• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留Retzius间隙的根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚首批200例病例

Retzius-sparing radical prosatectomy: First 200 Australian cases.

作者信息

Gianduzzo Troy Richard John, Dundee Philip Ellard

机构信息

The Wesley Hospital Brisbane Australia.

The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia.

出版信息

BJUI Compass. 2025 Feb 4;6(2):e489. doi: 10.1002/bco2.489. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/bco2.489
PMID:39917586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11794102/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to report the first multi-centred Australian series of 200 cases of Retzius-sparing radical prostatectomy (RSRP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between April 2017 and June 2024, 200 RSRP procedures (197 robotic, three laparoscopic) were performed separately by the authors in five centres across two Australian cities (Melbourne, Victoria and Brisbane, Queensland). Data were collected prospectively with ethics committee approval (UCH-HREC 2019.01.279) at weeks 1, 4-6, and three-monthly. Exclusion criteria included prostate size >80 cc, significant middle lobe, large anterior tumour, previous TURP or any clinical factor deemed to make RSRP unsuitable. These criteria were relaxed as experience was gained.

RESULTS

Median (interquartile range) age, body mass index and PSA were 65 (60-70) years, 26 (25-29) kg/m and 5.2 (4.0-7.0) ng/mL. Low, intermediate and high D'Amico risk groups were 3.5%, 75.0% and 21.5%, respectively. Median (interquartile range) skin-to-skin operative time was 163 (125-210) min and blood loss 200 (100-350) mL. There were 17 (8.5%) Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2 complications and 8 (4%) grade 3 complications. Final pT stage was 60.5% pT2 and 39.5% pT3. The overall positive surgical margins (PSM) rate was 14.5% including 3.3% pT2 and 29.1% pT3. At 1 week post catheter removal 53.5% were pad-free, increasing to 58.5% and 65.0% at 4 and 6 weeks, then 79.5%, 84.6%, 88.2% and 91.3% at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. When a security pad is included, 71.5% and 85.5% of men were continent at 4 and 6 weeks, then 94%, 96%, 96% and 97% at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. Three men required a suburethral sling and one an artificial urinary sphincter. Ninety of 140 (60.4%) preoperatively potent men were potent at 12 months with or without phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

RSRP provides excellent early continence and can be introduced safely with good oncological results by experienced minimally- invasive surgeons.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是报告澳大利亚首个多中心的200例保留雷兹ius间隙的根治性前列腺切除术(RSRP)病例系列。

患者与方法

2017年4月至2024年6月期间,作者在澳大利亚两个城市(维多利亚州墨尔本和昆士兰州布里斯班)的五个中心分别进行了200例RSRP手术(197例机器人手术,3例腹腔镜手术)。在伦理委员会批准(UCH - HREC 2019.01.279)下,于第1周、4 - 6周及之后每三个月前瞻性收集数据。排除标准包括前列腺体积>80 cc、显著中叶、较大前部肿瘤、既往经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)或任何被认为使RSRP不适合的临床因素。随着经验积累,这些标准有所放宽。

结果

年龄、体重指数和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的中位数(四分位间距)分别为65(60 - 70)岁、26(25 - 29)kg/m²和5.2(4.0 - 7.0)ng/mL。低、中、高D'Amico风险组分别为3.5%、75.0%和21.5%。皮肤到皮肤的手术时间中位数(四分位间距)为163(125 - 210)分钟,失血量为200(100 - 350)mL。有17例(8.5%)Clavien - Dindo 1 - 2级并发症和8例(4%)3级并发症。最终pT分期为pT2占60.5%,pT3占39.5%。总体手术切缘阳性(PSM)率为14.5%,其中pT2为3.3%,pT3为29.1%。拔除导尿管后1周,53.5%的患者无需使用尿垫,4周和6周时分别增至58.5%和65.0%,3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月时分别为79.5%、84.6%、88.2%和91.3%。若包括安全尿垫,4周和6周时分别有71.5%和85.5%的男性控尿,3个月、6个月、9个月和12个月时分别为94%、96%、96%和97%。3名男性需要尿道下悬带,1名需要人工尿道括约肌。140例术前有性功能的男性中,90例(60.4%)在12个月时无论是否使用磷酸二酯酶5抑制剂仍有性功能。

结论

RSRP能实现良好的早期控尿,经验丰富的微创外科医生可安全开展该手术,且肿瘤学效果良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e0a/11794102/51065e0b7153/BCO2-6-e489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e0a/11794102/51065e0b7153/BCO2-6-e489-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e0a/11794102/51065e0b7153/BCO2-6-e489-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Retzius-sparing radical prosatectomy: First 200 Australian cases.保留Retzius间隙的根治性前列腺切除术:澳大利亚首批200例病例
BJUI Compass. 2025 Feb 4;6(2):e489. doi: 10.1002/bco2.489. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: racial considerations for 250 consecutive cases.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术:250 例连续病例的种族考虑。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Apr;15(2):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01096-1. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
4
[Evaluating continence recovery time after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy].[评估机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的控尿恢复时间]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Aug 18;53(4):697-703. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.04.013.
5
A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.一项实用随机对照试验研究了保留耻骨前列腺韧带在机器人辅助前列腺根治性切除术后早期尿控恢复中的影响。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.
6
Multicentric experience in Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy performed by expert surgeons for high-risk prostate cancer.由经验丰富的外科医生施行保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗高危前列腺癌的多中心经验。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Oct;74(5):607-614. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.22.04857-1. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术学习曲线之外:≥1 年随访的前 200 例患者的肿瘤学和功能结果。
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
9
Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术相比,能持久改善排尿功能和生活质量,且不影响肿瘤疗效:单术者系列研究及分步指南
Eur Urol. 2021 Jun;79(6):839-857. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.010. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
10
Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis.保留耻骨后间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与常规机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗经活检证实的前列腺癌患者的手术和功能结局。这些结果是否值得?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prostate. 2023 Nov;83(15):1395-1414. doi: 10.1002/pros.24604. Epub 2023 Aug 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Urinary and Sexual Impact of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Reporting of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in the First Year after Radical Prostatectomy in a Contemporary Multicentre Cohort in the United Kingdom.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对泌尿及性功能的影响:英国当代多中心队列中前列腺癌根治术后第一年患者报告结局的报告
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 May 21;64:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.003. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Continence criteria of 193 618 patients after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.193618 例开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者的控尿标准。
BJU Int. 2024 Jul;134(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/bju.16180. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Functional outcomes and safety of focal therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review on results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
前列腺癌局灶治疗的功能结局和安全性:基于结果和患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的系统评价。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Dec;27(4):614-622. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00698-8. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
4
Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis.保留耻骨前列腺韧带的机器人辅助前列腺根治术与传统机器人辅助前列腺根治术的疗效比较:KSER 更新系列系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 26;17(5):e0268182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268182. eCollection 2022.
5
Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study).局限性前列腺癌治疗的功能和生活质量结局(前列腺癌检测和治疗研究 [ProtecT])。
BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-380. doi: 10.1111/bju.15739. Epub 2022 May 3.
6
Comparison of urinary and sexual patient-reported outcomes between open radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a propensity score matched, population-based study in Victoria.开放根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术患者尿控和性功能结局的比较:维多利亚州基于人群的倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Feb 7;22(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00966-0.
7
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
8
Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.保留Retzius间隙与标准机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术治疗临床局限性前列腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013641.pub2.
9
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: early learning curve experience in three continents.保留Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:三大洲的早期学习曲线经验。
BJU Int. 2021 Apr;127(4):412-417. doi: 10.1111/bju.15196. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
10
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准方法的比较:系统评价和比较结果分析。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/bju.14887. Epub 2019 Aug 26.