• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保肢治疗的成本分析:利默里克大学医院对慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者的肢体血管重建术与截肢术的比较

Cost analysis of limb salvage: comparing limb revascularisation and amputation in patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI) at University Hospital Limerick.

作者信息

Toomey Anne Marie, Leahy Fiona, Purtill Helen, O'Brien Norma, O'Donovan Emer, Ahmed Zeeshan, Medani Mekki, Moloney Tony, Kavanagh Eamon G

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Co. Limerick, V94 T9PX, Limerick, Ireland.

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Rd, V94 F858, Dooradoyle Co. Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;194(2):663-673. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03885-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-03885-9
PMID:39912977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12031980/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is increasing globally. An increase in PAD in an ageing population inevitably results in an increase in incidence of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI). Loss of a limb is a life-changing event with immeasurable cost to the individual, while the potential financial benefit of saving a limb is not well documented.

AIMS

The focus of this study was to estimate the cost associated with surgical interventions used in the treatment of CLTI compared with amputation.

METHODS

The cost to treat a CLTI diagnosis in 124 patients was analysed in an acute tertiary referral hospital over a 13-month study period. The analysis included staffing, medical devices used, number of blood components used and the length of stay. Statistical methods included descriptive statistical data and the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The median cost, associated with length of stay, post-amputation and post-revascularisation (hybrid) was €61,313 [IQR = €44,417, €83,331] and €46,573 [IQR = €25,687, €58,554] respectively, p < 0.001. The total median cost for length of stay for amputees in an acute hospital, rehabilitation and a prosthetic limb was €88,820 [IQR = €74,486, €110,248]. The median surgical cost of an amputation was €2,064 [IQR = €1,342, €2,866], whilst the median surgical cost of a revascularisation procedure (hybrid) was €5,966 [IQR = €4,380, €7,723], p < 0.001, inclusive of total blood components transfused.

CONCLUSION

Revascularisation surgical interventions are more expensive than amputation, however, the length of stay, rehabilitation and prosthetic limb costs, for a patient undergoing a major limb amputation, is significantly more costly.

摘要

背景

全球外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患病率正在上升。老年人群中PAD的增加不可避免地导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)发病率的上升。肢体缺失是一个改变人生的事件,对个人造成的代价无法估量,而挽救肢体的潜在经济益处却没有充分的文献记载。

目的

本研究的重点是估计与治疗CLTI的手术干预措施相比截肢的相关成本。

方法

在一家急性三级转诊医院进行了为期13个月的研究,分析了124例CLTI诊断患者的治疗成本。分析内容包括人员配备、使用的医疗设备、使用的血液成分数量和住院时间。统计方法包括描述性统计数据和曼-惠特尼U检验。

结果

与住院时间、截肢后和血管重建(杂交手术)相关的中位数成本分别为61,313欧元[四分位距=4,4417欧元,83,331欧元]和46,573欧元[四分位距=25,687欧元,58,554欧元],p<0.001。急性医院中截肢患者的住院、康复和假肢的总中位数成本为88,820欧元[四分位距=74,486欧元,110,248欧元]。截肢的中位数手术成本为2,064欧元[四分位距=1,342欧元,2,866欧元],而血管重建手术(杂交手术)的中位数手术成本为5,966欧元[四分位距=4,380欧元,7,723欧元],p<0.001,包括输注的全血成分。

结论

血管重建手术干预比截肢更昂贵,然而,对于接受大肢体截肢的患者,住院时间、康复和假肢成本要高得多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/0f4fee504969/11845_2025_3885_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/34fa0f247819/11845_2025_3885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/137c1aced72b/11845_2025_3885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/b4730a7206b9/11845_2025_3885_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/adc1e56b4b51/11845_2025_3885_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/e8f2a3efdb34/11845_2025_3885_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/93139c4c417b/11845_2025_3885_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/0f4fee504969/11845_2025_3885_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/34fa0f247819/11845_2025_3885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/137c1aced72b/11845_2025_3885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/b4730a7206b9/11845_2025_3885_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/adc1e56b4b51/11845_2025_3885_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/e8f2a3efdb34/11845_2025_3885_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/93139c4c417b/11845_2025_3885_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733d/12031980/0f4fee504969/11845_2025_3885_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost analysis of limb salvage: comparing limb revascularisation and amputation in patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI) at University Hospital Limerick.保肢治疗的成本分析:利默里克大学医院对慢性肢体威胁性缺血(CLTI)患者的肢体血管重建术与截肢术的比较
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Apr;194(2):663-673. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03885-9. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
Vein bypass first vs. best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia due to infra-popliteal disease: the BASIL-2 RCT.静脉旁路术优先与最佳血管内治疗优先血运重建策略治疗下肢严重缺血性疾病:BASIL-2 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(65):1-72. doi: 10.3310/YTFV4524.
3
Editor's Choice - Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients Undergoing Revascularisation for Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Nationwide Observational Study.编辑推荐——下肢外周动脉疾病血管重建患者的主要肢体不良事件:一项全国性观察性研究
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Dec;68(6):737-745. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.041. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
4
Procedural and 12-month in-hospital costs of primary infra-popliteal bypass surgery, infrapopliteal best endovascular treatment, and major lower limb amputation for chronic limb threatening ischemia.原发性腘下动脉搭桥手术、腘下动脉最佳血管内治疗以及慢性肢体威胁性缺血的大下肢截肢的手术及12个月住院费用。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.232. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
Editor's Choice - Delays to Revascularisation and Outcomes of Non-Elective Admissions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: a UK Population Based Cohort Study.编辑推荐——慢性肢体威胁性缺血非择期入院血管再通延迟与结局:一项基于英国人群的队列研究
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Apr;69(4):640-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.12.038. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
6
Economic impact of limb-salvage strategies in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: modelling and budget impact study based on national registry data.慢性肢体威胁性缺血保肢策略的经济影响:基于国家登记数据的建模和预算影响研究。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae099.
7
Cost Analysis of Initial Treatment With Endovascular Revascularization, Open Surgery, or Primary Major Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.外周动脉疾病患者血管腔内血运重建、开放性手术或一期主要截肢初始治疗的成本分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;25(4):504-511. doi: 10.1177/1526602818774786. Epub 2018 May 14.
8
Streamlined Clinical Management Pathways May Reduce Major Amputations in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Prospective Cohort Study with Historical Controls.简化的临床管理路径可能减少慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的大截肢:一项有历史对照的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Mar;69(3):465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.005. Epub 2024 Sep 10.
9
Short Term Outcomes of a Prospective Registry of Popliteal and Infrapopliteal Endovascular Interventions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血的腘动脉和腘下动脉血管腔内介入前瞻性注册研究的短期结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2025 Feb;69(2):304-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.09.033. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
10
Editor's Choice - Impact of Infrapopliteal Revascularisation Establishing In Line Flow to the Wound in Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.编辑推荐——下肢慢性威胁性缺血患者腘下血管重建对建立伤口直线血流的影响
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Nov;68(5):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.024. Epub 2024 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Incidence of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in the Midland Region of New Zealand over a 12-Year Period.新西兰中部地区12年间慢性肢体威胁性缺血的发病率
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 9;11(12):3303. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123303.
2
A Systematic Review of Cost-Utility Analyses in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.慢性肢体威胁性缺血的成本效用分析的系统评价
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;85:9-21. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.04.036. Epub 2022 May 11.
3
Advances in Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease: Revascularization in PAD.外周动脉疾病血运重建的进展:PAD 中的血运重建。
Circ Res. 2021 Jun 11;128(12):1885-1912. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318261. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
5
Cost Analysis of Initial Treatment With Endovascular Revascularization, Open Surgery, or Primary Major Amputation in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.外周动脉疾病患者血管腔内血运重建、开放性手术或一期主要截肢初始治疗的成本分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;25(4):504-511. doi: 10.1177/1526602818774786. Epub 2018 May 14.
6
Design and Rationale of the Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy for Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) Trial.严重肢体缺血患者最佳血管内治疗与最佳手术治疗对比试验(BEST-CLI)的设计与原理
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jul 8;5(7):e003219. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003219.
7
Impact of "Do Not Resuscitate" Status on the Outcome of Major Vascular Surgical Procedures.“不要复苏”状态对重大血管外科手术结果的影响。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct;29(7):1339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
8
The influence of do-not-resuscitate status on the outcomes of patients undergoing emergency vascular operations.不进行心肺复苏状态对接受急诊血管手术患者预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1538-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.11.087. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
9
Short and long term mortality rates after a lower limb amputation.下肢截肢后的短期和长期死亡率。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Jul;46(1):124-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Apr 28.
10
Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: Analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received.BASIL 试验:下肢严重缺血患者旁路与血管成形术的比较:按治疗方法分析免于截肢和总生存率。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5 Suppl):18S-31S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.074.