Barratt Joel L N, Cantey Paul T, Montgomery Susan P, Straily Anne, Sapp Sarah G H, Qvarnstrom Yvonne, Raphael Brian H
Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2025 Feb 4;112(4):729-732. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.24-0596. Print 2025 Apr 2.
In recent years, multiple reports have emerged describing real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) detection of DNA derived from human parasite species in environmental soil samples. In one such report, sampling was focused in impoverished areas of the southeastern United States, and a link between poverty and the presence of parasite DNA in soil was proposed. Whether transmission of certain parasitic diseases persists in the United States in association with poverty remains an important question. However, we emphasize caution when reviewing interpretations drawn solely from qPCR detection of parasite-derived environmental DNA without further verification. We discuss here the limitations of using qPCR to test environmental DNA samples, the need for sampling strategies that are unbiased and repeatable, and the importance of selecting appropriate control areas and statistical tests to draw meaningful conclusions.
近年来,出现了多篇报告描述在环境土壤样本中对源自人类寄生虫物种的DNA进行实时定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测的情况。在其中一份此类报告中,采样集中在美国东南部的贫困地区,并提出了贫困与土壤中寄生虫DNA存在之间的联系。某些寄生虫病在美国与贫困相关的传播是否仍然存在仍是一个重要问题。然而,我们强调在仅基于qPCR检测寄生虫来源的环境DNA而未进行进一步验证得出的解释时要谨慎。我们在此讨论使用qPCR检测环境DNA样本的局限性、采用无偏且可重复的采样策略的必要性,以及选择合适的对照区域和统计检验以得出有意义结论的重要性。