氧消化器。
本研究比较了一种由预处理、产酸发酵和厌氧消化组成的新工艺路线与单步厌氧消化在经济利润和剩余能量方面的差异。因此,基于实验和数值研究的结果创建并完善了一个质量流模型。这些研究考察了水力停留时间(HRT)、预处理、生物炭添加以及微调的原料/接种物(FS/IN)比例对生物产品和运行参数的影响。
通过气相色谱法定量分析VFA浓度、VFA重量比分布和沼气产量。然后进行t检验,以分析不同HRT对改变VFA含量的显著性。此外,使用一级速率模型,针对假定的FS/IN比例和足够长的HRT确定了可行的生物炭用量。据此,采用质量流模型的参数对70000人口当量进行计算,以确定两种情景下的投资回收期和剩余能量。我们还探讨了添加物对改善工艺动力学的有效性。
就VFA/可溶性化学需氧量的比例(0.88千克/千克)和VFA重量比分布而言,两种HRT情况相同:主要是乙酸(40%)、丁酸(24%)和己酸(17%)。然而,使用t检验(t8 = -2.68;P = 0.03;置信区间 = 95%),确认HRT为4.5天时的平均VFA含量显著高于HRT为3天时的含量(30.77,标准差2.82对27.66,标准差2.45克可溶性化学需氧量/升)。在本研究中,83%的发酵挥发性固体被转化为沼气,以获得0.133立方米甲烷/千克挥发性固体的特定甲烷(CH4)产量。虽然添加生物炭仅使最大甲烷含量提高了20%(体积基准为86% [v/v]),但热加发酵预处理且FS/IN比例为0.3挥发性固体基准时,水解速率显著提高(0.57对0.07,1/天)。此外,确定HRT为20天时,0.12克生物炭/克挥发性固体的生物炭用量是一个可行的解决方案。主要而言,我们新工艺路线的投资回收期约为2年,每天剩余能量为2251兆焦耳[MJ],而单步厌氧消化的投资回收期为45年,每天剩余能量为21567 MJ。
本研究阐述了优化后的新工艺路线相对于单步厌氧消化的优势,并证实了其经济和技术可行性。此外,改变HRT和其他添加物显著提高了VFA浓度以及工艺动力学和稳定性。