• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于内隐统计学习与交替优势之间的相互作用:来自手动和眼动序列反应时任务的证据。

On the interaction between implicit statistical learning and the alternation advantage: Evidence from manual and oculomotor serial reaction time tasks.

作者信息

Compostella Arianna, Tagliani Marta, Vender Maria, Delfitto Denis

机构信息

Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Department of Cultures and Civilizations, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0318638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318638. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0318638
PMID:39913613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11801591/
Abstract

In this study, we examine how implicit statistical learning (ISL) interacts with the cognitive bias of the alternation advantage in serial reaction time (SRT) tasks. Our aim was to disentangle perceptual from motor aspects of learning, as well as to shed light on the cognitive sources of this alternation effect. We developed a manual (Study 1) and an oculomotor (Study 2) two-choice SRT task, with visual stimuli following the regularities of two binary artificial grammars (Fibonacci and its modification Skip). While these grammars share some deterministic transitional regularities, they differ in their probabilistic transitional regularities and distributional properties. The pattern of manual RTs in Study 1 provide evidence for ISL, showing that subjects learned the deterministic and probabilistic transitions in the two grammars. We also found a bias toward alternation (vs. repetition) in correspondence to non-deterministic points, regardless of their statistical properties in the grammars. Study 2 provides further evidence for both ISL and the alternation advantage, in terms of shorter manual RTs and higher accuracy rates of anticipatory eye movements. Saccadic responses preceding stimulus onset allow us to argue for the perceptual nature of ISL: participants detected regularities in the string by forming S-S associations based on the sequence of the perceived stimuli. Moreover, we propose that shifts in visuospatial attention preceding oculomotor programming play a role in the occurrence of the alternation advantage, and that such an effect is driven by the spatial location of the stimulus. These findings are also discussed with respect to the presence of two (possibly interacting) parsing strategies: statistical generalizations on the string vs. local hierarchical reconstruction.

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了内隐统计学习(ISL)如何与序列反应时(SRT)任务中的交替优势认知偏差相互作用。我们的目的是区分学习的感知方面和运动方面,同时阐明这种交替效应的认知来源。我们开发了一个手动(研究1)和一个动眼(研究2)二选一的SRT任务,视觉刺激遵循两种二元人工语法(斐波那契及其变体跳过)的规律。虽然这些语法具有一些确定性的过渡规律,但它们在概率性过渡规律和分布特性方面有所不同。研究1中手动反应时的模式为ISL提供了证据,表明受试者学习了两种语法中的确定性和概率性过渡。我们还发现,与非确定性点相对应,存在对交替(而非重复)的偏差,无论它们在语法中的统计特性如何。研究2在更短的手动反应时和更高的预期眼动准确率方面,为ISL和交替优势提供了进一步的证据。刺激开始前的扫视反应使我们能够论证ISL的感知性质:参与者通过基于感知到的刺激序列形成刺激-刺激关联来检测字符串中的规律。此外,我们提出,在动眼程序编制之前视觉空间注意的转移在交替优势的出现中起作用,并且这种效应是由刺激的空间位置驱动的。我们还就两种(可能相互作用的)解析策略的存在讨论了这些发现:对字符串的统计概括与局部层次重构。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/6d44a56e0650/pone.0318638.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/2972816f561c/pone.0318638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/4d34193bb1b5/pone.0318638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/b26513da3a3c/pone.0318638.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/ae77cdeba8ba/pone.0318638.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/643afba623c9/pone.0318638.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/5af5a29723e4/pone.0318638.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/de97d3c08bbc/pone.0318638.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/f6a12a36fe9c/pone.0318638.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/05e2202ec8b4/pone.0318638.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/e108c77736eb/pone.0318638.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/6d44a56e0650/pone.0318638.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/2972816f561c/pone.0318638.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/4d34193bb1b5/pone.0318638.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/b26513da3a3c/pone.0318638.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/ae77cdeba8ba/pone.0318638.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/643afba623c9/pone.0318638.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/5af5a29723e4/pone.0318638.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/de97d3c08bbc/pone.0318638.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/f6a12a36fe9c/pone.0318638.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/05e2202ec8b4/pone.0318638.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/e108c77736eb/pone.0318638.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4f8/11801591/6d44a56e0650/pone.0318638.g011.jpg

相似文献

1
On the interaction between implicit statistical learning and the alternation advantage: Evidence from manual and oculomotor serial reaction time tasks.关于内隐统计学习与交替优势之间的相互作用:来自手动和眼动序列反应时任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0318638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318638. eCollection 2025.
2
Incidental learning of a visuo-motor sequence modulates saccadic amplitude: Evidence from the serial reaction time task.偶然学习的视动序列会调节扫视幅度:来自序列反应时任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Oct;46(10):1881-1891. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000917. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
3
Disentangling sequential from hierarchical learning in Artificial Grammar Learning: Evidence from a modified Simon Task.在人工语法学习中区分序列学习和层次学习:来自修改版西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232687. eCollection 2020.
4
Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task.序列学习的预期测量:手动版与眼动版序列反应时任务
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Mar;70(3):579-589. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172095. Epub 2016 May 3.
5
Oculomotor evidence of sequence learning on the serial reaction time task.序列反应时任务中序列学习的动眼证据。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):420-32. doi: 10.3758/bf03193419.
6
Oculomotor learning is evident during implicit motor sequence learning.动眼学习在隐性运动序列学习过程中很明显。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9498. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93498-0.
7
Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.感觉偏差会产生在连续扫视眼动任务中发现的交替优势。
Exp Brain Res. 2004 Nov;159(1):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-1935-9. Epub 2004 Jul 9.
8
Visuospatial perceptual sequence learning and eye movements.视觉空间感知序列学习与眼动
Exp Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;59(5):279-85. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000155.
9
The gap effect reduces both manual and saccadic inhibition of return (IOR).差距效应减少了手动和扫视性返回抑制(IOR)。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Jul;237(7):1643-1653. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05537-8. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
10
Saccadic reaction time in the monkey: advanced preparation of oculomotor programs is primarily responsible for express saccade occurrence.猴子的扫视反应时间:眼动程序的提前准备是快速扫视发生的主要原因。
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.6.3666.

本文引用的文献

1
Finding Hierarchical Structure in Binary Sequences: Evidence from Lindenmayer Grammar Learning.在二进制序列中发现层次结构:来自 Lindenmayer 语法学习的证据。
Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;47(1):e13242. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13242.
2
Probability, Dependency, and Frequency Are Not All Equally Involved in Statistical Learning.概率、相关性和频率在统计学习中的参与程度并不相同。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Sep;69(5):241-252. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000561.
3
Learning Higher-Order Transitional Probabilities in Nonhuman Primates.在非人类灵长类动物中学习高阶转换概率。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;46(4):e13121. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13121.
4
Oculomotor anticipation reveals a multitude of learning processes underlying the serial reaction time task.眼动预测揭示了序列反应时任务中多种潜在的学习过程。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6190. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85842-x.
5
Statistical learning of unbalanced exclusive-or temporal sequences in humans.人类中不平衡异或时间序列的统计学习。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246826. eCollection 2021.
6
Implicit sequence learning in individuals with Parkinson's disease: The added value of using an ocular version of the serial reaction time (O-SRT) task.帕金森病患者的内隐序列学习:使用眼动版序列反应时任务(O-SRT)的附加价值。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105654. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105654. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
7
Disentangling sequential from hierarchical learning in Artificial Grammar Learning: Evidence from a modified Simon Task.在人工语法学习中区分序列学习和层次学习:来自修改版西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0232687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232687. eCollection 2020.
8
Implicit Learning, Bilingualism, and Dyslexia: Insights From a Study Assessing AGL With a Modified Simon Task.内隐学习、双语能力与阅读障碍:一项使用改良西蒙任务评估AGL的研究所得见解
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1647. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01647. eCollection 2019.
9
Eye movements in implicit artificial grammar learning.内隐人工语法学习中的眼动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Sep;43(9):1387-1402. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000350. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
10
Anticipation measures of sequence learning: manual versus oculomotor versions of the serial reaction time task.序列学习的预期测量:手动版与眼动版序列反应时任务
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Mar;70(3):579-589. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1172095. Epub 2016 May 3.