Suppr超能文献

我们在新生儿重症监护病房提供姑息治疗并采用共同决策了吗?一项为期10年的回顾性病历审查。

Are we offering palliative care and employing shared decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit? A 10-year retrospective chart review.

作者信息

Karabelas-Pittman Sawyer, Coo Helen, Lee Hannah, Moon Christine C, MacLean Gillian

机构信息

Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PEC Innov. 2025 Jan 16;6:100375. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100375. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Perinatal palliative care (PPC) supports families with a fetal diagnosis of a life-limiting condition or who are facing preterm labour at the limits of viability. Shared decision making (SDM) is the gold standard approach in PPC. The objectives of this study were to describe the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) team's involvement in PPC and the extent of SDM at an academic hospital in southeastern Ontario, and the frequency with which PPC was offered, accepted and received for live births.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts for births from January 2010-January 2020 where a life-limiting condition (LLC) had been prenatally diagnosed or there was threatened preterm labour (TPTL) at the limits of viability. Frequency distributions were used to summarize the NICU team's involvement, extent of SDM, and data related to PPC provision.

RESULTS

The LLC group included 73 patients. The NICU team was consulted for 26 (36 %). Among the 10 consults that involved decision making, SDM was documented in 9 instances (90 %). PPC was offered to 9 of 60 LLC families (15 %) with a live birth and was accepted by 8 (89 %). The TPTL Group included 112 patients. Seventy (62 %) received a consult with the NICU team. SDM was documented in 34 of 39 consults (87 %) that involved decision making. PPC was offered to 28 of 90 families (31 %) who experienced a live birth and was accepted by 16 (57 %).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate the need for standardized consultation and palliative care referral protocols to advance access to and quality of neonatal end-of-life care.

摘要

目的

围产期姑息治疗(PPC)为那些胎儿被诊断患有危及生命疾病或面临接近生存极限的早产的家庭提供支持。共同决策(SDM)是PPC的金标准方法。本研究的目的是描述安大略省东南部一家学术医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)团队在PPC中的参与情况、SDM的程度,以及活产中提供、接受和接受PPC的频率。

方法

我们回顾性审查了2010年1月至2020年1月出生的病历,这些病例中胎儿在产前被诊断患有危及生命的疾病(LLC)或存在接近生存极限的先兆早产(TPTL)。频率分布用于总结NICU团队的参与情况、SDM的程度以及与PPC提供相关的数据。

结果

LLC组包括73例患者。NICU团队参与了26例(36%)的会诊。在涉及决策的10次会诊中,有9例(90%)记录了SDM。60例LLC活产家庭中有9例(15%)被提供了PPC,其中8例(89%)接受了PPC。TPTL组包括112例患者。70例(62%)接受了NICU团队的会诊。在涉及决策的39次会诊中有34例(87%)记录了SDM。90例活产家庭中有28例(31%)被提供了PPC,其中16例(57%)接受了PPC。

结论

我们的结果表明,需要标准化的会诊和姑息治疗转诊方案,以提高新生儿临终关怀的可及性和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afcc/11790499/fced3fa1d76c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验