• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克洛的体外细菌学研究。抑菌圈直径与最低抑菌浓度的相关性(作者译)

[Bacteriological in vitro investigations with cefaclor. Correlation of inhibition zone diameter and minimal inhibitory concentration (author's transl)].

作者信息

Grimm H

出版信息

Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:540-2. doi: 10.1007/BF01659730.

DOI:10.1007/BF01659730
PMID:399245
Abstract

A comparison of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cefaclor and cephalexin shows that cefaclor is noticeably superior against Citrobacter. Enterobacter and Proteus mirabilis. Only slight differences are seen against other enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus. Both cefaclor and cephalexin are completely ineffective against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Regression analysis to correlate the inhibition zone diameter and MIC of cefaclor produced a very good correlation (r = -0.9741). Using 30 mcg discs on DST agar, inhibition zones of more than 20 mm are to be interpreted as "sensitivity" and zones of less than 13 mm as "resistance".

摘要

头孢克洛和头孢氨苄的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)比较表明,头孢克洛对柠檬酸杆菌、肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌的抗菌活性明显更强。对其他肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌仅观察到细微差异。头孢克洛和头孢氨苄对肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌均完全无效。头孢克洛抑菌圈直径与MIC的回归分析显示出很好的相关性(r = -0.9741)。在药敏试验(DST)琼脂平板上使用含30 mcg药物的纸片时,抑菌圈直径大于20 mm应判为“敏感”,小于13 mm判为“耐药”。

相似文献

1
[Bacteriological in vitro investigations with cefaclor. Correlation of inhibition zone diameter and minimal inhibitory concentration (author's transl)].头孢克洛的体外细菌学研究。抑菌圈直径与最低抑菌浓度的相关性(作者译)
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:540-2. doi: 10.1007/BF01659730.
2
[The antibacterial efficacy of cefaclor in routine testing of clinical material from two Berlin hospitals (author's transl)].头孢克洛在柏林两家医院临床材料常规检测中的抗菌效力(作者译)
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:547-50. doi: 10.1007/BF01659732.
3
[In vitro activity of cefaclor (author's transl)].头孢克洛的体外活性(作者译)
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:518-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01659726.
4
[Bacteriological study on cefadroxil in vitro. Correlation between diameter of inhibition zone and inhibitory concentration (author's transl)].头孢羟氨苄的体外细菌学研究。抑菌圈直径与抑菌浓度之间的相关性(作者译)
Arzneimittelforschung. 1980;30(2):301-3.
5
[The antibacterial efficacy of cefaclor against bacteria resistant to ampicillin, tetracycline and co-trimoxazole (author's transl)].
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:536-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01659729.
6
In vitro activity of Ro 15-8074 and Ro 19-5247 in comparison to cefaclor and cefalexin.
Infection. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):122-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01650213.
7
Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of four oral cephems: cephalexin, cefaclor, cefatrizine and cefadroxil.
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1984 Feb;17(1):11-8.
8
[Resistance of gram-negative bacteria against cefaclor and other antibiotics (author's transl)].
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:527-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01659727.
9
[Subinhibitory activity of cefaclor and cephalexin (author's transl)].
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:543-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01659731.
10
In-vitro activity of cefaclor, cephalexin and ampicillin against 2458 clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae.头孢克洛、头孢氨苄和氨苄西林对2458株流感嗜血杆菌临床分离株的体外活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jan;21(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/jac/21.1.27.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro activity of Ro 15-8074 and Ro 19-5247 in comparison to cefaclor and cefalexin.
Infection. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):122-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01650213.
2
[Antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of eleven oral cephalosporins].十一种口服头孢菌素的抗菌活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性
Infection. 1990;18 Suppl 3:S155-67. doi: 10.1007/BF01644637.
3
Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil.头孢泊肟与头孢克肟、头孢地尼、头孢他美、头孢布烯、氯碳头孢、头孢丙烯、BAY 3522、头孢呋辛、头孢克洛和头孢羟氨苄的抗菌活性比较。

本文引用的文献

1
Antibiotic sensitivity testing. Report of an international collaborative study.抗生素敏感性试验。一项国际合作研究报告。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol. 1971;217:Suppl 217:1+.
2
[Comparison of regression line analysis for several antibiotics on different media (author's transl)].几种抗生素在不同培养基上的回归线分析比较(作者译)
Immun Infekt. 1978 Dec;6(6):244-8.
3
Diffusion disk susceptibility testing with cefaclor.头孢克洛扩散纸片药敏试验
Infection. 1991 Sep-Oct;19(5):353-62. doi: 10.1007/BF01645369.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):228-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.13.2.228.
4
Antimicrobial activity in vitro of cefaclor, a new oral cephalosporin.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Feb-Mar;18(2-3):85-90. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb02425.x.