• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

负压伤口治疗系统(PICO 7,施乐辉公司)对接受择期结直肠切除术和急诊剖腹手术的高危患者手术部位感染的影响。

Impact of the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO 7 Smith and Nephew) on Surgical Site Infections in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resections and Emergency Laparotomy.

作者信息

Beniwal Abhijeet, Karwasra Isha

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery, St. Mark's Hospital at Central Middlesex Hospital, London, GBR.

Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):e77103. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77103. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.77103
PMID:39917136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11802194/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant concern in colorectal surgery, impacting patient outcomes and increasing treatment costs. The study investigates the effect of PICO 7 (Smith & Nephew) dressings, a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system, on the incidence of SSIs in high-risk patients undergoing elective colorectal resections and emergency laparotomies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Colorectal Surgery Unit at Russell's Hall Hospital, Dudley, United Kingdom. The cohort included patients who underwent open colorectal resections and emergency laparotomies with PICO 7 dressing following laparotomy wound closure. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI within 30 days of surgery. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, frequency of readmissions, episodes of return to theatre, and interventions such as radiological or open drainage of the abscess. Data were compared with existing literature, given the plan was originally to compare outcomes with a cohort managed with conventional dressings.

RESULTS

A total of 27 cases were reviewed where PICO 7 was applied. Of these, 21 were emergency laparotomies, 11 patients had a stoma created, and 16 had abdominal cavity contamination (faecal matter, pus, serous collection). The majority (14 patients) had a body mass index (BMI) >30, and 16 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3. Out of these, eight (30%) developed SSIs, including overlaps of dehiscence and deep space infection. The average hospital stay was 17 days, with one patient readmitted with SSI and four requiring interventions such as return to theatre or radiological drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found a higher incidence of SSIs (30%) compared to existing literature, despite using NPWT. Contributing factors included perforated viscus, high BMI, multiple comorbidities, and stoma creation. A larger study cohort with a control group is necessary for further evaluation.

摘要

背景

手术部位感染(SSIs)是结直肠手术中的一个重大问题,影响患者预后并增加治疗成本。本研究调查了PICO 7(施乐辉公司)敷料(一种负压伤口治疗(NPWT)系统)对接受择期结直肠切除术和急诊剖腹手术的高危患者手术部位感染发生率的影响。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究在英国达德利拉塞尔霍尔医院的结直肠外科进行。该队列包括接受开放性结直肠切除术和急诊剖腹手术且在剖腹伤口闭合后使用PICO 7敷料的患者。主要终点是术后30天内手术部位感染的发生率。次要终点包括住院时间、再次入院频率、返回手术室的次数以及诸如脓肿的放射学或开放引流等干预措施。鉴于最初计划是将结果与使用传统敷料管理的队列进行比较,因此将数据与现有文献进行了比较。

结果

共审查了27例应用PICO 7的病例。其中,21例为急诊剖腹手术,11例患者造口,16例有腹腔污染(粪便、脓液、浆液性积液)。大多数(14例患者)体重指数(BMI)>30,16例患者美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为3级。其中,8例(30%)发生手术部位感染,包括切口裂开和深部间隙感染的重叠。平均住院时间为17天,1例患者因手术部位感染再次入院,4例需要诸如返回手术室或放射学引流等干预措施。

结论

该研究发现,尽管使用了负压伤口治疗,但与现有文献相比,手术部位感染的发生率更高(30%)。促成因素包括脏器穿孔、高BMI、多种合并症和造口。需要更大的研究队列和对照组进行进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/ddcbf0033704/cureus-0017-00000077103-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/13499d587f1f/cureus-0017-00000077103-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/f43795da52a2/cureus-0017-00000077103-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/0b76191a9ed9/cureus-0017-00000077103-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/f98b279fbb7d/cureus-0017-00000077103-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/61f761928845/cureus-0017-00000077103-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/bc158267d2ba/cureus-0017-00000077103-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/9ce285dd0fdd/cureus-0017-00000077103-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/27f30ea422f8/cureus-0017-00000077103-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/eac90f00f139/cureus-0017-00000077103-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/571b3f9a4163/cureus-0017-00000077103-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/674d39c3f9c6/cureus-0017-00000077103-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/cd4ca23127b4/cureus-0017-00000077103-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/ddcbf0033704/cureus-0017-00000077103-i13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/13499d587f1f/cureus-0017-00000077103-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/f43795da52a2/cureus-0017-00000077103-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/0b76191a9ed9/cureus-0017-00000077103-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/f98b279fbb7d/cureus-0017-00000077103-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/61f761928845/cureus-0017-00000077103-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/bc158267d2ba/cureus-0017-00000077103-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/9ce285dd0fdd/cureus-0017-00000077103-i07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/27f30ea422f8/cureus-0017-00000077103-i08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/eac90f00f139/cureus-0017-00000077103-i09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/571b3f9a4163/cureus-0017-00000077103-i10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/674d39c3f9c6/cureus-0017-00000077103-i11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/cd4ca23127b4/cureus-0017-00000077103-i12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7354/11802194/ddcbf0033704/cureus-0017-00000077103-i13.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO 7 Smith and Nephew) on Surgical Site Infections in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resections and Emergency Laparotomy.负压伤口治疗系统(PICO 7,施乐辉公司)对接受择期结直肠切除术和急诊剖腹手术的高危患者手术部位感染的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Jan 7;17(1):e77103. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77103. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
PICO™ (Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy) Dressing Use as Postoperative Prophylaxis for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Spinal Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Centre Study.PICO™(闭合切口负压伤口治疗)敷料用于脊柱手术术后预防手术部位感染:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 11;16(9):e69214. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69214. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.负压伤口治疗用于通过一期缝合愈合的手术伤口。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 26;3(3):CD009261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub4.
4
Negative Pressure Dressings (PICO) on Laparotomy Wounds Do Not Reduce Risk of Surgical Site Infection.负压伤口敷料(PICO)对剖腹伤口并不能降低手术部位感染的风险。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Apr;21(3):231-238. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.078. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Prophylactic PICO dressing shortens wound dressing requirements post emergency laparotomy (EL-PICO trial).预防性 PICO 敷料可缩短急诊剖腹手术后的伤口敷料需求(EL-PICO 试验)。
World J Emerg Surg. 2024 Nov 22;19(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-024-00560-9.
6
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.负压伤口疗法在普通外科和结直肠外科闭合性剖腹切口的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):e183467. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3467. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
7
Enhancing Healing Strategies: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Delayed Primary Closure in Abdominal Wounds Post-emergency Laparotomy for Intestinal Perforation.增强愈合策略:负压伤口治疗与肠穿孔急诊剖腹术后腹部伤口的二期缝合延迟闭合
Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60738. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60738. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Negative pressure wound therapy for emergency laparotomy incisions: A national database propensity matched study.急诊剖腹手术切口负压伤口治疗:一项全国数据库倾向匹配研究。
Am J Surg. 2024 Feb;228:287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.055. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
9
Preventive NPWT over closed incisions in general surgery: does age matter?预防性 NPWT 对普外科闭合切口的影响:年龄是否重要?
Int J Surg. 2014;12 Suppl 2:S64-S68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.378. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
10
[Investigation and factor analysis of postoperative surgical site infections in emergency abdominal surgery in China from 2018 to 2021 based on Chinese SSI Surveillance].基于中国外科手术部位感染监测的2018至2021年中国急诊腹部手术后手术部位感染调查及因素分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 25;26(9):827-836. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230619-00216.

本文引用的文献

1
Negative Pressure Dressings (PICO) on Laparotomy Wounds Do Not Reduce Risk of Surgical Site Infection.负压伤口敷料(PICO)对剖腹伤口并不能降低手术部位感染的风险。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Apr;21(3):231-238. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.078. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
2
Role of negative pressure wound therapy in the prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery.负压伤口治疗在结直肠手术中预防手术部位感染的作用。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2019 May;97(5):268-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Surgical site infection following abdominal surgery: a prospective cohort study.
腹部手术后手术部位感染:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Can J Surg. 2019 Apr 1;62(2):111-117. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004818.
4
Prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy reduces the risk of surgical site infection after caesarean section in obese women: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial.预防性切口负压伤口治疗可降低肥胖妇女剖宫产术后手术部位感染的风险:一项实用随机临床试验。
BJOG. 2019 Apr;126(5):628-635. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15413. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Prophylactic closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy is associated with decreased surgical site infection in high-risk colorectal surgery laparotomy wounds.预防性闭合切口负压伤口治疗与高危结直肠手术剖腹伤口的手术部位感染减少有关。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Jan;21(1):110-118. doi: 10.1111/codi.14350. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
6
Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on molecular markers in diabetic foot ulcers.负压伤口疗法对糖尿病足溃疡分子标志物的影响。
Gene. 2018 Aug 15;667:56-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.05.032. Epub 2018 May 11.
7
Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials Evaluating a Prophylactic Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System for the Prevention of Surgical Site Complications.评估一次性预防性负压伤口治疗系统预防手术部位并发症的对照试验的Meta分析
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Oct;18(7):810-819. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.156. Epub 2017 Sep 8.
8
Association Between Obesity and Wound Infection Following Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肥胖与结直肠手术后伤口感染的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Oct;21(10):1700-1712. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3494-y. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,包括对清洁-污染手术中预防性负压伤口治疗与传统敷料相比手术部位感染风险的GRADE分级。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4673. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004673.
10
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy dressings (iNPWTd) in routine primary hip and knee arthroplasties: A randomised controlled trial.常规初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中使用切口负压伤口治疗敷料(iNPWTd):一项随机对照试验。
Bone Joint Res. 2016 Aug;5(8):328-37. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.58.BJR-2016-0022.R1.