Barad Alexa, Xu Yaqin, Bender Erica, Pressman Eva K, Gu Zhenglong, O'Brien Kimberly O
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, United States.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2025 Feb;121(2):406-416. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.10.018.
Individuals of East Asian (EA) ancestry have greater risk of elevated iron (Fe) stores compared with individuals of Northern European (NE) ancestry, but no studies have assessed differences in Fe regulatory hormones between these populations.
This study aimed to evaluate hepcidin, erythropoietin, and erythroferrone as a function of ancestry and examine their associations with Fe status markers in United States adults of genetically confirmed EA or NE ancestry.
Participants in this cross-sectional study were healthy EA (n = 251) or NE (n = 253) males and premenopausal, nonpregnant females, aged 18-50 y, and without obesity. Serum hepcidin, erythropoietin, and erythroferrone concentrations were measured using ELISAs. Fe status [serum ferritin (SF), soluble transferrin receptor, total body iron, and transferrin], hematologic (complete blood count), and inflammatory (C-reactive protein and IL-6) markers were measured. Results are shown as the geometric mean (95% CI).
Hepcidin (ng/mL) was significantly higher in EA (43.9; 95% CI: 39.6, 48.7) compared with NE (31.3; 95% CI: 28.4, 34.5) males (P < 0.001) but did not differ between EA (21.8; 95% CI: 19.4, 24.6) and NE (21.3; 95% CI: 19.0, 23.8) females (P = 0.66). Interestingly, the hepcidin:SF ratio was lower in EA males (0.26; 95% CI: 0.23, 0.28) and females (0.51; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.57) compared with NE males (0.37; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.40; P < 0.001) and females (0.65; 95% CI: 0.57, 0.73; P = 0.01), respectively. These differences remained significant after adjustment for C-reactive protein (males: P-adjusted < 0.001; females: P-adjusted = 0.008) or IL-6 (males: P-adjusted < 0.001; females: P-adjusted = 0.006). Erythropoietin did not differ between ancestry groups in males (P = 0.11) or females (P = 0.96). Lastly, erythroferrone (ng/mL) was higher in EA (1.3; 95% CI: 0.8, 1.9) compared with NE (0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9; P = 0.009) males but did not differ between females (EA: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5, 1.1; NE: 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3, 0.7; P = 0.11).
A lower hepcidin:SF ratio in EA compared with NE participants suggests that among EAs, hepcidin concentrations are lower relative to the load of Fe present. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the observed differences. This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04198545.
与北欧(NE)血统的个体相比,东亚(EA)血统的个体铁(Fe)储存升高的风险更高,但尚无研究评估这两个人群之间铁调节激素的差异。
本研究旨在评估铁调素、促红细胞生成素和红细胞铁调素与血统的关系,并在美国具有基因确认的EA或NE血统的成年人中检查它们与铁状态标志物的关联。
这项横断面研究的参与者为健康的EA(n = 251)或NE(n = 253)男性以及18至50岁、无肥胖的绝经前非妊娠女性。使用酶联免疫吸附测定法测量血清铁调素、促红细胞生成素和红细胞铁调素浓度。测量铁状态[血清铁蛋白(SF)、可溶性转铁蛋白受体、全身铁和转铁蛋白]、血液学(全血细胞计数)和炎症(C反应蛋白和IL-6)标志物。结果以几何平均数(95%CI)表示。
EA男性的铁调素(ng/mL)(43.9;95%CI:39.6,48.7)显著高于NE男性(31.3;95%CI:28.4,34.5)(P < 0.001),但EA女性(21.8;95%CI:19.4,24.6)和NE女性(21.3;95%CI:19.0,23.8)之间无差异(P = 0.66)。有趣的是,与NE男性(0.37;95%CI:0.33,0.40;P < 0.001)和女性(0.65;95%CI:0.57,0.73;P = 0.01)相比,EA男性(0.26;95%CI:0.23,0.28)和女性(0.51;95%CI:0.46,0.57)的铁调素:SF比值较低。在调整C反应蛋白(男性:校正后P < 0.001;女性:校正后P = 0.008)或IL-6(男性:校正后P < 0.001;女性:校正后P = 0.006)后,这些差异仍然显著。促红细胞生成素在不同血统组的男性(P = 0.11)或女性(P = 0.96)中无差异。最后,EA男性的红细胞铁调素(ng/mL)(1.3;95%CI:0.8,1.9)高于NE男性(0.6;95%CI:0.4,0.9;P = 0.009),但女性之间无差异(EA:0.7;95%CI:0.5,1.1;NE:0.5;95%CI:0.3,0.7;P = 0.11)。
与NE参与者相比,EA参与者的铁调素:SF比值较低,这表明在EA人群中,相对于存在的铁负荷,铁调素浓度较低。需要进一步研究以阐明观察到的差异背后的机制。本研究已在clinicaltrials.gov上注册,注册号为NCT04198545。