Grimm H
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:540-2. doi: 10.1007/BF01659730.
A comparison of the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cefaclor and cephalexin shows that cefaclor is noticeably superior against Citrobacter. Enterobacter and Proteus mirabilis. Only slight differences are seen against other enterobacteria and Staphylococcus aureus. Both cefaclor and cephalexin are completely ineffective against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Regression analysis to correlate the inhibition zone diameter and MIC of cefaclor produced a very good correlation (r = -0.9741). Using 30 mcg discs on DST agar, inhibition zones of more than 20 mm are to be interpreted as "sensitivity" and zones of less than 13 mm as "resistance".
头孢克洛和头孢氨苄的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)比较表明,头孢克洛对柠檬酸杆菌、肠杆菌和奇异变形杆菌的抗菌活性明显更强。对其他肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌仅观察到细微差异。头孢克洛和头孢氨苄对肠球菌和铜绿假单胞菌均完全无效。头孢克洛抑菌圈直径与MIC的回归分析显示出很好的相关性(r = -0.9741)。在药敏试验(DST)琼脂平板上使用含30 mcg药物的纸片时,抑菌圈直径大于20 mm应判为“敏感”,小于13 mm判为“耐药”。