Guiraud Marie-Geneviève, MaBouDi HaDi, Woodgate Joe, Bates Olivia K, Rodriguez Oscar Ramos, Gallo Vince, Barron Andrew B
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, UK.
School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anim Cogn. 2025 Feb 5;28(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01926-x.
Bees are flexible and adaptive learners, capable of learning stimuli seen on arrival and at departure from flowers where they have fed. This gives bees the potential to learn all information associated with a feeding event, but it also presents the challenge of managing information that is irrelevant, inconsistent, or conflicting. Here, we examined how presenting bumblebees with conflicting visual information before and after feeding influenced their learning rate and what they learned. Bees were trained to feeder stations mounted in front of a computer monitor. Visual stimuli were displayed behind each feeder station on the monitor. Positively reinforced stimuli (CS +) marked feeders offering sucrose solution. Negatively reinforced stimuli (CS-) marked feeders offering quinine solution. While alighted at the feeder station the stimuli were likely not visible to the bee. The "constant stimulus" training group saw the same stimulus throughout. For the "switched stimulus" training group, the CS + changed to the CS- during feeding. Learning was slower in the "switched stimulus" training group compared to the constant stimulus" group, but the training groups did not differ in their learning performance or the extent to which they generalised their learning. The information conflict in the "switched stimulus" group did not interfere with what had been learned. Differences between the "switched" and "constant stimulus" groups were greater for bees trained on a horizontal CS + than a vertical CS + suggesting bees differ in their processing of vertically and horizontally oriented stimuli. We discuss how bumblebees might resolve this type of information conflict so effectively, drawing on the known neurobiology of their visual learning system.
蜜蜂是灵活且善于适应的学习者,能够学习在抵达和离开它们取食过的花朵时所看到的刺激物。这使蜜蜂有潜力学习与取食事件相关的所有信息,但同时也带来了管理不相关、不一致或相互冲突信息的挑战。在此,我们研究了在喂食前后向大黄蜂呈现相互冲突的视觉信息如何影响它们的学习速度以及所学内容。蜜蜂被训练到安装在电脑显示器前的喂食站。视觉刺激在显示器上每个喂食站的后面显示。正强化刺激(CS+)标记提供蔗糖溶液的喂食器。负强化刺激(CS-)标记提供奎宁溶液的喂食器。当蜜蜂停留在喂食站时,刺激物可能对它不可见。“恒定刺激”训练组在整个过程中看到相同的刺激。对于“切换刺激”训练组,CS+在喂食期间变为CS-。与“恒定刺激组”相比,“切换刺激”训练组学习较慢,但训练组在学习表现或学习泛化程度上没有差异。“切换刺激”组中的信息冲突并未干扰所学内容。对于在水平CS+上训练的蜜蜂而言,“切换”组和“恒定刺激”组之间的差异比在垂直CS+上训练的蜜蜂更大;这表明蜜蜂在处理垂直和水平方向的刺激时存在差异。我们借鉴已知的大黄蜂视觉学习系统神经生物学知识,讨论大黄蜂如何能如此有效地解决这类信息冲突。