重度抑郁症临床试验中的随机化与安慰剂效应。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

Randomization and placebo effects in clinical trials of major depressive disorder.

作者信息

Rogers James A, Senn Stephen

机构信息

Metrum Research Group, 30 Tower Lane, Suite #140, Avon, CT, 06001-4231, USA.

Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR) The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03263-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41398-025-03263-0

PMID:39910057

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11799522/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/28a9/11799522/7710b12423e2/41398_2025_3263_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

Randomization and placebo effects in clinical trials of major depressive disorder.重度抑郁症临床试验中的随机化与安慰剂效应。

Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03263-0.

Worsening of depressive symptoms prior to randomization in clinical trials: a possible screen for placebo responders?

J Psychiatr Res. 2004 Jul-Aug;38(4):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2003.11.006.

Efficacy outcomes from 3 clinical trials of edivoxetine as adjunctive treatment for patients with major depressive disorder who are partial responders to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment.三项依度沙西汀辅助治疗对选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗反应不完全的重性抑郁障碍患者的临床疗效研究结果。

J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 May;77(5):635-42. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14m09619.

Tricyclic antidepressants versus 'active placebo', placebo or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.三环类抗抑郁药与“活性安慰剂”、安慰剂或不干预治疗成人重性抑郁障碍的比较：系统评价和试验序贯分析的方案。

Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 13;10(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01789-0.

Beneficial and harmful effects of antidepressants versus placebo, 'active placebo', or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a protocol for a systematic review of published and unpublished data with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses.抗抑郁药与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或不干预对成人重度抑郁症的有益和有害影响：对已发表和未发表数据进行系统评价的方案，包括荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。

Syst Rev. 2021 May 25;10(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01705-6.

Does the presence of an open-label antidepressant treatment period influence study outcome in clinical trials examining augmentation/combination strategies in treatment partial responders/nonresponders with major depressive disorder?在针对治疗部分缓解/无反应的重性抑郁障碍患者的增效/联合策略的临床试验中，开放性抗抑郁治疗期的存在是否会影响研究结果？

J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 May;73(5):676-83. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r06978. Epub 2012 Apr 3.

Beneficial and harmful effects of duloxetine versus placebo, 'active placebo' or no intervention for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials.度洛西汀与安慰剂、“活性安慰剂”或不干预对成人重度抑郁症的有益和有害影响：一项随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析

BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 7;15(2):e082853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082853.

Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 1;2015(6):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub2.

A meta-analysis of early sustained response rates between antidepressants and placebo for the treatment of major depressive disorder.一项关于抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症早期持续缓解率的荟萃分析。

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;26(1):56-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000195042.62724.76.

Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.

本文引用的文献

Interpreting clinical trial outcomes complicated by placebo response with an assessment of false-negative and true-negative clinical trials in depression using propensity-weighting.使用倾向评分加权法评估抑郁障碍中假阴性和真阴性临床试验，以解释受安慰剂反应影响的临床试验结果。

Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 14;13(1):388. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02685-y.

Is High Placebo Response Really a Problem in Depression Trials? A Critical Re-analysis of Depression Studies.高安慰剂反应在抑郁症试验中真的是个问题吗？对抑郁症研究的批判性重新分析。

Innov Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jul 1;16(7-08):12-17. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.

A brief note regarding randomization.关于随机化的简短说明。

Perspect Biol Med. 2013 Summer;56(3):452-3. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2013.0024.

Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials.临床试验中随机化的七大误区。

Stat Med. 2013 Apr 30;32(9):1439-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.5713. Epub 2012 Dec 17.

Importance of trends in the interpretation of an overall odds ratio in the meta-analysis of clinical trials.临床试验荟萃分析中总体比值比解释趋势的重要性。

Stat Med. 1994 Feb 15;13(3):293-6. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780130310.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验