Korsavidou Hult Nafsika, Tarai Sambit, Hammarström Klara, Kullberg Joel, Lundström Elin, Bjerner Tomas, Glimelius Bengt, Ahlström Håkan
Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Ingång 70, Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden.
Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds v 20, Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-04815-0.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To evaluate the advantages of including versus excluding the tumor periphery and combining diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with T2-weighted imaging (T2w) for outcome predictions of preoperative radio(chemo)therapy in rectal cancer.
Four analysis strategies, based on two segmentation methods and two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences, were evaluated in 106 patients examined with pretreatment MRI. One segmentation method included the tumor periphery in the region of interest (ROI) encompassing the whole tumor (wROI), considered as the reference segmentation approach, and one included only the central part (cROI). Relevant radiomics imaging features were extracted from either T2w alone or from both T2w and DWI and used by a machine learning algorithm for the prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR), neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score, and disease recurrence. The area under the curve (AUC) was the performance measure. AUCs were compared with a bootstrapping method based on 10 bootstraps.
cROI applied to both T2w and DWI provided the highest numerical prediction of pCR (AUC 0.76), however, not significantly superior to the other strategies (p ≥ 0.138). cROI applied to both T2w and DWI also yielded the highest numerical prediction of NAR score (AUC 0.84), showing advantages over wROI-based analysis strategies (AUC 0.66 and 0.69; p ≤ 0.008). When compared to cROI applied to T2w alone (AUC 0.73), the benefit was borderline statistically significant (p = 0.053). For prediction of disease recurrence, no differences were found between the analysis strategies.
Inclusion of the tumor periphery in radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance images does not improve predictions of the preoperative therapy response in patients with rectal cancer. Excluding tumor periphery while adding DWI to T2w improves prediction of the NAR score, although it does not affect pCR or recurrence prediction.
背景/目的:评估在直肠癌术前放(化)疗疗效预测中纳入与排除肿瘤边缘以及将扩散加权成像(DWI)与T2加权成像(T2w)相结合的优势。
在106例接受术前MRI检查的患者中,基于两种分割方法和两种磁共振成像(MRI)序列评估了四种分析策略。一种分割方法将肿瘤边缘纳入包含整个肿瘤的感兴趣区域(ROI)(全ROI,wROI),视为参考分割方法,另一种仅包括中央部分(中央ROI,cROI)。从单独的T2w或T2w和DWI两者中提取相关的影像组学成像特征,并由机器学习算法用于预测病理完全缓解(pCR)、新辅助直肠(NAR)评分和疾病复发。曲线下面积(AUC)为性能指标。采用基于10次自抽样的自抽样方法比较AUC。
应用于T2w和DWI的cROI对pCR的数值预测最高(AUC 0.76),然而,并不显著优于其他策略(p≥0.138)。应用于T2w和DWI的cROI对NAR评分的数值预测也最高(AUC 0.84),显示出优于基于wROI的分析策略(AUC 0.66和0.69;p≤0.008)。与单独应用于T2w的cROI(AUC 0.73)相比,益处具有边缘统计学意义(p = 0.053)。对于疾病复发的预测,分析策略之间未发现差异。
在磁共振图像的影像组学分析中纳入肿瘤边缘并不能改善直肠癌患者术前治疗反应的预测。在T2w中排除肿瘤边缘并加入DWI可改善NAR评分的预测,尽管它不影响pCR或复发预测。